r Rosenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2000 12:41 PM
> Subject: Re: Linux only sees half my RAM
>
>
> > I don't know how, I once saw it happen. With a 2.0 all the ram was
> > recognised and the system was stable, with a 2.2 only half w
Lucky you are - i have 64Mb not 192 both in 2.0 and 2.2 versions.
- Original Message -
From: Ron Rademaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Viktor Rosenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2000 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: Linux only sees half my RAM
> I don't kno
I don't know how, I once saw it happen. With a 2.0 all the ram was
recognised and the system was stable, with a 2.2 only half was recognised
and the system became instable if the ram was set on 128 with lilo (with a
2.3 all the recognised and stable, as far as you can call a 2.3 stable).
Ron
On M
Ron Rademaker wrote:
> PS. Editing your lilo.conf could also make your system instable in these
> kind of situations.
Huu? How so?
MfG Viktor
--
Viktor Rosenfeld
E-Mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
HertzSCHLAG:http://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~rosenfel/hs/
Viktor Rosenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ron Rademaker wrote:
>
> > PS. Editing your lilo.conf could also make your system instable in these
> > kind of situations.
>
> Huu? How so?
I assume by getting something wrong in there, or by some quirk of your
hardware. For example, I have a lapt
> Maybe if you would the question u would see that I dont use lilo.
if you would look closer at my answer, then you would discover some irony
in it ...
> I tried adding it to loadlin and that didn't work.
hmm - that's bad. if even that does not work, then ... ** sorry ...
greetings
> > > ok,
sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Maybe if you would the question u would see that I dont use lilo. I tried
> adding it to loadlin and that didn't work.
> ~Sam
>
> On Sun, 9 Apr 2000, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
>
> > > ok, First let me say that I do NOT use lilo so don't tell me edit
> > > lilo
Maybe if you would the question u would see that I dont use lilo. I tried
adding it to loadlin and that didn't work.
~Sam
On Sun, 9 Apr 2000, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > ok, First let me say that I do NOT use lilo so don't tell me edit
> > lilo.conf. I boot with loadlin, have 128mb of RAM but
> ok, First let me say that I do NOT use lilo so don't tell me edit
> lilo.conf. I boot with loadlin, have 128mb of RAM but Linux sees only 64mb
> of it. When I type "free" it says:
>
let's start a competition: the most asked FAQ :-)=)
RTFM! *g*
... or just add mem=128M to your lilo.conf
What does it say when you're using a 2.3 or a 2.0 kernel?
Ron
PS. Editing your lilo.conf could also make your system instable in these
kind of situations.
On Sun, 9 Apr 2000, sam wrote:
> ok, First let me say that I do NOT use lilo so don't tell me edit
> lilo.conf. I boot with loadlin, have 12
10 matches
Mail list logo
