Re: Mailing list recomendation

2002-02-01 Thread Erik van der Meulen
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 09:05:32 -0500, Brian Clark wrote: > > Thanks for the recommendations! I have installed mailman and it seems > > to work well. I do have this little problem with the entry it left in > > /etc/cron.d I think that I activated it by editing (is that possible) > > and since tha

Re: Mailing list recomendation

2002-01-31 Thread Brian Clark
* Erik van der Meulen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 31. 2002 04:54]: [...] > Thanks for the recommendations! I have installed mailman and it seems > to work well. I do have this little problem with the entry it left in > /etc/cron.d I think that I activated it by editing (is that possible) > and since

Re: Mailing list recomendation

2002-01-31 Thread Erik van der Meulen
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 20:42:51 +0100, Erik van der Meulen wrote: > Hi all - I am looking for a mailing list server to replace Majordomo > since that does not seem to be available in Debian anymore. Thanks for the recommendations! I have installed mailman and it seems to work well. I do have thi

Re: Mailing list recomendation

2002-01-31 Thread Jérôme Marant
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 08:42:51PM +0100, Erik van der Meulen wrote: > Hi all - I am looking for a mailing list server to replace Majordomo > since that does not seem to be available in Debian anymore. > > I have a Potato system with sendmail and need to run only a few small > lists (<100 users) b

Re: Mailing list recomendation

2002-01-30 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Erik van der Meulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.30.2042 +0100]: > I have a Potato system with sendmail and need to run only a few small > lists (<100 users) but for different domains. the only one i would suggest, which i actually find better than any of the usual ones, including mail

Re: Mailing list recomendation

2002-01-30 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Brian Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.30.2052 +0100]: > I would go with Mailman. It's served me well for many lists. i would too, but not with the potato version. get 2.0 at the very least because 1.x lacks some features. i don't remember which, but i had to switch to fall in love

RE: Mailing list recomendation

2002-01-30 Thread Jeremy L. Gaddis
As Brian Clark already suggested, I'd have to agree with mailman. I can't comment on any of the other list programs as I haven't used any of them. I've been running mailman and haven't felt the need to explore any other options. j. -- Jeremy L. Gaddis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -Original Mess

Re: Mailing list recomendation

2002-01-30 Thread Brian Clark
* Erik van der Meulen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 30. 2002 14:44]: [...] > - sympa > - mailman > - fml > - smartlist > - listar I would go with Mailman. It's served me well for many lists. > I would welcome recomendations for the one that would suit my needs > best. Ease of installation, configur