On Wed, Dec 01, 1999 at 09:39:50PM -0600, Daniel Yang wrote:
> Eventually, I made my web server and my own domain
> (www.mydomain.com) running, but my ISP, mindspring told me
> that I am not allowed to run a web server through a dialup
> account and they can't do anything for me if I want to run m
Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> Ironically, your lines are too long.
> --
> Peter Galbraith, research scientist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Maurice Lamontagne Institute, Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada
> P.O. Box 1000, Mont-Joli Qc, G5H 3Z4 Canada. 418-775-0852 FAX: 775-0546
> 6623'rd
Paul McHale writes:
> >
> > So, lots of reasons not to use Outlook. I'm curious, why do you
> > find it to be the
> > best available? What does it offer that, say, Netscape can't do
> > with a good IMAP
> > server?
> >
>
> Thanks for the reply !
>
> The best part of Outlook is it's i
Thursday, December 02, 1999, 2:03:33 PM, Adam wrote:
> In one standard (I don't know which), = is a special character used for
> end-of-line and otherwise as an escape character
MIME
> But you're right, Outlook can be made to send in plain text, and your (Paul)
> emails have been good about t
Paul McHale wrote:
> The best part of Outlook is it's integration. It works with my Pilot, has a
> PIM which is descent.
Descent was a great game. Alas, it is no PIM.
> Outlook has [sic] the best one stop application.
Thems fightin' words. Prepare for ample flame-age, dude.
>
> So, lots of reasons not to use Outlook. I'm curious, why do you
> find it to be the
> best available? What does it offer that, say, Netscape can't do
> with a good IMAP
> server?
>
Thanks for the reply !
The best part of Outlook is it's integration. It works with my Pilot, has a
PIM which
I always heard that outlook was a piece of shit, based on mostly the fact
that it is so prone to virus spreading. Sure there may be ways
"around" this but the average user isn't going to know about them.
My first(and so far, only) bad experience with Outlook was after a server
upgrade(I saw hundr
Paul McHale wrote:
> Steve,
>
> I agree that I am using MS Outlook. I think it is the best program available
> for
> my use. I don't understand your difficulty. I forwarded the message to my
> linux
> server and opened it with mutt. It came across in plain text. I double
> checked
> the ou
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 05:11:37AM -0500, Paul McHale wrote:
>
> I agree that I am using MS Outlook. I think it is the best program
> available for my use. I don't understand your difficulty. I forwarded the
> message to my linux server and opened it with mutt. It came across in plain
> text.
o you as quotation at the end of my message.
And I would delete all this stuff:
> paul
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Lamb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 4:45 AM
> To: Paul McHale
> Cc: Daniel Yang; debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Sub
>What do you mean by co-location? Many DSL providers
>won't allow users
>run
>their servers also. Could you give the names of who
>does.
I believe that flashcom.com will allow a single server
to be run from (some of) their dsl accounts, perhaps
with a small extra monthly fee. They do have more
c
Lamb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 4:45 AM
To: Paul McHale
Cc: Daniel Yang; debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: OT: WHAT THE F**K!!! (Was: Re: Looking for right ISP)
Importance: Low
Wednesday, December 01, 1999, 11:45:56 PM, Paul wrote:
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Out
Wednesday, December 01, 1999, 11:45:56 PM, Paul wrote:
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
OK, pardon me for being a bit peeved but you and Daniel are both posting
with MS *CRAP* into a Linux forum, using HTML and quoting the completely wrong
way. Cut it out!!!
I mean, ge
If all
you want to do is run a web server, you might consider http://www.addr.com. I stumbled into them the
other day. They offer domain and web hosting for under $10. They
support almost any web feature imaginable in a high end account for under $15,
including databases. Unless you need
Hello,
I have no DSL but a 2 MBit cable modem. It is like the DSL but cheeper.
I had payed for an individual account 48 US$ and a dynamic IP-Address.
Then I have changed to individual account with a fixed IP-Address but
now I must pay 65 US$.
Now I am ISP and I use a proffessional account wh
Wednesday, December 01, 1999, 8:59:37 PM, Daniel wrote:
> What do you mean by co-location? Many DSL providers won't allow users run
> their servers also. Could you give the names of who does.
Colocation means the server is located at the ISPs facility. Many DSL
providers *do* allow servers to
ow users run
> their servers also. Could you give the names of who does.
>
> Thanks
> Daniel
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Phil Brutsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Daniel Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Debian-User
> Date: Wednesday, December 01,
f who does.
Thanks
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Phil Brutsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Daniel Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Debian-User
Date: Wednesday, December 01, 1999 10:17 PM
Subject: Re: Looking for right ISP
>A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, som
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> Hi, everyone.
> Eventually, I made my web server and my own domain (www.mydomain.com)
> running, but my ISP, mindspring told me that I am not allowed to run a
> web server through a dialup account and they can't do anything for me
> if I
19 matches
Mail list logo
