On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 10:04:46 -0500
"S.D.A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yeah really?! You can read/write an e-mail while Sylpheed is pulling
> down mesages? Cool -- not being able to b4 is the primary reason I
> left it, for Mozilla.
>
> I liked it's ability to reply with higlighted materia
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 09:30:12AM +1000 or thereabouts, Peter A. Cole wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 12:57:01 -0500
> "S.D.A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > No it doesn't thread the processes. In other words one can't do anything
> > while one is downloading e-mail. The application is locke
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 12:57:01 -0500
"S.D.A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No it doesn't thread the processes. In other words one can't do anything
> while one is downloading e-mail. The application is locked, until that
> I/O finishes.
Ahh ok, in that case this situation has been resolved. I ca
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 12:31:17PM +1000 or thereabouts, Peter A. Cole wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 21:24:29 -0500
> "S.D.A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It's been some time since I last used Sylpheed, but one can set specific
> > reply-to behaviours for each mail directory. For a GUI client
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 21:24:29 -0500
"S.D.A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's been some time since I last used Sylpheed, but one can set specific
> reply-to behaviours for each mail directory. For a GUI client Sylpheed
> isn't too bad -- Too bad it isn't a threaded client though. I disliked
> the
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 12:07:25PM +1000 or thereabouts, Peter A. Cole wrote:
>
> I noticed on the site they're talking about another 12 months to get it
> where I need it to be. If I had lots of $$$ I'd make a donation to help!
>
> Also, I noticed by default in Sylpheed when you hit reply, it ma
- Original Message -
From: "David P James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 3:34 AM
Subject: Re: Lightweight Alternative to Mozilla-Firebird
>
> There's Skipstone, but for some reason it does not appear
- Original Message -
From: "Tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Peter A. Cole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 11:59 AM
Subject: Re: Lightweight Alternative to Mozilla-Firebird
> * [28/02/2004 02:47] Peter A. Cole <[EMAIL PROTEC
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 12:26 AM
Subject: Re: Lightweight Alternative to Mozilla-Firebird
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:58:50 +0100, Jan Schulz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
- Original Message -
From: "Jan Schulz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 10:58 PM
Subject: Re: Lightweight Alternative to Mozilla-Firebird
> * Peter A. Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just wondering i
On February 27, 2004 07:17, Peter A. Cole wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just wondering if anyone can suggest a lighter weight alternative to
> Mozilla Firebird?
>
> So far, I think Galeon may be similar to Firebird, but I think it
> will want Gnome installed, which I definitely don't want to run.
>
There'
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:58:50 +0100, Jan Schulz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Peter A. Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just wondering if anyone can suggest a lighter weight alternative to
Mozilla
Firebird?
I'm running Sarge on an old P200MMX with 160MB RAM, but Firebird still
chews
up a little to
* Peter A. Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just wondering if anyone can suggest a lighter weight alternative to Mozilla
> Firebird?
> I'm running Sarge on an old P200MMX with 160MB RAM, but Firebird still chews
> up a little too much memory.
Opera.
empty:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR
- Original Message -
From: "Tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Peter A. Cole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 10:44 PM
Subject: Re: Lightweight Alternative to Mozilla-Firebird
>
> Just check it out then. I'm quite sure dillo know
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Huggins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: Lightweight Alternative to Mozilla-Firebird
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 10:17:21PM +1000, Peter A. Cole wrote:
> &g
* [27/02/2004 13:20] Peter A. Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Just wondering if anyone can suggest a lighter weight alternative to Mozilla
> Firebird?
If you can live with less features and GTK 1: dillo. :-)
Otherwise: Opera? (non-free, though)
Greets,
Tom
--
"Mongolian drivers do not care much ab
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 10:17:21PM +1000, Peter A. Cole wrote:
> Just wondering if anyone can suggest a lighter weight alternative to
> Mozilla Firebird?
dillo is very lightweight but not very featureful. I guess it depends
where your cutoff lies.
--
Simon Huggins \ Cows turn themselves inside
17 matches
Mail list logo
