Re: Linux vs Windows

2003-05-29 Thread Adam Majer
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 11:46:14AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi group, > > > MindCraft has been well established as nothing short of a HOAX put on by > Microsoft. IIRC it was a test between two servers, one of which was > configured by the best minds in the business. The other configure

Re: linux vs. windows in the sound arena

2002-04-15 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.04.15.2044 +0200]: > One of those cards was a "Vibra16" by Creative Labs. I rebuilt my > kernel with the sb module enabled and viola, it worked great. Only 16 > bit sound, but who cares? if you ask me, the old 16bit ISA cards, the ones that actually pro

Re: linux vs. windows in the sound arena

2002-04-15 Thread Dave Carrigan
dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Linux wins a clear knockout in this round! It only took 1 reboot too, > for inserting the hardware. Yep, Linux was a clear knockout for me when I replaced my Diamond 550 card with a Matrox G450 card. I took my box down, installed the card, edited my X config fi

Re: Linux vs Windows NT?

2001-06-07 Thread Sebastian Drews
Renai LeMay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Being a linux/bsd admin, he asked me. Now I don't have the time or the > inclination to research it for him :) But I'd like to know if anyone out > there has any links in their bookmarks dir which he would find helpful > (keeping in mind the fact that he

Re: Linux vs Windows NT?

2001-06-07 Thread ANDREW PERRIN
Well that rather depends on what you want to do with it (although in the vast majority of cases the answer is "yes, Linux is a superior alternative to NT"). Narrow the research question... get a better answer :) - Andrew J. Perrin - Assis

Re: Linux vs Windows NT?

2001-06-07 Thread Walther, Christoph
Andrew J. Perrin wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I have a friend who is going through uni, and has been asked to provide a > comparison of Linux vs Windows NT in answer to this question:. According to the quote item, I recomend to read following contribution: http://www.unix-vs-nt.org/kirch/ G

Re: Linux vs Windows NT?

2001-06-07 Thread ray p
There are some good whitepapers on the subject of what is good about Linux and some head to head type stuff at htpp://www.linuxcare.com If this friend is dealing with business or manager types a lot of this stuff is written in their language. On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 09:05:29AM -0400, ANDREW PE

Re: Linux vs Windows NT?

2001-06-07 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 10:52:18AM +, Sebastian Drews ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Renai LeMay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Being a linux/bsd admin, he asked me. Now I don't have the time or the > > inclination to research it for him :) But I'd like to know if anyone out > > there has any

Re: Linux vs. Windows

1998-07-31 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Thu, Jul 30, 1998 at 08:52:52PM -0400, Tom Pfeifer wrote: > > The only problem along these lines with Windows is that it insists on > rewriting the MBR when you install it. This can really throw someone > who's not aware of it, and this practice is dead wrong - no OS should > ever do that wit

Re: Linux vs. Windows

1998-07-31 Thread Tom Pfeifer
George Bonser wrote: > > > One thing that I find common is that newbies do not take the time > to read the instructions. They think they can "figure it out as they > go along" like they are used to doing with Windows. That can be > disaster with Linux because it will not warn you that you are abo

Re: Linux vs. Windows

1998-07-30 Thread Christopher Wesneski
I recently installed Linux on my machine days after I upgraded to Win98. The only problem (not really a problem, just an inconvenience) was having to run defrag and then removing my swap file because I couldn't run defrag without the swap file (windows choked, go figure). [EMAIL PROTECTED] wro

Re: Linux vs. Windows

1998-07-30 Thread Richard Alhama
On Wed, 29 Jul 1998, Tom Pfeifer wrote: > These days, Linux being hard to install is true only in the sense that > almost everyone installing it is starting out with something like Win95 > already on their machine. That immediately causes problems like setting > up a dual boot and partitioning to

Re: Linux vs. Windows

1998-07-30 Thread Brian Weiss
On Wed, 29 Jul 1998, The guy on the couch. wrote: > Hi, I use win95 and I tried Linux once and couldn't even load a > program. I'm not very experienced with other OSes. Since then I've > never tried it. I'm thinking of upgrading to win98 and got to thinking > about Linux again. Is there a way

Re: Linux vs. Windows

1998-07-30 Thread Tom Pfeifer
These days, Linux being hard to install is true only in the sense that almost everyone installing it is starting out with something like Win95 already on their machine. That immediately causes problems like setting up a dual boot and partitioning to crop up - and these are problems that are not uni

Re: Linux vs. Windows

1998-07-29 Thread count zero
The guy on the couch. wrote: > Hi, I use win95 and I tried Linux once and couldn't even load a > program. I'm not very experienced with other OSes. Since then I've > never tried it. I'm thinking of upgrading to win98 and got to thinking > about Linux again. Is there a way for both of these O

Re: Linux vs. Windows

1998-07-29 Thread Robert Rati
I'd be careful with 98 and Linux. I read about 98 moving data around and could possibly break Linux. I just installed Debian 2.0, and it's pretty easy now. Basically follow the prompts. YOu may not have everything working, but your system will boot. On Wed, 29 Jul 1998, The guy on the couch.

RE: Linux vs. Windows

1998-07-29 Thread keatingjp17
I use win98 and Linux on same machine and it works fine. Only problem i have gotten is that I lost 2 GB somewhere in between fdisk for linux and fdisk for win98(having 16GB hd is nice). But I don't really care to do a reinstall to fix it. I have found that the install for Debian is maybe (at mos