Re: Local address lookup

2002-09-12 Thread Bob Proulx
Jan Willem Stumpel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-12 20:38:41 +0200]: > 3. But it is not the whole truth, because (as I said) I have an >/etc/nsswitch.conf file on my machine, and it says > hosts: files dns >and still local lookups do not work (i.e. outside name servers >are

RE: Local address lookup

2002-09-12 Thread Jan Willem Stumpel
Carlos Henriques dos Santos wrote: > host.conf is obsolete, i think it was used by old libc5. > You must edit /etc/nsswitch.conf: > > hosts: files dns 1. When was this change made? Is it documented anywhere? (I could find no references on the Web). 2. There must be some truth i

RE: Local address lookup

2002-09-11 Thread Carlos Henriques dos Santos
Hello, On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 20:19, Jan Willem Stumpel wrote: > I seem to have a DNS problem indeed. When I run tcpdump in an X > window on jupiter and call > > telnet saturn > > in another window, I get a lot of packets beginning with > > 19:35:30.080780 jupiter.my.home.1024 > ns1.m

RE: Local address lookup

2002-09-11 Thread Jan Willem Stumpel
I seem to have a DNS problem indeed. When I run tcpdump in an X window on jupiter and call telnet saturn in another window, I get a lot of packets beginning with 19:35:30.080780 jupiter.my.home.1024 > ns1.myisp.nl.domain: 19522+ ? saturn. (23) 19:35:30.081839 jupiter.

RE: Local address lookup

2002-09-10 Thread Mike Kuhar
Hi Jan, I'll assume that you have the default gateway setup and a static route to your local net. Check /etc/nsswitch.conf to insure that you have the entry: hosts: files dns Also, for hosts on the same network, you don't have to specify domain names. So your entries should look like this /etc

Re: Local address lookup

2002-09-10 Thread nate
Jan Willem Stumpel said: > This is a follow-up to the thread "Local Net - delays in telnet > login" of last month. > > So it seems the identification "saturn --> 192.168.2.2" cannot be made > locally (i.e. on jupiter) although the identification > "192.168.2.2 --> saturn" can. What is wrong with