Re: M$ licenses Unix

2003-05-27 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 11:50:31AM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote: > Oh, so where do postings to the newsgroup go? They stay in the newsgroup. - -- .''`. Baloo Ursidae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian admin and user `. `'` `- Debian -

Re: M$ licenses Unix

2003-05-27 Thread Joris
>> >> http://jopa.studentenweb.org/debian - Blackdown Java 1.4.1/gcc3.2 debs >> > >> > BTW -- I installed the Blackdown debs and I still don't have >> > application/x-java-vm handler. Did I miss a step (or something >> > otherwise obvious)? >> >> note that the package on this site are compiled

Re: M$ licenses Unix

2003-05-27 Thread Bill Moseley
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 10:24:14PM +0200, Joris wrote: > > Oh, so where do postings to the newsgroup go? > > they appear on the newsgroup, but don't get posted through to the list. > we don't want to risk a loop in such a high-traffic list Makes sense about the loops. So there may be replies to

Re: M$ licenses Unix

2003-05-27 Thread Joris
>> > I'm sorry, I understand someone that might need the help of debian-user >> > but not want to deal with the bulk of the email, but I just don't see it >> > as that much trouble to subscribe, post the question and then >> > unsubscribe. >> >> well, I do. among many others, I read the list as a

Re: M$ licenses Unix

2003-05-27 Thread Joris
>> > I'm sorry, I understand someone that might need the help of debian-user >> > but not want to deal with the bulk of the email, but I just don't see it >> > as that much trouble to subscribe, post the question and then >> > unsubscribe. >> >> well, I do. among many others, I read the list as a

Re: M$ licenses Unix

2003-05-27 Thread Mark L. Kahnt
On Tue, 2003-05-27 at 14:50, Bill Moseley wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 07:53:33PM +0200, Joris wrote: > > > I'm sorry, I understand someone that might need the help of debian-user > > > but not want to deal with the bulk of the email, but I just don't see it > > > as that much trouble to subscr

Re: M$ licenses Unix

2003-05-27 Thread Jamin W. Collins
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 07:53:33PM +0200, Joris wrote: > > I'm sorry, I understand someone that might need the help of > > debian-user but not want to deal with the bulk of the email, but I > > just don't see it as that much trouble to subscribe, post the > > question and then unsubscribe. > > wel

Re: M$ licenses Unix

2003-05-27 Thread Bill Moseley
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 07:53:33PM +0200, Joris wrote: > > I'm sorry, I understand someone that might need the help of debian-user > > but not want to deal with the bulk of the email, but I just don't see it > > as that much trouble to subscribe, post the question and then > > unsubscribe. > > wel

Re: M$ licenses Unix

2003-05-27 Thread Jamin W. Collins
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 10:03:03AM -0700, Bill Moseley wrote: > Anyway, the risk of legal action would seem like an impelling reason to > have subscription-only lists. That, and to keep spammers from using > lists as a type of open relay. I've always been for subscription only lists. Every list

Re: M$ licenses Unix

2003-05-27 Thread Joris
> I'm sorry, I understand someone that might need the help of debian-user > but not want to deal with the bulk of the email, but I just don't see it > as that much trouble to subscribe, post the question and then > unsubscribe. well, I do. among many others, I read the list as a newsgroup. having

Re: M$ licenses Unix

2003-05-27 Thread Bill Moseley
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 09:19:25AM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 10:36:53AM -0400, Mike M wrote: > > On Tuesday 27 May 2003 09:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > You have to own the copyright... > > > > Thought this one was gone? I would think that this post will hurt h