Re: Linux Standard Base

2003-11-06 Thread Bob Proulx
Paul E Condon wrote: > I've been talking to other Linux users in my area (Colorado, USA) > about their problems with Red Hat dropping their user, non-enterprise, > distribution. I suggest Debian. I say its really great. But I'm told > "But it doesn't comply with 'Linux Standard Base' ". True today

Re: Linux Standard Base

2003-11-06 Thread Ron Johnson
On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 00:33, Paul E Condon wrote: > I've been talking to other Linux users in my area (Colorado, USA) > about their problems with Red Hat dropping their user, non-enterprise, > distribution. I suggest Debian. I say its really great. But I'm told > "But it doesn't comply with 'Linux

Re: Linux Standard Base

2003-11-06 Thread Chris Ochs
Go look at www.linuxbase.org to see what it is all about. But seriously, if someone would throw out the possibility of using a distro just because it wasn't trying to conform to the LSB, I would *seriously* question their competence in running enterprise level systems. That would be like saying I

Re: Linux Standard Base

2003-11-05 Thread Greg Madden
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 05 November 2003 09:33 pm, Paul E Condon wrote: > I've been talking to other Linux users in my area (Colorado, USA) > about their problems with Red Hat dropping their user, > non-enterprise, distribution. I suggest Debian. I say its really