Re: Loading kernel modules for usb stick

2007-04-18 Thread Wayne Topa
Rainer Dorsch([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > Am Donnerstag, 15. März 2007 02:56 schrieb Kevin Mark: > > I think the issue with the modules not loading would be related to the > > pciids database and manybe a needed udev rule. If you want to document > > it, wiki.debian.org would be

Re: Loading kernel modules for usb stick

2007-04-10 Thread Rainer Dorsch
Am Donnerstag, 15. März 2007 02:56 schrieb Kevin Mark: > I think the issue with the modules not loading would be related to the > pciids database and manybe a needed udev rule. If you want to document > it, wiki.debian.org would be one place. The solution for the issue was that rt2x00-sources in e

Re: Loading kernel modules for usb stick

2007-03-14 Thread Kevin Mark
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 10:03:24PM +0100, Rainer Dorsch wrote: > Hello, > > I got a D-link DWL-G122 today. It was easy to get that working under etch. > For > reference, if anybody has a similar problem: > > # module-assistant prepare # May not be needed > # module-assistant g

Re: Loading kernel modules for usb stick

2007-03-14 Thread Wayne Topa
Rainer Dorsch([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > Hello, > > I got a D-link DWL-G122 today. It was easy to get that working under etch. > For > reference, if anybody has a similar problem: > > # module-assistant prepare # May not be needed > # module-assistant get r

Re: Loading Kernel Modules

2004-11-17 Thread Andreas Janssen
Hello Paul Tsai (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: > Andreas Janssen wrote: > >>>I'm compiling a custom kernel 2.6.6 on my Toshiba laptop. One of the >>>things I've noticed is that it keeps loading the intel_agp and the >>>agpart modules. Now in the kernel, I specified to not compile agpart >>>module

Re: Loading Kernel Modules

2004-11-17 Thread Paul Tsai
Andreas Janssen wrote: I'm compiling a custom kernel 2.6.6 on my Toshiba laptop. One of the things I've noticed is that it keeps loading the intel_agp and the agpart modules. Now in the kernel, I specified to not compile agpart module. however it loads. To me, that looks like you forgot to m

Re: Loading Kernel Modules

2004-11-17 Thread Andreas Janssen
Hello Paul Tsai (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: > I'm compiling a custom kernel 2.6.6 on my Toshiba laptop. One of the > things I've noticed is that it keeps loading the intel_agp and the > agpart modules. Now in the kernel, I specified to not compile agpart > module. however it loads. To me, tha

Re: Loading Kernel Modules

2004-11-17 Thread Andrea Vettorello
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 13:34:21 -0500, Paul Tsai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey all, > I'm compiling a custom kernel 2.6.6 on my Toshiba laptop. One of the > things I've noticed is that it keeps loading the intel_agp and the > agpart modules. Now in the kernel, I specified to not compile agpart >

Re: Loading kernel modules at startup

2004-08-09 Thread george roman
Otto Wyss wrote: Ooh! modconf! It wasn't installed (how would I know?). After each install of a Debian system I always install "modconf", "vim" and "fbset" since I can't believe any sensible system is usable without them. Especially modconf is a must. Most of the time I add "most" to get rid o

Re: Loading kernel modules at startup

2004-08-09 Thread Otto Wyss
> Ooh! modconf! It wasn't installed (how would I know?). > After each install of a Debian system I always install "modconf", "vim" and "fbset" since I can't believe any sensible system is usable without them. Especially modconf is a must. Most of the time I add "most" to get rid of "more" and "les

Re: Loading kernel modules at startup

2004-08-09 Thread Icebiker
ction? In any event, I'm much further ahead than I was before. Thanks. /icebiker - Original Message - From: "s. keeling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 02:00 Subject: Re: Loading kernel modules at startup > In

Re: Loading kernel modules at startup

2004-08-08 Thread s. keeling
Incoming from John Van Lierde: > > I'm trying to get lm_sensors working. I'm at the point where it works when I > manually load the modules: > > modprobe i2c_sensor > modprobe i2c_piix4 > modprobe w83781d > > and I can read temperatures and voltages and everything. > > But I'm absolutely

Re: Loading kernel modules at startup

2004-08-08 Thread dircha
John Van Lierde wrote: But I'm absolutely baffled as to how to get the modules to load automagically at boot. There are a bunch of utilities (some apparently obsolescent) and files (all of which seem to say that they are generated and not to be edited). I've poked through all the man pages that see

Re: Loading kernel modules

2002-10-03 Thread Shyamal Prasad
"Bill" == Bill Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bill> One of my boxes uses the eepro100 kernel module for its Bill> network interface. As I migrate more from Red Hat based Bill> boxes, the more I like Debian. But one thing that is really Bill> getting me is that this kerne

Re: Loading kernel modules

2002-10-03 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 10:37:01PM -0700, Bill Wagner wrote: > One of my boxes uses the eepro100 kernel module for its network > interface. As I migrate more from Red Hat based boxes, the more I like > Debian. But one thing that is really getting me is that this kernel > module is not getting lo

Re: Loading kernel modules

2002-10-02 Thread Hubert Chan
> "Bill" == Bill Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bill> At least in a RH based distro, I would typically have an entry Bill> like this in my /etc/modules.conf: [...] Read the first few lines of /etc/modules.conf. Debian automatically generates /etc/modules.conf from the files in /etc/mod

Re: Loading kernel modules

2002-10-01 Thread Cameron Hutchison
Once upon a time Bill Wagner said... > But one thing that is really getting me is that this kernel > module is not getting loaded when the machine comes up. > > At least in a RH based distro, I would typically have an entry like this > in my /etc/modules.conf: > > alias eth0 eepro100 > > And th

Re: Loading kernel modules

2002-10-01 Thread nate
Bill Wagner said: > Of course I can always recompile my kernel and build that kernel module > straight in, but I'm just curious what people normally do in this > situation. I am not normal, most people would consider me an extremist when it comes to my kernels to answer your question thou