On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 14:47:03 -0400, francis picabia wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>>> disturbances?
>>> Have you upgraded a Debian from old->new stable before?
>>
>> (...)
>>
>> Nope, never ever. In Spanish I would say "jamás de los jamases" :-)
>>
>> In do run
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 19:33:42 -0500, Tony Baldwin wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 04:36:49PM +0100, Camaleón wrote:
>
> (...)
>
>>> > Why can't you use squeeze?
>>> > --
>>> > Sent from my Android phone with GMX Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 19:33:42 -0500, Tony Baldwin wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 04:36:49PM +0100, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> > Why can't you use squeeze?
>> > --
>> > Sent from my Android phone with GMX Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>>
>> Indeed, I do can, but I prefer to accomodate the span-
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 13:46:38 -0800, Steven Rosenberg wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:10:19 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
(...)
>>> You probably missed
>>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-announce/2009/msg00010.html
>>>
>>> ,
>>> | In the ligh
On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 19:45:25 -0500
Tony Baldwin wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 01:46:38PM -0800, Steven Rosenberg wrote:
> >
> > The official upgrade process for Lenny to Squeeze was not as easy
> > as a simple dist-upgrade, and I wonder if Lenny-to-Wheezy would be
> > too
>
> It really amazes
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 01:46:38PM -0800, Steven Rosenberg wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> > On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:10:19 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> >
> >> On Vi, 06 ian 12, 12:11:36, Camaleón wrote:
> >
> > Yup, I did read it, but it does not say a word about the po
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 04:36:49PM +0100, Camaleón wrote:
> El 2012-01-04 a las 13:42 -0500, Tony Baldwin escribió:
>
> (resending to the list)
>
> > "Camaleón" wrote:
> >
> > >On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 10:54:29 -0400, francis picabia wrote:
> > >
> > >> There was discussion here a few months ago abo
Canaima (debian derivative) made an update assistant [1] for the upgrade
from it's lenny-based version (2.1) to it's squeeze-based (3.0), and
everything worked out ok for users: they didn't have to reinstall.
You can take a look at it's main script [2] (bash, comments in spanish).
¿Is this suitab
On Friday 06 January 2012 21:46:38 Steven Rosenberg wrote:
> Truth be told, I'd just do a reinstall of Wheezy when the time comes.
That's generally a good idea anyway! (IMHO, of ciourse.)
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 6:31 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:10:19 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>
>> On Vi, 06 ian 12, 12:11:36, Camaleón wrote:
>>>
>>> Sure (this was also discussed in this same list, time ago...). The
>>> possibility of jumping from Lenny to Wheezy was oficially ment
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:10:19 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Vi, 06 ian 12, 12:11:36, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>> Sure (this was also discussed in this same list, time ago...). The
>> possibility of jumping from Lenny to Wheezy was oficially mentioned
>> here:
>>
>> Debian decides to adopt time-base
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 05:33:08 +, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:36:49 +0100, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> El 2012-01-04 a las 13:42 -0500, Tony Baldwin escribió:
(...)
>>> Why can't you use squeeze?
>>> --
>>> Sent from my Android phone with GMX Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>>
>> I
On Vi, 06 ian 12, 12:11:36, Camaleón wrote:
>
> Sure (this was also discussed in this same list, time ago...). The
> possibility of jumping from Lenny to Wheezy was oficially mentioned here:
>
> Debian decides to adopt time-based release freezes
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-announce/2009/msg
On 06/01/12 23:11, � wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 12:36:07 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>
>> On Mi, 04 ian 12, 17:37:42, Camaleón wrote:
No new Lenny updates after 6 February 2012.
>>>
> it came out the possibility of having release freeze periods and the
> above mentioned announceme
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 12:36:07 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mi, 04 ian 12, 17:37:42, Camaleón wrote:
>> >
>> > No new Lenny updates after 6 February 2012.
>>
>> Yes, unfortunately Debian team changed their mind at the middle of the
>> proccess. This unforeseen change forces me to keep my lenn
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 5:36 AM, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mi, 04 ian 12, 17:37:42, Camaleón wrote:
>> >
>> > No new Lenny updates after 6 February 2012.
>>
>> Yes, unfortunately Debian team changed their mind at the middle of the
>> proccess. This unforeseen change forces me to keep my lenny syst
On Mi, 04 ian 12, 17:37:42, Camaleón wrote:
> >
> > No new Lenny updates after 6 February 2012.
>
> Yes, unfortunately Debian team changed their mind at the middle of the
> proccess. This unforeseen change forces me to keep my lenny systems until
> wheezy is released which means having unpatche
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:36:49 +0100, Camaleón wrote:
> El 2012-01-04 a las 13:42 -0500, Tony Baldwin escribió:
>
> (resending to the list)
>
>> "Camaleón" wrote:
>>
>> >On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 10:54:29 -0400, francis picabia wrote:
>> >
>> >> There was discussion here a few months ago about there b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> And then there is Trinity (www.trinitydesktop.org) continuing KDE 3
> development. I am using it very successfully on Squeeze - John
Yes indeed, when the Trinity mirrors are working again and the most
irritating of the
El 2012-01-04 a las 13:42 -0500, Tony Baldwin escribió:
(resending to the list)
> "Camaleón" wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 10:54:29 -0400, francis picabia wrote:
> >
> >> There was discussion here a few months ago about there being no official
> >> date for end of life on Lenny. This has cha
On 05/01/12 02:43, tony baldwin wrote:
>> - Original Message -
>> From: Lisi
>> Sent: 01/04/12 10:34 AM
>> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>> Subject: Re: Lenny (Debian 5.0) approaching end of life
>>
>> On Wednesday 04 January 2012 15:26:01 Tony
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 10:54:29 -0400, francis picabia wrote:
> There was discussion here a few months ago about there being no official
> date for end of life on Lenny. This has changed. I just noticed this
> item on the security announcement mailing list:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-secur
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 15:34 +, Lisi wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 January 2012 15:26:01 Tony Baldwin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 10:54:29AM -0400, francis picabia wrote:
> > > There was discussion here a few months ago about there being no official
> > > date for end of life on Lenny. This h
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 15:43:12 tony baldwin wrote:
> Now I really prefer light, efficient, simple.
Horses for courses!
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lis
> - Original Message -
> From: Lisi
> Sent: 01/04/12 10:34 AM
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Lenny (Debian 5.0) approaching end of life
>
> On Wednesday 04 January 2012 15:26:01 Tony Baldwin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 10:54:29AM -
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 15:26:01 Tony Baldwin wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 10:54:29AM -0400, francis picabia wrote:
> > There was discussion here a few months ago about there being no official
> > date for end of life on Lenny. This has changed. I just noticed this
> > item on the securi
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 10:54:29AM -0400, francis picabia wrote:
> There was discussion here a few months ago about there being no official date
> for end of life on Lenny. This has changed. I just noticed this item
> on the security announcement mailing list:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-
27 matches
Mail list logo
