> >qpsmtpd? It is small, plugin-based, and also written in Perl.
> I couldn't discern, BTW, whether it supports TLS / SSL to an
> upstream MTA? I did find this thread:
>
> http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qpsmtpd/2005/07/msg3404.html
That thread, I think, is about presenting TLS to t
On Sun, 2 May 2010 04:33:46 +0100
Steve Kemp wrote:
> On Sat May 01, 2010 at 22:24:13 -0400, Celejar wrote:
>
> > I couldn't discern, BTW, whether it supports TLS / SSL to an
> > upstream MTA? I did find this thread:
> >
> > http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qpsmtpd/2005/07/msg3404.html
> >
>
On Sat May 01, 2010 at 22:24:13 -0400, Celejar wrote:
> I couldn't discern, BTW, whether it supports TLS / SSL to an
> upstream MTA? I did find this thread:
>
> http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.qpsmtpd/2005/07/msg3404.html
>
> but I have no idea what the current status of this is.
It seems
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:28:22 -0500
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Celejar put forth on 4/30/2010 3:20 PM:
>
> > It is still small, though - under 70 lines of actual Perl code,
> > although it does, of course, require the basic Perl installation and
> > about a half-dozen other modules.
> >
> > If anyon
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 23:10:11 +0100
Steve Kemp wrote:
> On Fri Apr 30, 2010 at 16:20:40 -0400, Celejar wrote:
>
> > > Hm, I had thought that at least some of the small, relaying MTAs
> > > accepted connections on port 25. On closer perusal, it looks like they
> > > don't.
>
> ..
>
> > I was su
On Fri Apr 30, 2010 at 16:20:40 -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > Hm, I had thought that at least some of the small, relaying MTAs
> > accepted connections on port 25. On closer perusal, it looks like they
> > don't.
..
> I was sufficiently intrigued by the (apparent) absence of a simple MTA
> that doe
Celejar put forth on 4/30/2010 3:20 PM:
> It is still small, though - under 70 lines of actual Perl code,
> although it does, of course, require the basic Perl installation and
> about a half-dozen other modules.
>
> If anyone has any feedback, or suggestions for improvement, I'd love
> to hear t
[Replying to my own message.]
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:12:24 -0400
Celejar wrote:
...
> Hm, I had thought that at least some of the small, relaying MTAs
> accepted connections on port 25. On closer perusal, it looks like they
> don't.
>
> One option would be to build your own version of one of
o exp...@hope.cz:
> Does anyone know about a tiny / liteweight SMTP server for Linux( Debian)?
> I need the
> server that can accept several connections at the same time .
dunno if it fits for you, but on my boxes i use masqmail.
--
Florian "eix" Rehnisch +49-1520-9573489
GPG 1CF2467F ICQ 9
[Please reply to the list, and not to me, as per the CoC.]
[Please don't top post.]
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 09:48:06 +0200
exp...@hope.cz wrote:
> Celejar,
> Thank you for your reply.
> Not full MTA
> Best regards,
> lad.
Hm, I had thought that at least some of the small, relaying MTAs
accepted con
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 04:26:16 -0500
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> exp...@hope.cz put forth on 4/24/2010 2:19 AM:
> >
> > Hi Celejar,
> > Thank you for your reply.
> > I use Linux running in Compact Flash so that the size of the Compact flash
> > memory is the limit
> > Users will send emails to a progr
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 12:35:55PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> msmtp will *not* accept incoming mail (which is what the OP asked for).
> The solution is probably one of exim or postfix, possibly recompiled to
> keep only a minimum of features needed for the given application, an
> answer to
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 04:57:10AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> You must have missed this in the OP's post. It's omitted in your reply
> quote as well: "Users will send emails to a program running..."
>
> I take this to mean _remote_ network users. msmtp-mta is an smtp _CLIENT_
> only. It wil
d.sastre.med...@gmail.com put forth on 4/24/2010 3:51 AM:
> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 09:19:56AM +0200, exp...@hope.cz wrote:
>>I use Linux running in Compact Flash so that the size of the Compact
>>flash memory is the limit
>>Only SMTP, no POP3 server
>>Can you suggest something?
>
On Sat,24.Apr.10, 10:51:56, d.sastre.med...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 09:19:56AM +0200, exp...@hope.cz wrote:
> >I use Linux running in Compact Flash so that the size of the Compact
> >flash memory is the limit
> >Only SMTP, no POP3 server
> >Can you suggest someth
exp...@hope.cz put forth on 4/24/2010 2:19 AM:
>
> Hi Celejar,
> Thank you for your reply.
> I use Linux running in Compact Flash so that the size of the Compact flash
> memory is the limit
> Users will send emails to a program running in the Compact flash so I need a
> mail server there too.
>
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 09:19:56AM +0200, exp...@hope.cz wrote:
>I use Linux running in Compact Flash so that the size of the Compact
>flash memory is the limit
>Only SMTP, no POP3 server
>Can you suggest something?
Hello,
This simple search:
$ apt-cache search mta light
showed
Hi Celejar,
Thank you for your reply.
I use Linux running in Compact Flash so that the size of the Compact flash memory is the
limit
Users will send emails to a program running in the Compact flash so I need a mail server
there too.
Only SMTP, no POP3 server
Can
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:15:33 +0200
exp...@hope.cz wrote:
> Does anyone know about a tiny / liteweight SMTP server for Linux( Debian)?
> I need the
> server that can accept several connections at the same time .
> I do not need POP3 server
I'm not sure that I can help, but what, exactly, do yo
19 matches
Mail list logo
