Re: MTA security

2001-04-07 Thread Dave Sherohman
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 12:28:37PM +0530, Raghavendra Bhat wrote: > Dave Sherohman posts: > > I'd like to go with exim, but I'm not entirely convinced > > that it would be a good choice for functionality and security. > > What is the exact reason for not being convinced about exim ? Primarily lac

Re: MTA security

2001-04-07 Thread Raghavendra Bhat
Dave Sherohman posts: > I'd like to go with exim, but I'm not entirely convinced > that it would be a good choice for functionality and security. What is the exact reason for not being convinced about exim ? Go ahead but before that read Yann Golanski's papers on setting up exim for catering to o

Re: MTA security

2001-04-06 Thread Nate Amsden
Dave Sherohman wrote: > > From a security standpoint, how does exim compare to sendmail? What about > postfix? > > It appears that exim is Debian's default MTA, which is why I've run it > before and it's what I'm most familiar with. Now I've inherited a network > with several sendmail installat

Re: MTA security

2001-04-06 Thread Dimitri Maziuk
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 01:32:17PM -0500, Dave Sherohman wrote: > >From a security standpoint, how does exim compare to sendmail? What about > postfix? > > It appears that exim is Debian's default MTA, which is why I've run it > before and it's what I'm most familiar with. Now I've inherited a n