On Wed, 19 Jun 2002 10:00:21 -0700
"Steve Juranich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Travis and Dale. The umask argument did the trick. I changed it to
> 000 instead of 007, because I didn't want to have to fiddle around with group
> ownerships as well.
>
> Now to get wine working. I'd like
Thanks Travis and Dale. The umask argument did the trick. I changed it to
000 instead of 007, because I didn't want to have to fiddle around with group
ownerships as well.
Now to get wine working. I'd like to play Magic: The Gathering online without
having to boot windoze. ;)
> Wouldn't umask=007 be better? Otherwise the gid part is redundant since
> the group really doesn't matter if other has the same permissions as
> group...
I don't remember how I came up with this line, it was several months
ago, looking at it now what you say makes sense. I think I tried
umas
Dale Hair wrote:
I use this line but there may be a better way.
/dev/sda1/win2k ntfsdefaults,users,ro,umask=0,gid=6 0 0
Wouldn't umask=007 be better? Otherwise the gid part is redundant since
the group really doesn't matter if other has the same permissions as
group...
--
I use this line but there may be a better way.
/dev/sda1/win2k ntfsdefaults,users,ro,umask=0,gid=6 0 0
On Tue, 2002-06-18 at 16:39, Steve Juranich wrote:
> I have the following /etc/fstab:
>
> # /etc/fstab: static file system information.
> #
> #
5 matches
Mail list logo
