On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 01:12:33PM +0200, oivvio polite wrote:
> client = msg.getheader("X-Mailer") or msg.getheader("User-Agent") or
> "unknown"
You're missing X-Newsreader - some people use newsreaders, which might
be sending that.
--
Colin Watson [EM
On 20 Sep 2001, John Hasler wrote:
JH> I wrote:
JH> > Are you saying viruses can't use Debian? Wouldn't that violate the DFSG?
JH>
JH> Johnny writes:
JH> > Tim said _Outlook_ messages. Since Outlook does not run on Debian, viruses
JH> > that need Outlook can not use Debian to spread.
JH>
JH> We
I wrote:
> Are you saying viruses can't use Debian? Wouldn't that violate the DFSG?
Johnny writes:
> Tim said _Outlook_ messages. Since Outlook does not run on Debian, viruses
> that need Outlook can not use Debian to spread.
Well, sure. Everyone knows that viruses only work on Windows, so of c
Also sprach Tony Crawford:
> Funny, I'm not in the list, but I can't see where that pipeline
> leaves out those of us with "Debian" in the first "Received"
> stamp.
>
> T.
Could you elaborate on that? Is there a way of discriminating subscribed
posters from unsubscribed posters by watching the h
Also sprach Nathan E Norman:
> Also, a more fair count would associate senders with user-agents ...
> if I send 100 emails with mutt, and 10 other users send 10 emails each
> with Outlook, which is more popular? (From a number of users
> standpoint, Outlook should be the answer). Your script do
oivvio polite wrote (on 19 Sep 2001 at 11:27):
> Well not exactly dominating. Maybe not secretly either. But it
sounded
> good. This oneliner from the department of utterly useless info
tells
> it all:
>
> agrep "^User-Agent: ,^X-Mailer: " user|perl -ne 'chomp;/.+?:
(.?.?.?[^\d,\(,\[,\/]{1,14
>Tim Moss writes:
>> Well then, don't forget to count how many of the Outlook messages were
>> sent by viruses and not actual people.
>
>Are you saying viruses can't use Debian? Wouldn't that violate the DFSG?
Tim said _Outlook_ messages. Since Outlook does not run on Debian, viruses
that need
Tim Moss writes:
> Well then, don't forget to count how many of the Outlook messages were
> sent by viruses and not actual people.
Are you saying viruses can't use Debian? Wouldn't that violate the DFSG?
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, Wisconsin
* Tim Moss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Well then, don't forget to count how many of the Outlook messages were
> sent by viruses and not actual people.
That'd be what, about 90%? ;)
(couldn't resist...)
Mike Pfleger
There's seventy brilliant people on earth.
Where are they hiding?
"Yashar" -C
Also, a more fair count would associate senders with user-agents ...
if I send 100 emails with mutt, and 10 other users send 10 emails each
with Outlook, which is more popular? (From a number of users
standpoint, Outlook should be the answer). Your script doesn't account
for this.
Well then,
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 09:01:45AM -0500, DvB wrote:
> oivvio polite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Well not exactly dominating. Maybe not secretly either. But it sounded good.
> > This oneliner from the department of utterly useless info tells it all:
> >
> > agrep "^User-Agent: ,^X-Mailer: "
oivvio polite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well not exactly dominating. Maybe not secretly either. But it sounded good.
> This oneliner from the department of utterly useless info tells it all:
>
> agrep "^User-Agent: ,^X-Mailer: " user|perl -ne 'chomp;/.+?:
> (.?.?.?[^\d,\(,\[,\/]{1,14}).*/; $
Thus spake oivvio polite on Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 11:27:27AM +0200:
> Well not exactly dominating. Maybe not secretly either. But it sounded good.
> This oneliner from the department of utterly useless info tells it all:
lol !
Somebody's overdosing on SlashDot :-)
Romain
--
If you're going to d
13 matches
Mail list logo
