On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 01:18:32AM -0800, nate wrote:
> Michael D. Crawford said:
> > That would be great if I could just do DHCP ethernet.
> >
> > But I have visited people who had DSL connections in their homes, that
> > required them to run some windows program to authenticate.
>
>
> if thats
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 06:52:14PM -0500, Michael D. Crawford wrote:
> I am making plans for developing a turnkey system that will be installed in
> retail stores, that will have a DSL connection.
>
> Unfortunately, I live out in the Maine woods, far from available DSL
> service. I connect to t
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 02:27, Michael D. Crawford wrote:
> That would be great if I could just do DHCP ethernet.
>
> But I have visited people who had DSL connections in their homes, that required
> them to run some windows program to authenticate.
The end-user hardware that providers give to hom
Michael D. Crawford said:
> That would be great if I could just do DHCP ethernet.
>
> But I have visited people who had DSL connections in their homes, that
> required them to run some windows program to authenticate.
if thats the case then I reccomend not using such providers. As you will
proba
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, Michael D. Crawford wrote:
> Does Linux handle DSL authentication? Can linux configure a DSL modem to
> handle authentication, without any use of Windows? Is there a way I can test
> this authentication with my office LAN?
apt-get install pppoe
Worked like a charm when I
That would be great if I could just do DHCP ethernet.
But I have visited people who had DSL connections in their homes, that required
them to run some windows program to authenticate.
My concern is that I won't have any control over the authentication required by
the ISP. I expect that many di
Bob Proulx said:
>
> Agreed about nothing to test. But disagree about static addresses. In a
> retail location why would static addresses be needed? In fact I think a
> fully DHCP configuration would be more desirable.
more convient :) I suppose you could do some sort of dynamic dns thing
with
nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-01-08 17:32:05 -0800]:
>
> Michael D. Crawford said:
>
> > I expect that if I were an ISP and needed to service hundreds of
> > connections, this wouldn't be a problem. Does anyone make DSL server
> > hardware that serves one connection? What do I even look for.
Michael D. Crawford said:
> I expect that if I were an ISP and needed to service hundreds of
> connections, this wouldn't be a problem. Does anyone make DSL server
> hardware that serves one connection? What do I even look for.
not sure about your neck of the woods, but in mine, my DSL is pla
9 matches
Mail list logo
