On 6 Mar 03 22:35:56 GMT, Keith Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the way, is there some reason Debian can't adopt the Libranet
> installer and tweak it for the Debain defaults intead of the Libranet
> defaults? The installer is very nice.
Debian supports 11(?) architectures. How many do
> Hi,
>
Hi,
> ...my question is if I do an apt-get
> upgrade, will I officially be converted to sarge, or is there
> more to it
> than that?
I believe you might have to apt-get dist-upgrade when doing a change so
fundamental.
---
>
> While I like a lot about Libranet, my plan was to use it as a short
> cut installer for Debian. I hope that doesn't violate the spirit of
> the free (older) Libranet version. The price of Libranet seems a
> little high to me, considering that they rely on Debian to provide
> security fixes,
Colin Watson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 04:24:46PM +0800, Robert Storey wrote:
Libranet is a commercial distro (and a very good one too - it's what I
use). Anyway, the installer and configuration utilities are the property
of the owners, so Debian can't simply adopt it without permission. The
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 04:24:46PM +0800, Robert Storey wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 17:35:56 -0500
> Keith Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > By the way, is there some reason Debian can't adopt the Libranet
> > installer and tweak it for the Debain defaults intead of the Libranet
> > default
On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 17:35:56 -0500
Keith Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the way, is there some reason Debian can't adopt the Libranet
> installer and tweak it for the Debain defaults intead of the Libranet
> defaults? The installer is very nice.
Libranet is a commercial distro (and a
6 matches
Mail list logo
