And for the sake of completeness, yes, NFS clients were able to mount the
exported volume on this server once the nfs-kernel-server startup
completed. And that makes a lot of sense to me now, because the entire
issue was in rpcbind's attempt to verify that it could connect to
127.0.0.1, which does
Hello,
Thanks for the suggestions. The combination of checking
/etc/network/interfaces and verifying that rpcbind was listening on
127.0.0.1 led me in the right direction, and boy do I feel silly...
Somehow, my interfaces file was missing the loopback entry, so the loopback
interface showed in t
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> David Parker wrote:
>>
>> I have confirmed that rpc.statd is running, which I believe is the port
>> mapper in newer distributions.
>
> AFAIK rpc.statd is not a portmapper replacement. The two portmapper
> equivalents that I am aware of are:
>
David Parker wrote:
> root@test-vm-1:~# cat /etc/hosts
> 127.0.0.1localhostlocalhost
> 192.168.25.200 testbed.utica.edu testbed
> 192.168.25.201 test-vm-1.utica.edu test-vm-1
> 192.168.25.202 test-vm-2.utica.edu test-vm-2
> 192.168.25.203 test-vm-3.utica.edu test-vm-3
I missed asking the obvious question. Does the NFS server work? Are
you able to NFS mount it onto clients? Because this is the difference
between some runtime functionality problem and a boot time
functionality problem.
David Parker wrote:
> root@test-vm-1:~# cat /etc/hosts
> 127.0.0.1local
root@test-vm-1:~# cat /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1localhostlocalhost
192.168.25.200 testbed.utica.edu testbed
192.168.25.201 test-vm-1.utica.edu test-vm-1
192.168.25.202 test-vm-2.utica.edu test-vm-2
192.168.25.203 test-vm-3.utica.edu test-vm-3
192.168.25.204 test-vm-4.utica.
David Parker wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately, it looks like rpcbind is not the
> culprit. I verified that rpcbind installed and running:
>
>
> Anything else I can look into? FWIW, an strace shows that rpcbind gets
> stuck when trying to connect to a socket on the loopback interfac
Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately, it looks like rpcbind is not the
culprit. I verified that rpcbind installed and running:
root@test-vm-1:~# ps -ef | grep bind
root 1538 1 0 11:23 ?00:00:00 /sbin/rpcbind -w
root 28002 2289 0 15:17 pts/000:00:00 grep bind
I restart
David Parker wrote:
> I have confirmed that rpc.statd is running, which I believe is the port
> mapper in newer distributions.
AFAIK rpc.statd is not a portmapper replacement. The two portmapper
equivalents that I am aware of are:
portmap - RPC port mapper
rpcbind - converts RPC program numb
9 matches
Mail list logo