Mihamina Rakotomandimby writes:
> On 07/01/2015 09:21 AM, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>> Hi ... As web browser, Midori was claimed to be light, but I see almost no
>> difference with Firefox. Please any advice for a *really* light one,
>> suitable for that old machine?
>
> Most browsers rely on the re
Rodolfo Medina writes:
> Hi all the listers.
>
> I have an old Hyundai Notebook too slow for Gnome, in fact I installed
> openbox as Window Manager in it and am happy with it and think I'll be using
> it for good, so simple fast and essential as it is. As web browser, Midori
> was claimed to be
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 03:07:43PM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> On 02/07/2015, Wilko Fokken wrote:
> > In the past times, depending on a serial modem for internet access,
> > I preferred Opera, because it allows to switch ANY graphics OFF // ON
> > through simple menu buttons:
> >
>
> A problem wit
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 03:52:36PM +0300, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
> On 07/02/2015 02:25 PM, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> >Displaying images or not has very few things related to the browser heavyness
> >and celerity/velocity. What the OP asked for is a lightweitght browser
> >(memory footprint)
2015-07-02 18:44 GMT+02:00 Rodolfo Medina :
> writes:
>
> > On Thu, 2 Jul 2015 09:18:48 + (UTC)
> > Glyn Astill wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> > From: Andrew M.A. Cater
> >> >To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> >> >Sent: Wednesda
writes:
> On Thu, 2 Jul 2015 09:18:48 + (UTC)
> Glyn Astill wrote:
>
>>
>> > From: Andrew M.A. Cater
>> >To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>> >Sent: Wednesday, 1 July 2015, 19:15
>> >Subject: Re: Light web browser for old PC
>
On Thu, 2 Jul 2015 09:18:48 + (UTC)
Glyn Astill wrote:
>
> > From: Andrew M.A. Cater
> >To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> >Sent: Wednesday, 1 July 2015, 19:15
> >Subject: Re: Light web browser for old PC
> >
> >
> >On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 09
On 2015-07-01, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Hi all the listers.
>
> I have an old Hyundai Notebook too slow for Gnome, in fact I installed openbox
> as Window Manager in it and am happy with it and think I'll be using it for
> good, so simple fast and essential as it is. As web browser, Midori was
>
On 07/02/2015 02:25 PM, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
Displaying images or not has very few things related to the browser heavyness
and celerity/velocity. What the OP asked for is a lightweitght browser
(memory footprint) and potentially velocity in rendering pages (CPU cycle
usage).
I thought downloadi
Mihamina Rakotomandimby writes:
> On 07/02/2015 03:52 AM, Wilko Fokken wrote:
>> In the past times, depending on a serial modem for internet access,
>> I preferred Opera, because it allows to switch ANY graphics OFF // ON
>> through simple menu buttons:
>>
>> [View]--> [Images]--> { [Show images]
> From: Andrew M.A. Cater
>To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>Sent: Wednesday, 1 July 2015, 19:15
>Subject: Re: Light web browser for old PC
>
>
>On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 09:52:03AM +0300, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
>> On 07/01/2015 09:21 AM, Rodolfo Medina wrote
On 02/07/2015, Wilko Fokken wrote:
> In the past times, depending on a serial modem for internet access,
> I preferred Opera, because it allows to switch ANY graphics OFF // ON
> through simple menu buttons:
>
A problem with the opera web browser, that causes me to avoid using
recent versions, an
On 07/02/2015 03:52 AM, Wilko Fokken wrote:
In the past times, depending on a serial modem for internet access,
I preferred Opera, because it allows to switch ANY graphics OFF // ON
through simple menu buttons:
[View]--> [Images]--> { [Show images] || [Cached Images] || [No Images] }
(Any of th
On 01/07/15 16:21, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Hi all the listers.
>
> I have an old Hyundai Notebook too slow for Gnome, in fact I installed openbox
> as Window Manager in it and am happy with it and think I'll be using it for
> good, so simple fast and essential as it is. As web browser, Midori was
In the past times, depending on a serial modem for internet access,
I preferred Opera, because it allows to switch ANY graphics OFF // ON
through simple menu buttons:
[View]--> [Images]--> { [Show images] || [Cached Images] || [No Images] }
(Any of the three options can be made the default, to be
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 09:52:03AM +0300, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
> On 07/01/2015 09:21 AM, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> >Hi ... As web browser, Midori was
> >claimed to be light, but I see almost no difference with Firefox. Please any
> >advice for a *really* light one, suitable for that old ma
On Wed, 01 Jul 2015 07:21:56 +0100
Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Hi all the listers.
>
> I have an old Hyundai Notebook too slow for Gnome, in fact I
> installed openbox as Window Manager in it and am happy with it and
> think I'll be using it for good, so simple fast and essential as it
> is. As web
On 07/01/2015 09:21 AM, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
Hi ... As web browser, Midori was
claimed to be light, but I see almost no difference with Firefox. Please any
advice for a *really* light one, suitable for that old machine?
Most browsers rely on the redering engine.
On that field you mostly have
On Wed, 01 Jul 2015 07:21:56 +0100
Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Hi all the listers.
>
> I have an old Hyundai Notebook too slow for Gnome, in fact I
> installed openbox as Window Manager in it and am happy with it and
> think I'll be using it for good, so simple fast and essential as it
> is. As web
19 matches
Mail list logo
