Re: MTA (DMARC)

Hi. On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 05:49:44AM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: > >> Here what I got from the Debian mailing list server > >> Got some idea ? > > > > Your MTA signs these headers: > > > > Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Cc:References:To:From:Sub

Re: MTA (DMARC)

Hi, On 2021-07-10 3:46 a.m., Reco wrote: > Hi. > > On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 04:24:42PM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside > wrote: >> Hi, >> I've wrote a message regarding my MTA. >> >> I was thinking it's corrected but... >> >> Here what I got from the Debian mailing list server >> Got

Re: MTA (DMARC)

Hi. On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 04:24:42PM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: > Hi, > I've wrote a message regarding my MTA. > > I was thinking it's corrected but... > > Here what I got from the Debian mailing list server > Got some idea ? Your MTA signs these headers: Content-T

Re: MTA (DMARC)

On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 11:43:56PM +0300, Kevin N. wrote: > Not sure if that is the case here, but sometimes mailing list > software alters the original message headers which then can lead to > failed DKIM signature checks. Most probably. This is a known problem. DKIM is (roughly speaking) a signa

Re: MTA (DMARC)

0RddkB/yYQulFjZ ng9LWTIA==; Received: from [38.133.51.49] (port=38228 helo=[192.168.1.202]) by premium58.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1m1wqo-001LYR-QV; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 16:11:59 -0

Re: MTA (corrected)

Hi, On 2021-07-05 1:16 p.m., Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: > Hi, > > On 2021-07-05 1:07 p.m., Greg Wooledge wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 01:00:07PM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside >> wrote: >>> On 2021-07-05 12:46 p.m., Greg Wooledge wrote: unicorn:~$ host _dc-mx.f1202d

Re: MTA (corrected)

On 2021-07-05 21:12:01 +0100, Joe wrote: > It's not a big issue. My public FQDN and PTR have no relationship at > all with any email domain I use, and I've never had mail refused for > that reason, over more than fifteen years. I also use a single HELO, and > that only matches one domain. Again, no

Re: MTA

On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 16:45:17 +0200 Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2021-07-05 10:06:24 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > A more sensible antispam filter might consider a mismatched reverse > > to be one potential factor in deciding whether a given message is > > "spam". In the absence of any other f

Re: MTA

On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 09:23:03 -0400 Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: > > I was thinking that maybe I should start thinking about hosting my own > email server. But I wasn't sure if I felt like I had the nerve to do > so. Some people say it's a lot of maintenance work. > No, it's not a big

Re: MTA (corrected)

On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 16:55:44 +0200 Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2021-07-05 10:32:27 -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: > > > What is this 162.213.253.79 IP address? > > > > The IP address 162.213.253.79 is the dedicated IP I rent from > > Namecheap. > > OK. > > > Can you control

Re: MTA

On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 09:35:22 -0400 Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 09:23:03AM -0400, Polyna-Maude > Racicot-Summerside wrote: > > Reporting-MTA: dns; premium58.web-hosting.com > > > > Action: failed > > Final-Recipient: rfc822;bjoern.ri...@greenbone.net > > Status: 5.0.0 > > Remote

Re: MTA (corrected)

Hi, On 2021-07-05 1:07 p.m., Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 01:00:07PM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside > wrote: >> On 2021-07-05 12:46 p.m., Greg Wooledge wrote: >>> unicorn:~$ host _dc-mx.f1202d9a4fb3.cyrania.com. >>> _dc-mx.f1202d9a4fb3.cyrania.com has address 162.213.253

Re: MTA (corrected)

On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 01:00:07PM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: > On 2021-07-05 12:46 p.m., Greg Wooledge wrote: > > unicorn:~$ host _dc-mx.f1202d9a4fb3.cyrania.com. > > _dc-mx.f1202d9a4fb3.cyrania.com has address 162.213.253.79 > > Host _dc-mx.f1202d9a4fb3.cyrania.com not found: 3

Re: MTA (corrected)

Hi On 2021-07-05 12:46 p.m., Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 10:32:27AM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside > wrote: >> This is a copy of the dump of my domain name config for CYRANIA.COM >> >> ---START >> > [snip] > >> cyrania.com. 1 IN A 162.213.253.79 >

Re: MTA (corrected)

On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 10:32:27AM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: > This is a copy of the dump of my domain name config for CYRANIA.COM > > ---START > [snip] > cyrania.com. 1 IN A 162.213.253.79 > ;; MX Records > cyrania.com. 1 IN MX 0 mail.

Re: MTA (corrected)

Hi, On 2021-07-05 10:55 a.m., Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2021-07-05 10:32:27 -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: >>> What is this 162.213.253.79 IP address? >> >> The IP address 162.213.253.79 is the dedicated IP I rent from Namecheap. > > OK. > >> Can you control its reverse? >>> >>

Re: MTA

Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside writes: > I agree with you, people who SPAM do have the infrastructure to make > their domain resolution match, both forward, reverse and possibly > side-way if there's a need. They have huge amount of resources to do > so, they may even locate their server farm (phy

Re: MTA

On 2021-07-05 10:22:26 -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: > What annoy my is that I am paying for a dedicated IP for my server (in > shared hosting) and I believe it must be a mis-configuration I've done, Yes, a mis-configuration in your case (see my other mail message). > I agree with

Re: MTA (corrected)

On 2021-07-05 10:32:27 -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: > > What is this 162.213.253.79 IP address? > > The IP address 162.213.253.79 is the dedicated IP I rent from Namecheap. OK. > Can you control its reverse? > > > Good question, I'll need to go back read a bit on networking and

Re: MTA

On 2021-07-05 10:06:24 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 03:48:47PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > On 2021-07-05 09:35:22 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > [...] > > > Your "reverse" (PTR record for 162.213.253.79) doesn't match. Which is > > > to say, none of the "A" results

Re: MTA (corrected)

Hi, > premium58.web-hosting.com is not your SMTP submission server: > > $ host premium58.web-hosting.com > premium58.web-hosting.com has address 198.54.120.203 > The server premium58.web-hosting.com is hosted by NameCheap and is used by many of their user as part of their server farm. All the IP

Re: MTA

Hi Greg, On 2021-07-05 10:06 a.m., Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 03:48:47PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: >> On 2021-07-05 09:35:22 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: >> [...] >>> Your "reverse" (PTR record for 162.213.253.79) doesn't match. Which is >>> to say, none of the "A" results

Re: MTA

On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 03:48:47PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2021-07-05 09:35:22 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > [...] > > Your "reverse" (PTR record for 162.213.253.79) doesn't match. Which is > > to say, none of the "A" results from cyrania.com. match the original > > IP address of 162.21

Re: MTA

On 2021-07-05 09:41:02 -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: > Hi, > > On 2021-07-05 9:35 a.m., Greg Wooledge wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 09:23:03AM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside > > wrote: > >> Reporting-MTA: dns; premium58.web-hosting.com > >> > >> Action: failed > >> Fi

Re: MTA

On 2021-07-05 09:35:22 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: [...] > Your "reverse" (PTR record for 162.213.253.79) doesn't match. Which is > to say, none of the "A" results from cyrania.com. match the original > IP address of 162.213.253.79. > > Some SMTP receivers may care about that. [...] Yes, the rea

Re: MTA

Hi, On 2021-07-05 9:35 a.m., Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 09:23:03AM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside > wrote: >> Reporting-MTA: dns; premium58.web-hosting.com >> >> Action: failed >> Final-Recipient: rfc822;bjoern.ri...@greenbone.net >> Status: 5.0.0 >> Remote-MTA: dns; m

Re: MTA

On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 09:23:03AM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote: > Reporting-MTA: dns; premium58.web-hosting.com > > Action: failed > Final-Recipient: rfc822;bjoern.ri...@greenbone.net > Status: 5.0.0 > Remote-MTA: dns; mail.greenbone.net > Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 X-Host-Lookup-

Re: MTA takes so much time to start (at boot)

Ron Johnson wrote: > On 2010-03-21 08:25, Merciadri Luca wrote: >> Ron Johnson wrote: >>> On 2010-03-21 05:59, Merciadri Luca wrote: >>> Teemu Likonen writes: > I don't know answers to all your questions but sometimes I have had > similar problems. I fixed the slow startup by ans

Re: MTA takes so much time to start (at boot)

On 2010-03-21 08:25, Merciadri Luca wrote: Ron Johnson wrote: On 2010-03-21 05:59, Merciadri Luca wrote: Teemu Likonen writes: I don't know answers to all your questions but sometimes I have had similar problems. I fixed the slow startup by answering "Yes" to the debconf question Keep

Re: MTA takes so much time to start (at boot)

Ron Johnson wrote: > On 2010-03-21 05:59, Merciadri Luca wrote: > >> Teemu Likonen writes: >> >>> I don't know answers to all your questions but sometimes I have had >>> similar problems. I fixed the slow startup by answering "Yes" to the >>> debconf question >>> >>> Keep number of DNS-queries

Re: MTA takes so much time to start (at boot)

On 2010-03-21 05:59, Merciadri Luca wrote: Teemu Likonen writes: I don't know answers to all your questions but sometimes I have had similar problems. I fixed the slow startup by answering "Yes" to the debconf question Keep number of DNS-queries minimal (Dial-on-Demand)? Run "dpkg-recon

Re: MTA takes so much time to start (at boot)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Teemu Likonen writes: > I don't know answers to all your questions but sometimes I have had > similar problems. I fixed the slow startup by answering "Yes" to the > debconf question > > Keep number of DNS-queries minimal (Dial-on-Demand)? > > Run

Re: MTA takes so much time to start (at boot)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ron Johnson writes: > Is your MTA only doing local delivery or going out to the world? It goes out to the world. - -- Merciadri Luca See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/ - -- The weak can never forgive. Forgiveness is the attri

Re: MTA takes so much time to start (at boot)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nuno Magalhães writes: > I'd do some searching [1] before going to the list. Slow boot and mta? > Most likely dns-related, check the configs for a wait parameter and/or > disable the MTA's dns or something. > > HTH, > Nuno > > [1] http://linux.derkei

Re: MTA takes so much time to start (at boot)

* 2010-03-21 09:56 (+0100), Merciadri Luca wrote: > I think that it is a well-known thing that some MTAs (if not all) take > some time to start (at boot). > Does exim4 really need so much time to launch/start? If so, why? I > need it, and I cannot deactivate it, but this slows down my boot. I do

Re: MTA takes so much time to start (at boot)

On 2010-03-21 03:56, Merciadri Luca wrote: Hi, I think that it is a well-known thing that some MTAs (if not all) take some time to start (at boot). But I sometimes need to wait ~30 secs. with this output: == Starting MTA: == After this time, `exim4' is simply appended to this line. Does exim4

Re: MTA takes so much time to start (at boot)

On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 08:56, Merciadri Luca wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > I think that it is a well-known thing that some MTAs (if not all) take > some time to start (at boot). But I sometimes need to wait ~30 > secs. with this output: > > == > Starting MTA

Re: MTA experts: address rewriting depending on next hop

On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 12:04:05PM +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 10:16 -0600, lee wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 01:26:37PM +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote: > [snip] > > > Moreover you're quoting my hint to the link there. Look into > > > debian-devel archives, I won't rep

Re: MTA experts: address rewriting depending on next hop

On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 10:16 -0600, lee wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 01:26:37PM +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote: [snip] > > Moreover you're quoting my hint to the link there. Look into > > debian-devel archives, I won't repeat myself. > > Yeah, sure, I'm going to browse through the archives of d

Re: MTA experts: address rewriting depending on next hop

On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 01:26:37PM +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 00:57 -0600, lee wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 08:10:16AM +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote: > [SNIP] > > > Well, this was my last post in this thread, I'll grant you the final > > > word if you care, maybe you

Re: MTA experts: address rewriting depending on next hop

On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 00:57 -0600, lee wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 08:10:16AM +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote: [SNIP] > > Well, this was my last post in this thread, I'll grant you the final > > word if you care, maybe you can prove that Exim's FAQ 805 or 807 iirc > > the link is on d-d - is wro

Re: MTA experts: address rewriting depending on next hop

On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 08:10:16AM +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 23:04 -0600, lee wrote: > > Look at my headers: who cares? Unless you're an ISP or MSP or run the > > servers for a company, nobody is going to mind. > > That's wrong, as with HTTP and other text based protoc

Re: MTA experts: address rewriting depending on next hop

On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 12:23:28AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 2009-07-24 00:04, lee wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:32:43AM +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote: > [snip] >>> Look at the Received: headers in my mails, afaict winnegan.fake is no >>> valid domain outside my lan and using outside wou

Re: MTA experts: address rewriting depending on next hop

On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 23:04 -0600, lee wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:32:43AM +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote: > > Look at the Received: headers in my mails, afaict winnegan.fake is no > > valid domain outside my lan and using outside would provoke harsh > > reactions. > > Look at my headers:

Re: MTA experts: address rewriting depending on next hop

On 2009-07-24 00:04, lee wrote: On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:32:43AM +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote: [snip] Look at the Received: headers in my mails, afaict winnegan.fake is no valid domain outside my lan and using outside would provoke harsh reactions. Look at my headers: who cares? Unless you'

Re: MTA experts: address rewriting depending on next hop

On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:32:43AM +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote: > Oops, this one slipped by me since I have moved the question to > d-devel, sorry for not Ccing d-user. > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 16:10 -0600, lee wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 01:03:01PM +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote: > > > >

Re: MTA experts: address rewriting depending on next hop

Oops, this one slipped by me since I have moved the question to d-devel, sorry for not Ccing d-user. On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 16:10 -0600, lee wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 01:03:01PM +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote: > > > > Here's the question again: which one of the abundance of MTAs in > > Debia

Re: MTA experts: address rewriting depending on next hop

On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 01:03:01PM +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote: > > Here's the question again: which one of the abundance of MTAs in > Debian is capable of address rewriting depending on destination? Exim4 can do this. If I understand you right, you want to rewrite the addresses of mail that i

Re: MTA experts: address rewriting depending on next hop

On 2009-07-21 07:05, Siggy Brentrup wrote: On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 06:35 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: [snip] Either you or I have misconfigured Postfix, because internal email comes to me as $u...@haggis.homelan, ... Must be you, did you look at the Received: headers in my message? I looked at y

Re: MTA experts: address rewriting depending on next hop

On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 06:35 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: [snip] > Either you or I have misconfigured Postfix, because internal email > comes to me as $u...@haggis.homelan, ... Must be you, did you look at the Received: headers in my message? I looked at yours, no Postfix involved up to liszt.debia

Re: MTA experts: address rewriting depending on next hop

On 2009-07-21 06:03, Siggy Brentrup wrote: Hi List, to start with, it's not a vital problem, I only want to fix sth annoying me. As quite a number among you, I'm running a LAN connected to the big world via switched ADSL. I'm looking for a MTA that is capable of rewriting addresses *only* on m

Re: MTA

On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 12:52:47PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Wed,08.Jul.09, 01:43:02, lee wrote: > > > > Exim gives you control over the resources it uses. This allows you to > > set up the MTA in such a way that it remains fully operational even > > when having to deal with enourmous amou

Re: MTA

Steve Kemp wrote: Its a religious argument and one that gets repeated every six months or so. Pick one, either the default or the one that your most knowledgeable local person prefers. I'm comfortable with sendmail, qmail and postfix, work for a company with a couple of thousand installs

Re: MTA

On Wed,08.Jul.09, 01:43:02, lee wrote: > > Exim gives you control over the resources it uses. This allows you to > set up the MTA in such a way that it remains fully operational even > when having to deal with enourmous amounts of mail. I don't know if > postfix has features like that ... Postfi

Re: MTA

On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 10:14:13PM +0200, Pawel Cholewinski wrote: > Hi > > I want to install MTA in my network. I want to know which mail transfer > agent is recommended (postfix, exim, sendmail or other else) and why. > And which is unsafe and why. You need to give information about what exactl

Re: MTA

Obviously it's the apple: - the juice doesn't stick to your hands - you can choose to peel it or not - it comes in different colors - it hasn't so much chemicals on it's skin - it's the fruit of seduction in opposite to a plain meaningless orange - it cleans your teeth - it's very easy to cut so

Re: MTA

On Tue Jul 07, 2009 at 18:16:33 +0100, kj wrote: > Does anyone know of a up-to-date report of MTA market share? I'm only > finding fairly old ones. Most people don't care - they pick one and stick with it. Its a religious argument and one that gets repeated every six months or so. Pick on

Re: MTA

Does anyone know of a up-to-date report of MTA market share? I'm only finding fairly old ones. thanks --kj -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: MTA

Hi, On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 10:14:13PM +0200, Pawel Cholewinski wrote: > Hi > > I want to install MTA in my network. I want to know which mail transfer > agent is recommended (postfix, exim, sendmail or other else) and why. > And which is unsafe and why. Debian installer chooses exim4 but no pro

Re: MTA

Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.: > In <20090706212028.gd31...@wasteland.homelinux.net>, Jochen Schulz wrote: >> >> I would avoid Sendmail since it is *really* old and hard to configure. > > Sendmail gets more modern all the time, but m4 is quite the beast for > configuration files. Still, if you learn i

Re: MTA

I recommend following this tutorial by Christoph Haas: http://workaround.org/articles/ispmail-etch/ which will soon be updated for Debian 5.0 Lenny. There's a community around it, reached through a mailing list, which gives you a fairly good backing when you need help. The tutorial is used by a lot

Re: MTA

In <20090706212028.gd31...@wasteland.homelinux.net>, Jochen Schulz wrote: >Pawel Cholewinski: >> I want to install MTA in my network. I want to know which mail transfer >> agent is recommended (postfix, exim, sendmail or other else) and why. >> And which is unsafe and why. > >I would avoid Sendmail

Re: MTA

Pawel Cholewinski: > > I want to install MTA in my network. I want to know which mail transfer > agent is recommended (postfix, exim, sendmail or other else) and why. > And which is unsafe and why. I would avoid Sendmail since it is *really* old and hard to configure. Exim is Debian's default MT

Re: MTA

In <4a525b15.7050...@wp.pl>, Pawel Cholewinski wrote: >I want to install MTA in my network. I want to know which mail transfer >agent is recommended (postfix, exim, sendmail or other else) and why. >And which is unsafe and why. http://lmgtfy.com/?q=mta+comparison&l=1 (which leads to:) http://shear

Re: MTA slow to start

On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 01:13:21AM -0500, Tyler Smith wrote: > > I'm still not clear on the purpose of exim4. I understand that the > system will on occassion send me a message, but in several months on > Sarge this has never happened. I get all my mail via a pop account - > does exim4 know my

Re: MTA slow to start

Tyler Smith wrote: Thanks everyone for your responses. At present I've switched it off using init scripts, following advice received off-list. I'm still not clear on the purpose of exim4. I understand that the system will on occassion send me a message, but in several months on Sarge this ha

Re: MTA slow to start

Thanks everyone for your responses. At present I've switched it off using init scripts, following advice received off-list. I'm still not clear on the purpose of exim4. I understand that the system will on occassion send me a message, but in several months on Sarge this has never happened. I g

Re: MTA slow to start

Am 2005-12-22 22:22:19, schrieb Tyler Smith: > During boot up it takes about 30 seconds for MTA to start for my Etch > install. With Sarge on the same box this takes less than a second. Can I > fix this somehow? I'm running a single desktop computer, connected via > an NIC through a router to hi

Re: MTA slow to start

On Monday, 26 December 2005 at 15:08:19 +0200, David Baron wrote: > >> > During boot up it takes about 30 seconds for MTA to start for my Etch > >> > install. With Sarge on the same box this takes less than a second. Can > >> > I fix this somehow? > > > >> Changing "mybox" to "mybox.localdomain" in

Re: MTA slow to start

>> > During boot up it takes about 30 seconds for MTA to start for my Etch >> > install. With Sarge on the same box this takes less than a second. Can >> > I fix this somehow? > >> Changing "mybox" to "mybox.localdomain" in /etc/hostame works >> for me. I can't take credit for this fix. I read it h

Re: MTA slow to start

On 2005-12-24, David Baron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > During boot up it takes about 30 seconds for MTA to start for my Etch >> > install. With Sarge on the same box this takes less than a second. Can >> > I fix this somehow? >> >> Changing "mybox" to "mybox.localdomain" in /etc/hostname works

Re: MTA slow to start

On Saturday 24 December 2005 16:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > During boot up it takes about 30 seconds for MTA to start for my Etch > > install. With Sarge on the same box this takes less than a second. Can > > I fix this somehow? > > Changing "mybox" to "mybox.localdomain" in /etc/hostame work

Re: MTA slow to start

So does mine (using exim4/heavy) from Sid. Always did. Less than a second? On Friday 23 December 2005 05:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > During boot up it takes about 30 seconds for MTA to start for my Etch > install. With Sarge on the same box this takes less than a second. Can I > fix this some

Re: MTA slow to start

On 2005-12-23, Tyler Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > During boot up it takes about 30 seconds for MTA to start for my Etch > install. With Sarge on the same box this takes less than a second. Can > I fix this somehow? Changing "mybox" to "mybox.localdomain" in /etc/hostame works for me. I ca

Re: MTA slow to start

On 22:22 Thu 22 Dec , Tyler Smith wrote: > During boot up it takes about 30 seconds for MTA to start for my Etch > install. With Sarge on the same box this takes less than a second. Can I > fix this somehow? I'm running a single desktop computer, connected via > an NIC through a router to hi

Re: MTA: exim or postfix?

On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 03:19:09PM +0200, MatB wrote: > Hi, > for what i read they're both feature-complete, secure and stable. > Does anybody know any substancial difference between them? > I would prefer one that stores emails in single files, to make incremental > backup efficient. Is it suppor

Re: MTA: exim or postfix?

On Friday 29 July 2005 15:19, MatB wrote: > Hi, Hi, > I would prefer one that stores emails in single files Both support it. It is a matter of format. Read this: http://www.google.com/search?q=mailbox+vs+maildir -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". T

Re: MTA dependencies ???

Michael D Schleif wrote: > I have a box on which I want to install qmail from source. In order to > get it to run, I need to remove/purge *all* other MTA's (e.g., exim, > nullmailer, &c.) > > In doing so, there are DEB's with MTA dependencies, and removing/purging > DEB MTA's _also_ removes thes

Re: MTA dependencies ???

Michael D Schleif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have a box on which I want to install qmail from source. In order to > get it to run, I need to remove/purge *all* other MTA's (e.g., exim, > nullmailer, &c.) Look for packages that provide mail-transport-agent. > In doing so, there are DEB's wi

Re: MTA dependencies ???

On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 11:30:08AM -0500, Michael D Schleif wrote: > I have a box on which I want to install qmail from source. In order to > get it to run, I need to remove/purge *all* other MTA's (e.g., exim, > nullmailer, &c.) Gods only know why, qmail sucks and the license is ridiculous. > I

Re: MTA dependencies ???

On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 11:30:08AM -0500, Michael D Schleif wrote: > Yes, I have seen this discussed before; but, I cannot find the Debian > consensus solution. Which search criteria ought I to use in the > archives? > > I have a box on which I want to install qmail from source. In order to > ge

RE: MTA dependencies ???

I guess u need to build QMail from source "the Debian way". Create a .deb from the sources. When you install this deb, I guess apt will ask you if you want to remove the other MTA. Probably more info in de docs on debian.org. Good luck! > -Original Message- > From: Michael D. Schleif [ma

Re: MTA help

On Tuesday 11 November 2003 23:07, Eric Walstad wrote: > > I gave up because I didn't know it *could* be set up with one file. I > can understand that breaking it up into multiple files can be nice for > complex configurations, but it would've been better for me if it was > one file. How did you

Re: MTA help

On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 03:07:57PM -0800, Eric Walstad wrote: > > I can't tell you how to edit the complicated new way of dealing with > > the configuration - I gave up an made one big config file. > I gave up because I didn't know it *could* be set up with one file. I > can understand that break

Re: MTA help

Hi Alan, On Tuesday 11 November 2003 13:57, Alan Chandler wrote: > On Monday 10 November 2003 23:07, Eric Walstad wrote: > > I'm wanting to setup a Debian box that'll suck down pop email from > > an ISP for a few local users and then serve those email up via pop3 > > or imap on the LAN. Following

Re: MTA help

On Monday 10 November 2003 23:07, Eric Walstad wrote: > Greetings kind debianites, > > I'm in the process of learning MTA admin. My head is about to explode. > > I'm wanting to setup a Debian box that'll suck down pop email from an > ISP for a few local users and then serve those email up via pop3

Re: MTA help

On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 08:05:34 -0800 Eric Walstad wrote: > > Now I would like to find out a way to setup usernames and passwords for > courier-imap that are different than the user login. I'd prefer not > sending the system login info over the lan. See the courier info on authuserdb, edit /etc/c

RE: MTA help

On Monday 10 November 2003 17:10, Benedict Verheyen wrote: > I don't know courier-mta but i would go back to exim4. [...] Thanks Benedict. I have it working now. I dropped back to exim (not exim4) and followed the nice howto at: w

Re: MTA help

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 15:07:58 -0800, Eric Walstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Greetings kind debianites, > > I'm in the process of learning MTA admin. My head is about to > explode. > > I'm wanting to setup a Debian box that'll suck down pop email from an > ISP

Re: MTA help

Eric Walstad wrote: > Greetings kind debianites, > > I'm in the process of learning MTA admin. My head is about to > explode. > > I'm wanting to setup a Debian box that'll suck down pop email from an > ISP for a few local users and then serve those email up via pop3 or > imap on the LAN. Follow

Re: MTA help

On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 17:07, Eric Walstad wrote: > Greetings kind debianites, > > I'm in the process of learning MTA admin. My head is about to explode. > > I'm wanting to setup a Debian box that'll suck down pop email from an > ISP for a few local users and then serve those email up via pop3 o

Re: ssmtp for Hylafax? (Was: Re: MTA recomendations?)

On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 02:33:28PM -0700, Kevin Beauchamp wrote: | On 31 Jan 2002 15:10:52 -0500, Timothy H. Keitt wrote: | >On Thu, 2002-01-31 at 13:55, Stan Brown wrote: | | >> I'm seting up a new woody box for my wife to use. I need a recomendation on | >> an easy to set up, reliable MTA. | >>

Re: MTA recomendations?

On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 08:00:56PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 01:55:59PM -0500, Stan Brown wrote: > > I'm seting up a new woody box for my wife to use. I need a recomendation on > > an easy to set up, reliable MTA. > I'd recommend qmail (fast, reliable, secure) or po

Re: MTA recomendations?

On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 01:55:59PM -0500, Stan Brown wrote: | I'm seting up a new woody box for my wife to use. I need a | recomendation on an easy to set up, reliable MTA. I like exim. The docs are _excellent_ and the config is easy to work with. -D -- Whoever gives heed to instruction prosp

Re: MTA recomendations?

On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Stan Brown wrote: > I'm seting up a new woody box for my wife to use. I need a recomendation on > an easy to set up, reliable MTA. exim. -- Baloo

ssmtp for Hylafax? (Was: Re: MTA recomendations?)

On 31 Jan 2002 15:10:52 -0500, Timothy H. Keitt wrote: >On Thu, 2002-01-31 at 13:55, Stan Brown wrote: >> I'm seting up a new woody box for my wife to use. I need a recomendation on >> an easy to set up, reliable MTA. >> >Also take a look at the ssmtp package. I am interested in this particular

Re: MTA recomendations?

Also take a look at the ssmtp package. T. On Thu, 2002-01-31 at 13:55, Stan Brown wrote: > I'm seting up a new woody box for my wife to use. I need a recomendation on > an easy to set up, reliable MTA. > > Heres the setup, the box will realy all outgoing mail through a local ISP. > It will run f

Re: MTA recomendations?

also sprach [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.31.2000 +0100]: > I'd recommend qmail (fast, reliable, secure) or postfix (fast, reliable, > secure, easy to configure (or so I'v heard - haven't tried it yet)). qmail? qmail? oh, wait... > (Did you hear that? Sounds like a flamewar comin

Re: MTA recomendations?

On Thu, 2002-01-31 at 19:55, Stan Brown wrote: > I'm seting up a new woody box for my wife to use. I need a recomendation on > an easy to set up, reliable MTA. > > Heres the setup, the box will realy all outgoing mail through a local ISP. > It will run fetchmail to retireve mail from that ISP, whi

Re: MTA recomendations?

On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 01:55:59PM -0500, Stan Brown wrote: > I'm seting up a new woody box for my wife to use. I need a recomendation on > an easy to set up, reliable MTA. > > Heres the setup, the box will realy all outgoing mail through a local ISP. > It will run fetchmail to retireve mail from

  1   2   >