>> What kind of AP would consume 20W? Mine consumes around 5W and that includes
>> a 2TB disk attached to it (and spinning).
> An Asus RT-N56U needs 30W max. A Linksys EA6900 needs 42W.
I'm not concerned about max consumption. I'm talking about 24/7
consumption (i.e. the impact on the monthly kW
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:51:03AM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > a maximum consumption of about 3W, and has no configuration at
> [...]
> > A typical AP needs 10-20W,
>
> What kind of AP would consume 20W? Mine consumes around 5W and that includes
> a 2TB disk attached to it (and spinning).
A
> a maximum consumption of about 3W, and has no configuration at
[...]
> A typical AP needs 10-20W,
What kind of AP would consume 20W? Mine consumes around 5W and that includes
a 2TB disk attached to it (and spinning).
> and has an expected lifetime of 1-4 years.
Where do you get those numbers?
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 03:14:27PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > Nope. Buy a $20 5-8 port ethernet switch. Very reliable. That's
> > in the diagram above as "switch".
>
> But it also means one more box. If you had one box before, that doubles
> the number of boxes, and might also double the 24
> Nope. Buy a $20 5-8 port ethernet switch. Very reliable. That's
> in the diagram above as "switch".
But it also means one more box. If you had one box before, that doubles
the number of boxes, and might also double the 24/7 power consumption.
Stefan
On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 03:32:00AM +, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 9:57 AM Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 04:56:06AM +, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 2:48 AM Dan Ritter wrote:
> >
> > Got it. You can change that by removing NAT from t
On 2016-08-08 8:30, pasc...@sdf.org wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Aug 2016, Curt wrote:
>>
>> I haven't been following the thread (discussion beyond my technical
>> reach) but couldn't the little man boot up a live cd or usb drive and
>> surf his little heart out? Someone talked about targeting the MAC
>> ad
On Mon, 8 Aug 2016, Curt wrote:
On 2016-08-07, p...@gatech.edu wrote:
On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 at 20:00, Lisi Reisz wrote:
Perhaps he wants to stop his children/grandchildren/house guests surfing
the
web at 3:00 am.
Spot on, Lisi!
Hello,
If the computer is not supposed to be connected a
On 2016-08-07, p...@gatech.edu wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 at 20:00, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
>>> Perhaps he wants to stop his children/grandchildren/house guests surfing
> the
>>> web at 3:00 am.
>
>> Spot on, Lisi!
>
> Hello,
> If the computer is not supposed to be connected at all, then maybe:
>
On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 at 03:15, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 07 Aug 2016 at 03:32:00 +, Mark Fletcher wrote:
>
> > In the end I got what I needed by using Lars' pointer of the iptables
> > extensions. I copied the iptables systemd service unit from my LFS box to
> > the machine in question, and then cr
Le 5 août 2016 16:23, "Mark Fletcher" a écrit :
> On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 at 20:00, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>> Perhaps he wants to stop his children/grandchildren/house guests surfing
the
>> web at 3:00 am.
> Spot on, Lisi!
Hello,
If the computer is not supposed to be connected at all, then maybe:
sudo
On Sun 07 Aug 2016 at 03:32:00 +, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> In the end I got what I needed by using Lars' pointer of the iptables
> extensions. I copied the iptables systemd service unit from my LFS box to
> the machine in question, and then created a script in /etc/systemd/scripts
> that first s
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 9:57 AM Dan Ritter wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 04:56:06AM +, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 2:48 AM Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> Got it. You can change that by removing NAT from the AP. For
> instance, plug your switch into a LAN port instead of the WAN
On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 04:56:06AM +, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 2:48 AM Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 03:49:28PM +, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 11:04 PM Brian wrote:
> > >
> > > I didn't mention earlier, and I'm not sure if it i
On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 3:43 AM Brian wrote:
> On Fri 05 Aug 2016 at 15:49:28 +, Mark Fletcher wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 11:04 PM Brian wrote:
> >
> > > Sticking with the idea of using a systemd service file, the script it
> > > runs would check the time and alter the routing table
On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 2:48 AM Dan Ritter wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 03:49:28PM +, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 11:04 PM Brian wrote:
> >
> > I didn't mention earlier, and I'm not sure if it is relevant, but the
> > computer connects via WiFi to my access point, whic
On Fri 05 Aug 2016 at 20:02:58 +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Fri 05 Aug 2016 at 13:48:54 -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> > I have a new suggestion, based on this.
> >
> > Do all the filtering on your LFS box.
> >
> > Match your kid's machine by MAC address.
> >
> > Write two tiny scripts:
> >
> > #!/
On Fri 05 Aug 2016 at 13:48:54 -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 03:49:28PM +, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 11:04 PM Brian wrote:
> >
> > I didn't mention earlier, and I'm not sure if it is relevant, but the
> > computer connects via WiFi to my access poin
On Fri 05 Aug 2016 at 15:49:28 +, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 11:04 PM Brian wrote:
>
> > Sticking with the idea of using a systemd service file, the script it
> > runs would check the time and alter the routing table when necessary.
> > Neither cron nor iptables need come
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 03:49:28PM +, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 11:04 PM Brian wrote:
>
> I didn't mention earlier, and I'm not sure if it is relevant, but the
> computer connects via WiFi to my access point, which is also my network's
> internet gateway -- with an LFS box
On Fri 05 Aug 2016 at 15:03:47 (+0100), Brian wrote:
> On Fri 05 Aug 2016 at 12:00:28 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> > On Friday 05 August 2016 11:40:28 Brian wrote:
> > >
> > > How essential is this? cron could
> > >
> > > ip route add default via
> > >
> > > at specific times between 9pm and 9a
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 11:04 PM Brian wrote:
> On Fri 05 Aug 2016 at 12:00:28 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> > On Friday 05 August 2016 11:40:28 Brian wrote:
>
> Let us look at this from a different angle. If the machine is given a
> fixed address it negates the need for dhcp checking, If, addition
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 4:26 PM Lars Noodén wrote:
>
> iptables has some match extensions that will work with UTC time,
> specifically the extensions --timestart and --timestop Using those you
> should be able to make rules that operate all the time but block traffic
> during the specified hours.
On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 at 20:00, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Friday 05 August 2016 11:40:28 Brian wrote:
> > On Fri 05 Aug 2016 at 00:02:40 +, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> > > On a stretch box I have, I want to allow access to the Internet between
> > > the hours of 9am and 9pm and block it between 9pm and
On Fri 05 Aug 2016 at 12:00:28 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Friday 05 August 2016 11:40:28 Brian wrote:
> >
> > How essential is this? cron could
> >
> > ip route add default via
> >
> > at specific times between 9pm and 9am and then remove the default route.
> > If the machine isn't up all th
On Friday 05 August 2016 11:40:28 Brian wrote:
> On Fri 05 Aug 2016 at 00:02:40 +, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> > On a stretch box I have, I want to allow access to the Internet between
> > the hours of 9am and 9pm and block it between 9pm and 9am. Ideally allow
> > local network access throughout bu
On Fri 05 Aug 2016 at 00:02:40 +, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> On a stretch box I have, I want to allow access to the Internet between the
> hours of 9am and 9pm and block it between 9pm and 9am. Ideally allow local
> network access throughout but block Internet access between 9pm and 9am,
> but I c
On 08/05/2016 03:02 AM, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> On a stretch box I have, I want to allow access to the Internet between the
> hours of 9am and 9pm and block it between 9pm and 9am. Ideally allow local
> network access throughout but block Internet access between 9pm and 9am,
> but I can accept total
28 matches
Mail list logo
