Sorry, I must have done something wrong when replying, as I'm not
subscribed to the mailing list.
It was supposed to be a reply to this thread:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2018/12/msg00019.html
Message-id: 90642680-7f8e-e3d8-36d9-58385af1f...@videotron.ca
The bug report you mentioned was
On Sat, 29 Dec 2018, Martin wrote:
> Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2018 05:55:23
> From: Martin
> Reply-To: 0e90d598-8836-e221-3ec3-1a35d4963...@gmail.com
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Latest kernel gives blank screen when it boots
> Resent-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2018 1
Le 29/12/2018 à 11:55, Martin a écrit :
I faced the same problem for 3 days until I found your thread here.
Which thread ? There is no Message-ID reference in your post headers.
Tried to setup an old laptop with Intel graphics with Debian testing
9.6. The laptop was running Lubuntu for years
I faced the same problem for 3 days until I found your thread here. Tried to
setup an old laptop with Intel graphics with Debian testing 9.6. The laptop was
running Lubuntu for years happily. inxi reports it only as "Intel Core
Processors Integrated Graphics".
I could only avoid the black scr
Frank McCormick composed on 2018-12-01 14:12 (UTC-0500):
...
> Graphics: Device-1: Intel Core Processor Integrated Graphics vendor:
> Lenovo driver: i915 v: kernel bus ID: 00:02.0
> chip ID: 8086:0042
> Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.3 driver: intel resolution:
> 1920x10
On 12/1/18 7:05 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
Frank McCormick composed on 2018-12-01 18:10 (UTC-0500):
Felix Miata wrote:
Frank McCormick composed on 2018-12-01 17:19 (UTC-0500):
Felix Miata wrote:
Frank McCormick composed on 2018-12-01 14:12 (UTC-0500):
...
Try purging xserver-xorg-vid
Frank McCormick composed on 2018-12-01 18:10 (UTC-0500):
> Felix Miata wrote:
>> Frank McCormick composed on 2018-12-01 17:19 (UTC-0500):
>>> Felix Miata wrote:
Frank McCormick composed on 2018-12-01 14:12 (UTC-0500):
...
Try purging xserver-xorg-video-intel and restarting the s
On 12/1/18 5:53 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
Frank McCormick composed on 2018-12-01 17:19 (UTC-0500):
Felix Miata wrote:
Frank McCormick composed on 2018-12-01 14:12 (UTC-0500):
...
Try purging xserver-xorg-video-intel and restarting the server. Last official
release of that
driver was over
Frank McCormick composed on 2018-12-01 17:19 (UTC-0500):
> Felix Miata wrote:
>> Frank McCormick composed on 2018-12-01 14:12 (UTC-0500):
>> ...
>>> Can anyone help? Where should I look first.
>> Try purging xserver-xorg-video-intel and restarting the server. Last
>> official release of that
>>
On 12/1/18 3:18 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2018-12-01 14:12 -0500, Frank McCormick wrote:
I have spent the last several days setting up Fedora on
another partition. When it came to boot back into Debian Sid
this morning I discovered my screen goes blank after the first
few seconds.
Quite l
On 12/1/18 2:39 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
Frank McCormick composed on 2018-12-01 14:12 (UTC-0500):
...
Can anyone help? Where should I look first.
Try purging xserver-xorg-video-intel and restarting the server. Last official
release of that
driver was over 4 years ago.
https://www.phoronix.c
On 2018-12-01 14:12 -0500, Frank McCormick wrote:
> I have spent the last several days setting up Fedora on
> another partition. When it came to boot back into Debian Sid
> this morning I discovered my screen goes blank after the first
> few seconds.
Quite likely that's bug #914495[1]. #914980 a
Frank McCormick composed on 2018-12-01 14:12 (UTC-0500):
...
> Can anyone help? Where should I look first.
Try purging xserver-xorg-video-intel and restarting the server. Last official
release of that
driver was over 4 years ago.
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Ubuntu-Debian-
Paul Zimmerman composed on 2018-01-09 23:43 (UTC):
> After running "aptitude update" and "aptitude safe-upgrade" on my Wheezy
> boxes, I find I have TWO kernels installed. One of them, the new patch for
> this "Meltdown" problem, does not boot. It hangs. Fortunately, they were
> smart enough to ke
Hi,
On Tue, 9 Jan 2018 23:43:23 + (UTC)
Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> After running "aptitude update" and "aptitude safe-upgrade" on my
> Wheezy boxes, I find I have TWO kernels installed. One of them, the new
> patch for this "Meltdown" problem, does not boot. It hangs.
> Fortunately, they were s
On Jo, 26 ian 12, 11:04:07, Richard wrote:
> Hi
>
> What is the latest kernel release in unstable ?
> I'm seeing 3.1.0.1, yet there are mentions of 3.2 in earlier postings.
$ apt-cache policy linux-image-3.2.0-1-amd64
linux-image-3.2.0-1-amd64:
Installed: 3.2.1-2
Candidate: 3.2.1-2
Version
* Richard [120126 11:04 +]:
> Hi
>
> What is the latest kernel release in unstable ?
> I'm seeing 3.1.0.1, yet there are mentions of 3.2 in earlier postings.
$ apt-cache search linux-image
Elimar
--
Excellent day for drinking heavily.
Spike the office water cooler;-)
--
To UNSUBSCR
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 6:04 AM, Richard wrote:
>
> What is the latest kernel release in unstable ?
> I'm seeing 3.1.0.1, yet there are mentions of 3.2 in earlier postings.
3.2's still in unstable. Just run:
# aptitude update
...
#
# aptitude search linux-image -F '%p %t %v %V'
linux-image
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:47:53 -0500
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> but what config are you going to use if you do that?
>
> Hugo
There is a 2.6.35.x kernel in experimental, you can grab the .config
from there, just do make oldconfig to update it for anything that isnt
in the base config.
--
Regar
desktop wrote:
On 2010-10-06 21:59, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
Manao ahoana, Hello, Bonjour,
I would like to run a heavy KVM + LXC on Debian *Lenny*.
Therefore, I am looking for the latest kernel for that.
I know I could use backports kernel [1], but would you know another
repository?
[
On 2010-10-06 21:59, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
> Manao ahoana, Hello, Bonjour,
>
> I would like to run a heavy KVM + LXC on Debian *Lenny*.
> Therefore, I am looking for the latest kernel for that.
>
> I know I could use backports kernel [1], but would you know another
> repository?
>
> [1] h
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:54:49PM -0500, Marc Auslander wrote:
> The problem is operator (that's me) stupidity.
>
> I have an overloaded find so I can say find foo and have it mean
> find . -name foo -print
>
> mkinitramfs uses find . | cpio to build the initrd.img
>
ooh, interesting. I wouldn't
The problem is operator (that's me) stupidity.
I have an overloaded find so I can say find foo and have it mean
find . -name foo -print
mkinitramfs uses find . | cpio to build the initrd.img
I have my stuff in the path (yeh i know i know)
I've wasted my time - i deserve it - and your time - yo
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 04:22:10PM -0500, Marc Auslander wrote:
> On 12/13/2007 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>> the command will be something like
>>
>> mkinitramfs -o initrd.img-2.6.18-version-arch -k 2.6.18-version-arch
>> be sure to move the other one aside first. and since you're using
>> lilo
On 12/13/2007 Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
the command will be something like
mkinitramfs -o initrd.img-2.6.18-version-arch -k 2.6.18-version-arch
be sure to move the other one aside first. and since you're using
lilo, make sure you aer aware of what your symlinks are and so forth.
I tried
I tried again - I did in fact (ignore earlier post) see the OK and
clicked on it. initrd.img winds up being 89 bytes long. The output
of the configure follow. The only anomoly is the comment about a
missing link.
There is a /lib/modules/2.6.18-5-686, but it does not contain an entry
names sourc
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 02:36:42PM -0500, Marc Auslander wrote:
>> Marc Auslander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I am running etch on a Dell with ide drives, using LILO
>>>
>>> I just used aptitude to install the latest security update to the
>>> 2.6.18 kernel, 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch5
>>>
>>> The
Graham wrote:
On 13 Dec 2007 10:38:00 -0500
Marc Auslander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am running etch on a Dell with ide drives, using LILO
I just used aptitude to install the latest security update to the
2.6.18 kernel, 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch5
The install produced a message about the fact th
On 13 Dec 2007 10:38:00 -0500
Marc Auslander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am running etch on a Dell with ide drives, using LILO
>
> I just used aptitude to install the latest security update to the
> 2.6.18 kernel, 2.6.18.dfsg.1-13etch5
>
> The install produced a message about the fact that it
> kernel packages named kernel-image-2.4.18-1- with version
2.4.18-13 contain only
> one module.
That and it expects the modules at 2.4.18-1 instead of 2.4.18-1-686-smp!
> hoping this warning is timely and not _too_ redundant,
:-)
Found out the hard way there is a 13.1 now tho' ...
--
T
On (18/03/04 10:52), Ed Sutherland wrote:
> I'm considering moving from YDL -- great Mac hardware support,
> dinosaur-like update schedule -- to Debian. Questions --
>
> What is the latest kernel that supports iMac hardware?
> Is it best to download and burn a Debian ppc distro or use the
> net-
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Adam Majer wrote:
> I'm not sure but since 2.4.15 (I think) all new kernels in 2.4.x series
> are just bug fixes.
I see.
BTW, I think "bug fixes" are more than "just a fix".
Oki
begin Oki DZ quotation:
> I'm using woody; what is the latest kernel that is suitable for the
> distribution?
Any good 2.2 or 2.4 kernel will do. 2.2.20 and 2.4.17 are the latest of
each series, and both seem to work well in my experience.
Craig
pgpyyk1bpWWiL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 10:16:55AM +0700, Oki DZ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using woody; what is the latest kernel that is suitable for the
> distribution?
2.4.17
I'm not sure but since 2.4.15 (I think) all new kernels in 2.4.x series
are just bug fixes.
- Adam
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001 18:24:35 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Hi,
>
> I was looking around debian.org for the latest kernel. Am correct that it
> is currently 2.2.17? I thought there was a new kernel out?
There is a 2.2.18 kernel out.
--
Andrew
2.2.18 is the latest in the 2.2 series, but there's also the 2.4 series now, and
the latest there is 2.4.1.
See http://www.kernel.org instead of the Debian site if you're looking for a
kernel.
Ty
On Fri Feb 16/2001 @ 6:02:P -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was looking around debian.
> I was looking around debian.org for the latest kernel. Am correct that it
> is currently 2.2.17? I thought there was a new kernel out?
2.2.18 and 2.2.19pre.xx in unstable at least...
Martin
37 matches
Mail list logo
