On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 03:30:09 +0200, Jerry Van Brimmer wrote:
>> The minus sign doesn't mean "not installed". It means "not loaded".
>> Anyway, agp_try_unsupported isn't a silver bullet. If there's a working
>> patch as Roberto described, then use that.
>
> Do I 'have' to have a 2.4.2x kernel to a
Sebastian Kapfer wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 03:30:12 +0200, Jerry Van Brimmer wrote:
But, when I look in modconf, it shows a "-" sign after agpgart,
indicating that it is not installed, but it is. What would I have to do
to straighten this out?
The minus sign doesn't mean "not installed". It me
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 03:30:12 +0200, Jerry Van Brimmer wrote:
> But, when I look in modconf, it shows a "-" sign after agpgart,
> indicating that it is not installed, but it is. What would I have to do
> to straighten this out?
The minus sign doesn't mean "not installed". It means "not loaded".
An
Antony Gelberg wrote:
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 04:29:29PM -0700, Jerry Van Brimmer wrote:
I was trying to install the agpgart module using modconf, into my kernel,
when I got this message:
Installing module agpgart. If the device isn't there, or isn't configured
correctly, this could cause your
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 04:29:29PM -0700, Jerry Van Brimmer wrote:
> I was trying to install the agpgart module using modconf, into my kernel,
> when I got this message:
>
> Installing module agpgart. If the device isn't there, or isn't configured
> correctly, this could cause your system to pau
5 matches
Mail list logo
