Hal Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tuesday 18 November 2008, s. keeling wrote:
> >
> > Don't ask him about Paris Hilton.
>
> I don't even bother with (media) sluts.
And chain hotels in Idaho?
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(*)http://blinkynet.
On 11/19/08 13:04, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Wednesday 19 November 2008, Celejar wrote:
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:13:19 +0100 (CET)
François Cerbelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le Mer 19 novembre 2008 00:45, s. keeling a écrit :
Hal Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Sunday 16 November 2008, Ron Joh
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:04:24 -0500
Hal Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> Question: When we respond and include Ron's line in our post as a quote,
> does that fit under Godwin, too?
I think we need a Debian GR on that.
Celejar
--
mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPG
On Wednesday 19 November 2008, Celejar wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:13:19 +0100 (CET)
>
> François Cerbelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Le Mer 19 novembre 2008 00:45, s. keeling a écrit :
> > > Hal Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >> On Sunday 16 November 2008, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > >> > I
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:13:19 +0100 (CET)
François Cerbelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Le Mer 19 novembre 2008 00:45, s. keeling a écrit :
> > Hal Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> On Sunday 16 November 2008, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >> >
> >> > If you don't agree with me, you are worse than Hit
Le Mer 19 novembre 2008 00:45, s. keeling a écrit :
> Hal Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Sunday 16 November 2008, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> >
>> > If you don't agree with me, you are worse than Hitler!!!
>>
>> You mean there are people who agree with you?!?
He can, I do agree with him. So, I am
On Tuesday 18 November 2008, s. keeling wrote:
> Hal Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Seriously, the reason I've been thinking about keeping the mail on
> > the sending system is to make reference easier -- in case the mail
> > server goes wrong or something. In the past it seems like things
> >
On 11/18/08 17:45, s. keeling wrote:
Hal Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Sunday 16 November 2008, Ron Johnson wrote:
If you don't agree with me, you are worse than Hitler!!!
You mean there are people who agree with you?!?
Well, I agree with him that you ought to turn off HTML for mail to t
Hal Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Seriously, the reason I've been thinking about keeping the mail on the
> sending system is to make reference easier -- in case the mail server
> goes wrong or something. In the past it seems like things go wrong in
> bunches, so I've started to plan fo
Hal Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sunday 16 November 2008, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >
> > If you don't agree with me, you are worse than Hitler!!!
>
> You mean there are people who agree with you?!?
Well, I agree with him that you ought to turn off HTML for mail to the
list.
People used to get
On Monday 17 November 2008, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 11/16/08 23:51, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> > On Monday 17 November 2008, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > ...
> >
> >>> Fetchmail pulls it in to a server from the ISP. I thought about
> >>> something like ssmtp that would send the email from each system
> >>> to
On 11/16/08 23:51, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Monday 17 November 2008, Ron Johnson wrote:
...
Fetchmail pulls it in to a server from the ISP. I thought about
something like ssmtp that would send the email from each system to
that server, but there are reasons I wanted to just pull it from
each machi
On Monday 17 November 2008, Ron Johnson wrote:
...
> > Fetchmail pulls it in to a server from the ISP. I thought about
> > something like ssmtp that would send the email from each system to
> > that server, but there are reasons I wanted to just pull it from
> > each machine. I guess I could stil
On 11/16/08 20:10, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Sunday 16 November 2008, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 11/16/08 13:42, Hal Vaughan wrote:
I'm looking for a simple MTA. I have some systems that can generate
email to users from programs like cron or mdadm and on at least 2
systems I currently have no MTA. I'd l
On Sunday 16 November 2008, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 11/16/08 13:42, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> > I'm looking for a simple MTA. I have some systems that can generate
> > email to users from programs like cron or mdadm and on at least 2
> > systems I currently have no MTA. I'd like to put on the simplest
>
On 11/16/08 13:42, Hal Vaughan wrote:
I'm looking for a simple MTA. I have some systems that can generate
email to users from programs like cron or mdadm and on at least 2
systems I currently have no MTA. I'd like to put on the simplest MTA I
can (and that includes simple to configure) that wil
On Sunday 16 November 2008 14:22, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> Exim is the default on Debian. It is well supported and should be
> trivial to set up for such a basic setup.
Yeah, this is the local mail only (or similar) option from debconf.
> dovecot is a relatively straight-forward server for pop3 and
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 02:42:39PM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> I'm looking for a simple MTA. I have some systems that can generate
> email to users from programs like cron or mdadm and on at least 2
> systems I currently have no MTA. I'd like to put on the simplest MTA I
> can (and that includ
18 matches
Mail list logo
