Aha...
So I assume that basically boils down to apt-get not being able to
resolve a dependency at a specific version and instead will always
look for and install the candidate version?
I need to stick to apt-get really - just because I dont want to re-do
2 tons of documentation ;o)
I have manage
On Jo, 01 iul 10, 22:06:49, Didster wrote:
>
> How can a package that is "not installable" then be installed??!
As you've shown in you 'apt-cache policy' those versions are not
'candidate' versions, but aptitude offers alternative solutions (one of
the benefits over apt-get), one of them being
I tried this, but it didn't help.
I gave package-system a unique name based on the version, but it did
the same thing. I didn't try giving all 3 packages their own name
based on version (nor would I want to!)
Thanks
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGN
Sort of - but it can actually do the install:
The following packages are BROKEN:
package-system
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
package-system: Depends: package1 (= 2.1.88) but it is not installable
Depends: package2 (= 2.1.88) but it is not installable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/01/2010 03:51 PM, Didster wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> We use a local apt repository as a means to distribute our own
> software. The software is not and will not ever be part of the
> official Debian archives. Our software consists of 4 packages,
On Jo, 01 iul 10, 20:51:05, Didster wrote:
[...]
> Then "apt-get install package-system" installs package-system 2.0.2
> along with V2.1.99 of the three packages. But "apt-get install
> package-system=2.0.1" fails as follows:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies.
> package-syste
>On Wednesday 11 January 2006 07:27,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > Is there any way to moving a /usr/local installation into apt, meeting
>> > dependencies, etc. Most information is in the configure program with the
>> > application being compiled.
>>
>> Look at checkinstall.
>Yes, I got this on
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 07:27,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Is there any way to moving a /usr/local installation into apt, meeting
> > dependencies, etc. Most information is in the configure program with the
> > application being compiled.
>
> Look at checkinstall.
Yes, I got this one for th
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 09:26:27PM +0200, David Baron wrote:
> Is there any way to moving a /usr/local installation into apt, meeting
> dependencies, etc. Most information is in the configure program with the
> application being compiled.
Look at checkinstall.
signature.asc
Description: Digita
On 2004-04-07, Pete Clarke penned:
> Hi there,
>
> I would like to run a local "apt" mirror for the machines on my local
> network. At the moment all Debian machines independantly do their own
> updates & dist-upgrades via one of the Debian web mirrors. This
> results in many duplicated downloads,
Hi there,
Thanks for the sugesstions ... I will try apt-mirror later on and see what
happens.
Cheers,
Pete.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 7 Apr 2004 14:19:52 +0100
"Pete Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to run a local "apt" mirror for the machines on my local
> network. At the moment all Debian machines independantly do their own
> updates & dist-upgrades via one of the Debian web mirrors.
> This results in
12 matches
Mail list logo
