Re: Large Zone Transfers Failing in Latest Buster Update

2024-08-06 Thread Brian
On Friday, August 2, 2024 at 10:51:43 AM EDT, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 10:45:21AM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 10:37 AM Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 10:16:51AM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > > On Fri, Au

Re: Large Zone Transfers Failing in Latest Buster Update

2024-08-02 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 10:45:21AM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 10:37 AM Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 10:16:51AM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 9:13 AM Brian wrote: > > > > > > > > We just ran the latest updates for

Re: Large Zone Transfers Failing in Latest Buster Update

2024-08-02 Thread Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
On 02/08/2024 11:35, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: That new upstream version (9.20.0) is in sid/trixie. Buster has this: You're right, I've been once more confused by the lack of any logical sequence between Debian release codenames. -- We are the people our parents warned us about. Eduardo M K

Re: Large Zone Transfers Failing in Latest Buster Update

2024-08-02 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 10:37 AM Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 10:16:51AM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 9:13 AM Brian wrote: > > > > > > We just ran the latest updates for Debian Buster on one of our DNS > > > servers running bind9 and one of the

Re: Large Zone Transfers Failing in Latest Buster Update

2024-08-02 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 10:16:51AM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 9:13 AM Brian wrote: > > > > We just ran the latest updates for Debian Buster on one of our DNS servers > > running bind9 and one of the slave domains is failing with this message: > > > > Aug 2 07:05:20 na

Re: Large Zone Transfers Failing in Latest Buster Update

2024-08-02 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 10:55:55AM -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: > On 02/08/2024 10:44, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 10:15:38AM -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: > > > Maybe related to https://kb.isc.org/docs/rrset-limits-in-zones ? > > > > > > See also > > > https:/

Re: Large Zone Transfers Failing in Latest Buster Update

2024-08-02 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 9:13 AM Brian wrote: > > We just ran the latest updates for Debian Buster on one of our DNS servers > running bind9 and one of the slave domains is failing with this message: > > Aug 2 07:05:20 named[76759]: transfer of '/IN' from > #53: Transfer status: too many records

Re: Large Zone Transfers Failing in Latest Buster Update

2024-08-02 Thread Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
On 02/08/2024 10:44, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 10:15:38AM -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: Maybe related to https://kb.isc.org/docs/rrset-limits-in-zones ? See also https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2024/msg00145.html (even if it does not directly apply

Re: Large Zone Transfers Failing in Latest Buster Update

2024-08-02 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 10:15:38AM -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: > On 02/08/2024 10:10, Brian wrote: > > We just ran the latest updates for Debian Buster on one of our DNS > > servers running bind9 and one of the slave domains is failing with this > > message: > > > > Aug  2 07:05:20 named[7

Re: Large Zone Transfers Failing in Latest Buster Update

2024-08-02 Thread Brian
On Friday, August 2, 2024 at 09:16:10 AM EDT, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: On 02/08/2024 10:10, Brian wrote: > We just ran the latest updates for Debian Buster on one of our DNS > servers running bind9 and one of the slave domains is failing with this > message: > > Aug  2 07:05:20

Re: Large Zone Transfers Failing in Latest Buster Update

2024-08-02 Thread Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
On 02/08/2024 10:10, Brian wrote: We just ran the latest updates for Debian Buster on one of our DNS servers running bind9 and one of the slave domains is failing with this message: Aug  2 07:05:20 named[76759]: transfer of '/IN' from #53: Transfer status: too many records There are about