John Foster wrote:
> > Maybe having another section of debian would be better: eg
> > main,contrib,non-free,non-US,marginal. [I'm sure someone could come up with
> > a better
> > name than marginal :-)]
> > Marginal would contain really large packages, or packages that very few
> > people might
> Maybe having another section of debian would be better: eg
> main,contrib,non-free,non-US,marginal. [I'm sure someone could come up with a
> better
> name than marginal :-)]
> Marginal would contain really large packages, or packages that very few
> people might
> want to use. If their popular
Richard Dansereau wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> I seem to remember a while back there was a discussion about whether
> or not to include some rather large packages (i.e. ones containing
> data, such as astronomical data) in the Debian releases. I think
> the main consensus was not to include these type
3 matches
Mail list logo
