Re: LaTex Unicode entry issues

On 27/08/2023 10:23, David wrote: On Sun, 2023-08-27 at 10:16 +0700, Max Nikulin wrote: On 26/08/2023 19:08, Haines Brown wrote: \documentclass[12pt]{article} % \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} % \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} % \usepackage[greek,english]{babel} % to make Greek charactes available It se

Re: LaTex Unicode entry issues

On Sun, 2023-08-27 at 10:16 +0700, Max Nikulin wrote: > On 26/08/2023 19:08, Haines Brown wrote: > > \documentclass[12pt]{article} % > > \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} % > > \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} % > > \usepackage[greek,english]{babel} % to make Greek charactes > > available > > It seems, you are

Re: LaTex Unicode entry issues

On 26/08/2023 19:08, Haines Brown wrote: \documentclass[12pt]{article} % \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} % \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} % \usepackage[greek,english]{babel} % to make Greek charactes available It seems, you are overestimating effect. You still need to provide fontenc containing Greek ch

Re: LaTex Unicode entry issues

On 26/08/2023 09:08, Haines Brown wrote: The question is: if my system has access to a character in that it can be pasted, why cannot LaTeX do so as well. Because TeX dates from before Unicode was even being discussed, and does not use the libraries for handling Unicode that the other software

Re: LaTex Unicode entry issues

On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 09:53:23PM +0700, Max Nikulin wrote: > On 25/08/2023 03:24, Haines Brown wrote: > > Now it returns the error: "not set up for use with LaTeX." What does > > this error imply? > > > > This code works to produce an astrisk: > > > > \char"002A > > A complete minimal exam

Re: LaTex Unicode entry issues

Charles Kroeger wrote: > I just have a really large list of UTF-8 characters and if I need one > I copy it and zap it in. I suppose this is not cool but, chacun a son > gout. > > a fun site if you want to write someone in UTF-8 runes. > > https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/ucs/examples/UTF-8-demo.t

Re: LaTex Unicode entry issues

I just have a really large list of UTF-8 characters and if I need one I copy it and zap it in. I suppose this is not cool but, chacun a son gout. a fun site if you want to write someone in UTF-8 runes. https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/ucs/examples/UTF-8-demo.txt ⅩⅩⅥ - Ⅷ - ⅯⅯⅩⅩⅢ -- ☢ ➛ ☠ ➛ ♺

Re: LaTex Unicode entry issues

On 25/08/2023 03:24, Haines Brown wrote: Now it returns the error: "not set up for use with LaTeX." What does this error imply? This code works to produce an astrisk: \char"002A A complete minimal example of LaTeX document may describe better what are you trying to achieve. I believe

Re: LaTeX Unicode entry issues

On 2023-08-24, Haines Brown wrote: > I'm necessarily working with a pdfLaTeX document. You mean LaTeX document compiled with pdflatex ? > My TexLive runs in emacs and automatically changes " to ``. This makes > it annoying to enter Unicode, for I have to paste it from the > terminal. Is there

Re: LaTex Unicode entry issues

On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 06:23:00AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: [...] > Here [1] [...] Gah. The ref: [1] https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/377613/solve-unicode-char-is-not-set-up-for-use-with-latex-without-special-handling-o -- t signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: LaTex Unicode entry issues

On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 04:24:06PM -0400, Haines Brown wrote: > I'm necessarily working with a pdfLaTeX document. > > I seem to recall from long ago that I could enter Unicode > in this way: > > 002B > > Now it returns the error: "not set up for use with LaTeX." What does > this error

Re: LaTex Unicode entry issues

On Thu, 2023-08-24 at 16:24 -0400, Haines Brown wrote: > I'm necessarily  working with a pdfLaTeX document. > > I seem to recall from long ago that I could enter Unicode  > in this way: > >   002B > > Now it returns the error: "not set up for use with LaTeX." What does > this error imply?

Re: LaTeX - Newer REVTEX on Debian ?

Hello, my guess was that the bbl must be updated. Namely, compose with apsrev4-2.bst (or one among the others). I would check which one is actually used in the aux or blg file, and I would check which one is actually pickup with kpsewhich(1). For instance, you can try from a terminal: kpsewhich

Re: LaTeX - Newer REVTEX on Debian ?

I not sure how to update bst. Could you show me how? -- Robbi Nespu D311 B5FF EEE6 0BE8 9C91 FA9E 0C81 FA30 3B3A 80BA https://robbinespu.gitlab.io | https://mstdn.social/@robbinespu

Re: LaTeX - Newer REVTEX on Debian ?

Hi, this looks as a bibtex issue: did you update the bst ? Otherwise, did you try to compose out of TeX Studio, for instance with command lines or latexmk ? Cheers, Jerome On 28/06/2021 03:05, Robbi Nespu wrote: On 6/27/21 2:41 PM, Robbi Nespu wrote: Issuing bug on https://bugs.debian.org/c

Re: LaTeX - Newer REVTEX on Debian ?

On 6/27/21 2:41 PM, Robbi Nespu wrote: Issuing bug on https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=990360 I trying to install it myself, where someone said there is a way how to override it $ wget https://mirrors.concertpass.com/tex-archive/install/macros/latex/contrib/revtex.tds.zip $

Re: LaTeX - Newer REVTEX on Debian ?

On Sunday 27 June 2021 01:27:07 Robbi Nespu wrote: > Hello Debian, > > I want to compile AIP Conference Proceedings LaTeX templates > (https://aip.scitation.org/apc/authors/preppapers) on my machine but I > keep getting: > > Extra \endgroup. \begin{document} > Missing \begin{document}. \

Re: LaTeX - Newer REVTEX on Debian ?

Issuing bug on https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=990360 -- Robbi Nespu D311 B5FF EEE6 0BE8 9C91 FA9E 0C81 FA30 3B3A 80BA https://robbinespu.gitlab.io | https://mstdn.social/@robbinespu

Re: LaTeX to epub

Tom Browder wrote: > Thanks, I'll try that :) -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 https://dataswamp.org/~incal

Re: LaTeX to epub

> On 2020-11-24, Emanuel Berg wrote: > > Can I compile LaTeX to epub? ebook-convert gives an encoding error > > ebook-convert from the PDF I mean and, if "PDF sucks" as people > > say, how is one supposed to do it? what markup is preferred > > for epub? I'm sure you know 'ebook-convert' and 'eboo

Re: LaTeX to epub

On 2020-11-24, Emanuel Berg wrote: > Can I compile LaTeX to epub? ebook-convert gives an encoding error > ebook-convert from the PDF I mean and, if "PDF sucks" as people > say, how is one supposed to do it? what markup is preferred > for epub? > I've only ever heard about 'tex4ebook' and haven't

Re: LaTeX to epub

>> Can I compile LaTeX to epub? > > pandoc can do this but it starts trashing, let's try with > > systemd-run --scope -p MemoryLimit=500M pandoc -o x.epub x.tex Runs out of memory after processing for a long time ... a baad memory leak? -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe857

Re: LaTeX to epub

> Can I compile LaTeX to epub? pandoc can do this but it starts trashing, let's try with systemd-run --scope -p MemoryLimit=500M pandoc -o x.epub x.tex -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 https://dataswamp.org/~incal

Re: LaTeX to HTML converters and comments.

On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:19:47 -0800, peasth...@shaw.ca writes: > tth converts LaTeX to HTML nicely but strips the comments. > The manual remarks "% Comments. Simply removed." Can anyone > suggest a converter which encloses each comment in ? Did you check tex2page[1]. For instance, Scheme specs[2]

Re: LaTeX to HTML converters and comments.

On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:19:47 -0800, peasthope wrote: > tth converts LaTeX to HTML nicely but strips the comments. The manual > remarks "% Comments. Simply removed." Can anyone suggest a converter > which encloses each comment in ? Just out of curiosity, I have been looking for this and could not

Re: LaTeX to HTML converters and comments.

peasth...@shaw.ca writes: > tth converts LaTeX to HTML nicely but strips the comments. > The manual remarks "% Comments. Simply removed." Can anyone > suggest a converter which encloses each comment in ? > what's tth as in debian? i did aptitude search tth but only got this showing up: p

Re: LaTeX, Texlive-luatex, Biber installation procedure

On 10/21/2010 7:48 AM, brownh wrote: +-- | Am I correct to assume that if I install texlive, texlive-luatex, and | CTAN biber in that order, I should end up with a fully functional TeX | Live 2010, with LaTeX2e macros and biblatex support? +-- I use Texlive-latex-recommended and go from there. +-

Re: Latex to html

Abdelkader Belahcene wrote: Alan L Tyree wrote: Hello Bela, I saw your query in the Debian User archives. I'm not a member of the list, so forgive me answering off-list. I use tex4ht. It has a number of scripts that convert LaTeX to html as well as to other formats. It works well even if you ha

Re: Latex to html

On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 12:37:13PM +0100, Abdelkader Belahcene wrote: > Alan L Tyree wrote: >> Hello Bela, >> I saw your query in the Debian User archives. I'm not a member of the >> list, so forgive me answering off-list. >> >> I use tex4ht. It has a number of scripts that convert LaTeX to html as

Re: Latex to html

Alan L Tyree wrote: Hello Bela, I saw your query in the Debian User archives. I'm not a member of the list, so forgive me answering off-list. I use tex4ht. It has a number of scripts that convert LaTeX to html as well as to other formats. It works well even if you have a number of macros and use

Re: latex/maketextfm problem

Florian Kulzer wrote: On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 21:39:47 +0200, Peter Robinson wrote: Samuel Bächler wrote: Peter Robinson wrote: kpathsea: Running mktextfm hv /usr/share/texmf/web2c/mktexnam: Could not map typeface abbreviation v for hv. /usr/share/texmf/web2c/mktexnam: Need to

Re: latex/maketextfm problem

On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 21:39:47 +0200, Peter Robinson wrote: > Samuel Bächler wrote: >> Peter Robinson wrote: >>> kpathsea: Running mktextfm hv >>> /usr/share/texmf/web2c/mktexnam: Could not map typeface abbreviation >>> v for hv. >>> /usr/share/texmf/web2c/mktexnam: Need to update >>> /usr/sh

Re: latex/maketextfm problem

Samuel Bächler wrote: Peter Robinson wrote: kpathsea: Running mktextfm hv /usr/share/texmf/web2c/mktexnam: Could not map typeface abbreviation v for hv. /usr/share/texmf/web2c/mktexnam: Need to update /usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/map/fontname/special.map? mktextfm: Running mf-nowin -progname

Re: latex/maketextfm problem

Peter Robinson wrote: kpathsea: Running mktextfm hv /usr/share/texmf/web2c/mktexnam: Could not map typeface abbreviation v for hv. /usr/share/texmf/web2c/mktexnam: Need to update /usr/share/texmf-texlive/fonts/map/fontname/special.map? mktextfm: Running mf-nowin -progname=mf \mode:=ljfour; mag:

Re: latex to html

On 24 Apr 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am using latex2html to convert files from latex to html, but > latex2html seems not maintened, I have used hevea with mixed results. By and large, I've had better luck with it than with latex2html. This is also on the CTAN FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/cg

Re: latex to html

* abdelkader belahcene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070423 23:20]: > Hi, > I am using latex2html to convert files from latex to html, but > latex2html seems not maintened, and now I have some problems in > conversion, specialy with new special packages. So I want to find > another one, I tried tex4ht not e

Re: latex to html

abdelkader belahcene wrote: > I am using latex2html to convert files from latex to html, > but latex2html seems not maintened, and now I have some > problems in conversion, specialy with new special > packages. So I want to find another one, I tried tex4ht > not enough good for the moment ( for ima

Re: LaTeX -> pdfetex ?

Hello List, it appears that the latex format is built with pdfetex according to `/etc/texmf/fmt.d/10texlive-latex-base.cnf' . So I modified the engine by hand: pdfetex -> tex , and I linked latex to tex : evertything is fine now: what I mean is that `\ifx\pdfoutput\udefined' works as expected.

Re: latex (was Re: Ubuntu vs. Debian (was Re: Introduction))

On Saturday 24 February 2007 16:15, Russell L. Harris wrote: > * tom arnall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070224 17:28]: > > On Saturday 24 February 2007 01:54, Chris Bannister wrote: > >>On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 11:45:09AM -0800, tom arnall wrote: > >>> what about a WYSIWIG which produces latex files? You r

Re: latex (was Re: Ubuntu vs. Debian (was Re: Introduction))

* tom arnall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070224 17:28]: > On Saturday 24 February 2007 01:54, Chris Bannister wrote: >>On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 11:45:09AM -0800, tom arnall wrote: >>> what about a WYSIWIG which produces latex files? You rough out or >>> do easy stuff with the wysiwig, then modify the latex

Re: latex (was Re: Ubuntu vs. Debian (was Re: Introduction))

On Saturday 24 February 2007 01:54, Chris Bannister wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 11:45:09AM -0800, tom arnall wrote: > > what about a WYSIWIG which produces latex files? You rough out or do easy > > stuff with the wysiwig, then modify the latex files if there's stuff not > > easily handled by a

Re: latex (was Re: Ubuntu vs. Debian (was Re: Introduction))

On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:54:30PM +1300 or thereabouts, Chris Bannister wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 11:45:09AM -0800, tom arnall wrote: > > what about a WYSIWIG which produces latex files? You rough out or do easy > > stuff with the wysiwig, then modify the latex files if there's stuff not

Re: latex (was Re: Ubuntu vs. Debian (was Re: Introduction))

On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 11:45:09AM -0800, tom arnall wrote: > what about a WYSIWIG which produces latex files? You rough out or do easy > stuff with the wysiwig, then modify the latex files if there's stuff not > easily handled by a wysiwig. Lyx, but why? Discovered 'gnuhtml2latex'. What a *nea

Re: latex (was Re: Ubuntu vs. Debian (was Re: Introduction))

On Wednesday 21 February 2007 11:52, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 11:45:09AM -0800, tom arnall wrote: > > what a great thread. hopefully we can begin 'subject'ing it properly with > > this mail. > > > > what about a WYSIWIG which produces latex files? You rough out or do easy

Re: latex (was Re: Ubuntu vs. Debian (was Re: Introduction))

On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 11:45:09AM -0800, tom arnall wrote: > > what a great thread. hopefully we can begin 'subject'ing it properly with > this > mail. > > what about a WYSIWIG which produces latex files? You rough out or do easy > stuff with the wysiwig, then modify the latex files if there'

Re: Latex(tetex) refuses to produce dvi

Hi Micha: Please try pdfetex &latex file.tex It seems to work for me, though -output-format latex does not work. Then perhaps try latex &latex file.tex Please also have a look at /etc/texmf/fmt.d and see whether you have the proper .cnf files. Sebastian Canagaratna Department of Chemistry Ohio

Re: latex (tetex) refuses to produce dvi

On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:43:08 + Olafur Jens Sigurdsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, have you tried out latex -output-format dvi .tex? > That is skip the = sign. > Thanks, tried that but it didn't help > I guess you have pdfetex installed and /usr/bin/latex pointing to that > (check by us

Re: latex (tetex) refuses to produce dvi

Hi, have you tried out latex -output-format dvi .tex? That is skip the = sign. I guess you have pdfetex installed and /usr/bin/latex pointing to that (check by using which /usr/bin/latex) HTH Oli Þann 2007-02-15, 17:59:07 (+0200) skrifaði Micha Feigin: > Sorry, this was supposed to be sent to t

Re: latex (tetex) refuses to produce dvi

On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 17:59 +0200, Micha Feigin wrote: > Sorry, this was supposed to be sent to the list > > On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 20:58:49 -0600 > "Russell L. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > * Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070214 20:43]: > > > I tried to produce dvi output from a

Re: latex (tetex) refuses to produce dvi

Sorry, this was supposed to be sent to the list On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 20:58:49 -0600 "Russell L. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070214 20:43]: > > I tried to produce dvi output from a tex file I have and latex just > > refuses to do it. I tried: > > la

Re: latex (tetex) refuses to produce dvi

* Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070214 20:43]: > I tried to produce dvi output from a tex file I have and latex just refuses to > do it. I tried: > latex -output-format=dvi .tex > And it's as if the option is not there, I just get a pdf file again. > How do I force latex to produce a dvi file?

[SOLVED] Re: LaTeX: C package

Thank you very much!!! :) It's running!!! :) Romulo Sousa On 9/12/06, WANG Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 10:53:27PM -0300, Romulo Sousa wrote: > Hi folks, > > How can I do to add a C code on my LaTeX? I'm looking for the > usepackage (also on the lshort.pdf) but I can't

Re: LaTeX: C package

On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 10:53:27PM -0300, Romulo Sousa wrote: > Hi folks, > > How can I do to add a C code on my LaTeX? I'm looking for the > usepackage (also on the lshort.pdf) but I can't find it. You may try listings macro package for that, and it is provided by tetex-extra -- Wang Xu -- T

Re: latex letterpaper & dvipdf

On 2/9/06, Michael Marsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/9/06, roberto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > i am struggling at writing a paper and i have to respect the options > > "letterpaper" > > which is default in IEEEtran.cls > > but when i open the pdf by acrobat it defaults to > > 8.26*11.69in

Re: latex letterpaper & dvipdf

On 2/9/06, roberto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i am struggling at writing a paper and i have to respect the options > "letterpaper" > which is default in IEEEtran.cls > but when i open the pdf by acrobat it defaults to > 8.26*11.69in > > instead of: > 8.50*11in > > my header contains: > > \documen

Re: latex notes

On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 10:06:45AM +0100, Jan T. Kim wrote: > > On 10/13/05, Victor Munoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > The 'article' class should be enough, as mentioned in other posts. > > > > > > \documentstyle{article} > > > > > Indeed -- use the class, i.e. > > \documentclass{ar

Re: latex notes

On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 03:23:41AM -0500, roberto wrote: > On 10/13/05, Victor Munoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 04:05:17PM +0200, roberto wrote: > > > i have to write down some simple mathematical notes for my co-workers > > > > The 'article' class should be enough, as m

Re: latex notes

On 10/13/05, Victor Munoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 04:05:17PM +0200, roberto wrote: > > i have to write down some simple mathematical notes for my co-workers > > The 'article' class should be enough, as mentioned in other posts. > > \documentstyle{article} > > \begin{doc

Re: latex notes

On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 04:05:17PM +0200, roberto wrote: > hello > i have to write down some simple mathematical notes for my co-workers > and i need to write them down in latex, of course > is there any simple document class without any title, bibliography and > so on, just something to write a fe

Re: latex notes

roberto wrote: hello i have to write down some simple mathematical notes for my co-workers and i need to write them down in latex, of course is there any simple document class without any title, bibliography and so on, just something to write a few formulas and some comments on them? thank you

Re: latex notes

--- roberto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hello > i have to write down some simple mathematical notes for my co-workers > and i need to write them down in latex, of course > is there any simple document class without any title, bibliography > and > so on, just something to write a few formulas an

Re: latex notes

roberto wrote: > hello > i have to write down some simple mathematical notes for my co-workers > and i need to write them down in latex, of course > is there any simple document class without any title, bibliography and > so on, just something to write a few formulas and some comments on > them? >

Re: latex notes

AmSLaTeX is your friend: see http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/info/lshort/english/lshort.pdf for further and quick informations hth, Jerome roberto wrote: hello i have to write down some simple mathematical notes for my co-workers and i need to write them down in latex, of course is there any

Re: latex notes

roberto wrote: > hello > i have to write down some simple mathematical notes for my co-workers > and i need to write them down in latex, of course > is there any simple document class without any title, bibliography and > so on, just something to write a few formulas and some comments on > them? >

Re: LATEx help plzz ??

On 22-08-2005, at 04h 40'11", Sameen Khan wrote about "LATEx help plzz ??" > hi sir > > i want to LATEX only LATEX plz tell me the link frm > whr i can download LATEX plzz > > pl reply me > > Sameen > > Your question is offtopic. debian-user@lists.debian.org is for users of Debian O

Re: LATEx help plzz ??

On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 04:40 -0700, Sameen Khan wrote: > hi sir > > i want to LATEX only LATEX plz tell me the link frm > whr i can download LATEX plzz You can't have 'only LATEX' because it runs on top of TeX. Try: 'apt-get install tetex-bin' Also See:

Re: LATEx help plzz ??

Hi! On 8/22/05, Sameen Khan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i want to LATEX only LATEX I don't understand what you highlight here... > plz tell me the link frm > whr i can download LATEX plzz Did you had a look at www.ctan.org already? -- __ *

Re: LATEx help plzz ??

On Monday 22 August 2005 12:40, Sameen Khan wrote: > hi sir > > i want to LATEX only LATEX plz tell me the link frm > whr i can download LATEX plzz > > pl reply me > > Sameen I think he wants LATEX -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C

Re: Latex Q - page number appears on pg 1 with empty pagestyle

On May 31 2005, Christiane Reher wrote: > Try this \addtocounter{page}{-1} > This worked for me! I think that the proper/clean way to avoid numbers on the first page is to issue the command: \thispagestyle{empty} right before the contents of what will be in the first page. Hope this helps, Rog

Re: LaTeX with Emacs

Ali Nassar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am using emacs on Debian-Linux to edit LaTex files. Is there any tool in > emacs to make a delimiter check? I believe M-x check-parens will do it. -- Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - I am the rocks. Bad DM!:Put the Hand of Vecna in the bag with the r

Re: LaTeX with Emacs

Ali Nassar wrote: Hi All, I am using emacs on Debian-Linux to edit LaTex files. Is there any tool in emacs to make a delimiter check? I mean to count the number of left delimiters in the file and compare it with the number of right delimiters and then give me an error message if a delimiter is miss

Re: LaTeX with Emacs

El Martes, 28 de Septiembre de 2004 20:04, Ali Nassar escribió: > Hi All, > > I am using emacs on Debian-Linux to edit LaTex files. Is there any tool in > emacs to make a delimiter check? I mean to count the number of left > delimiters in the file and compare it with the number of right delimiters

Re: LaTeX with Emacs

On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 08:04:10PM +0200, Ali Nassar wrote: > Hi All, > > I am using emacs on Debian-Linux to edit LaTex files. Is there any tool in > emacs to make a delimiter check? I mean to count the number of left > delimiters in the file and compare it with the number of right delimiters > a

Re: latex search in the \input files in vim

On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 11:38:03PM -0500, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: > I have this huge latex file (master.tex) which has many other tex files > inputted into it (through say \input{file1.tex}, \input{file2.tex} ). I > am using vim editor to edit the master.tex file. Now is there any way to > se

Re: latex & prosper

On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 08:29:21PM +0530, Sridhar M.A. wrote: > Will this not be easier? > > FILE = presentation > > all: pdf > > clean: > rm -rf *.dvi > rm -rf *.pdf > rm -rf *.log > rm -rf *.out > > pdf: > latex $(FILE) > lat

Re: latex & prosper

On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 02:43:02PM +0100, Roman Joost wrote: > > Find enclosed my Makefile to produce prosper PDF files. Hope it will > help ... > Will this not be easier? FILE = presentation all: pdf clean: rm -rf *.dvi rm -rf *.pdf rm

Re: latex & prosper

On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 02:13:24AM +0200, gustavo wrote: > Hello > > Please I need some help with LaTeX. > I can't get working prosper class (And other ones that also are for > presentations). > I try every think. For example I was take a 'Example.tex' from > "/usr/doc/prosper/examples/"

Re: latex & prosper

On 29 Dec 2003, gustavo wrote: > Hello > > Please I need some help with LaTeX. > I can't get working prosper class (And other ones that also are for > presentations). > I try every think. For example I was take a 'Example.tex' from > "/usr/doc/prosper/examples/" > Run it with elatex (and

Re: latex stoped handling tif images?

Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The various error lines: >>From elatex: > > ! LaTeX Error: Cannot determine size of graphic in >.../blackboard_i0.tif (no BoundingBox). > <.../blackboard_flattened.tif>! Unable to read an entire > line---bufsize=20. > Please increase

Re: LaTeX vs. lout

On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 07:36:12PM +0200, Elie De Brauwer wrote: > > That seems indeed like an excellent tutorial, I learned LaTeX from the 'Not so > short introduction to latex2e' (can be found at > http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~oetiker/lshort/) It can also be found in the tetex-doc package: /

Re: LaTeX vs. lout

On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 03:48:59PM +0200, Jon Haugsand wrote: > * David Fokkema > > Well, there has been some discussion, for sure. > > > > See: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2003/debian-user-200307/msg02025 > > Cannot find this one at all. (404 Not found). I may have had some > email

Re: LaTeX vs. lout

* David Fokkema > Well, there has been some discussion, for sure. > > See: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2003/debian-user-200307/msg02025 Cannot find this one at all. (404 Not found). I may have had some email problems, so that I have lost the messages in question. -- Jon Haugsand, [E

Re: LaTeX vs. lout

On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:01:52PM +0200, Jon Haugsand wrote: > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Thanks for the interesting answers. In the end I'm going to stick to LaTeX. > > I cannot find a single message discussion lout in the debian-user > mailing list. Well, there has been some discussion, for sure.

Re: LaTeX vs. lout

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Thanks for the interesting answers. In the end I'm going to stick to LaTeX. I cannot find a single message discussion lout in the debian-user mailing list. -- Jon Haugsand, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.norges-bank.no -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: LaTeX vs. lout

On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 01:44:35PM +, Vittorio wrote: > Thanks for the interesting answers. In the end I'm going to stick to LaTeX. > > As a matter of fact, in an Italian newsgroup "a LaTeX expert" said > that the disadvantage of LaTeX was its not being a "functional > typesetting language" bu

Re: LaTeX vs. lout

Thanks for the interesting answers. In the end I'm going to stick to LaTeX. As a matter of fact, in an Italian newsgroup "a LaTeX expert" said that the disadvantage of LaTeX was its not being a "functional typesetting language" but a macro language to work with it is necessary to put together heap

Re: LaTeX vs. lout

On Wednesday 16 July 2003 22:43, Rajkumar S wrote: > Magnus Therning wrote: > > The free LaTeX documentation that is available is pretty good, and it > > is sufficient for most people > > An excellent LaTeX tutorial is available at > http://www.tug.org.in/tutorials.html > > raj That seems indeed l

Re: LaTeX vs. lout

Magnus Therning wrote: The free LaTeX documentation that is available is pretty good, and it is sufficient for most people An excellent LaTeX tutorial is available at http://www.tug.org.in/tutorials.html raj -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble

Re: LaTeX vs. lout

On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 06:50:25PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Vittorio [debian-user] <15/07/03 18:12 +>: > > Has anyone of you debianists used the two typesetting systems? > > > > What are your impressions? > > > > Ciao > > Vittorio > > > > Sorry friends, I restate my question: > >

Re: LaTeX vs. lout

Vittorio [debian-user] <15/07/03 18:12 +>: > Has anyone of you debianists used the two typesetting systems? > > What are your impressions? > > Ciao > Vittorio > Sorry friends, I restate my question: I've been using latex and the likes (ConTeXt, LyX) satifactorily for a couple of years. Co

Re: LaTeX vs. lout

On Tuesday 15 Jul 2003 7:12 pm, Vittorio wrote: > Has anyone of you debianists used the two typesetting systems? > > What are your impressions? Used the LyX frontend to latex and i think it is great. Tom -- ^__^ Tom Badran (oo)\__Imperial College (__)\ )\/\

Re: LaTex editor

On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 01:28:22AM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > lyx: > Installed: (none) > Candidate: 1.2.2-1 > Version Table: > 1.2.2-1 0 > 50 http://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/main Packages > > If you need to install it into stable, I think you nee

Re: LaTex editor

On 31 Jan 2003 16:50:08 -0500 "Mark L. Kahnt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm surprised nobody mentioned TeXmacs if you are running X (also a > requirement for LyX, btw, so if you are a fan of a strictly text > (and maybe SVGAlib or FrameBuffer,) then emacs or vi, or maybe even > ae, are appropri

Re: LaTex editor

Andrew Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Emacs... what else is there? (ducks) Xemacs!! or for something lighweight, Jed/Xjed Glyn -- Debian Home http://www.debian.org Debian Planet http://www.debianplanet.org/ For the children http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-jr/ In a hurry??

Re: LaTex editor

On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 01:35:36PM -0800, Virgil wrote: > True...but I do not believe you'll find the latest version 1.2.2 as a > debian package. Last time I checked, the deb package is quite outdated > (1.16?). You can however install from source. See www.lyx.org Believe it :-) lyx: Installed:

Re: LaTex editor

ian wrote: >I would like to know a good TEX editor...any recommendations? Emacs is my editor of choice for nearly everything. I am learning to like Cooledit. It's a very lightweight editor with syntax highlighting for several languages, including LaTeX2e. -- gt [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: LaTex editor

Maybe this link will work. The author of this book: http://www.softpro.com/0-07-138880-x.html used LyX. I apologize for shamefully plugging a relative's work. Mike On Friday 31 January 2003 16:08, Lars Jensen wrote: > LyX - a debian package - is a front end for LaTeX. Does everything you > need

Re: LaTex editor

The author of this book: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/007138880X/qid=1012937772/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_67_1/103-1153374-9935838 used LyX. I apologize for shamefully plugging a relative's work. Mike On Friday 31 January 2003 16:08, Lars Jensen wrote: > LyX - a debian package - is a front end f

Re: LaTex editor

On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 16:08, Lars Jensen wrote: > LyX - a debian package - is a front end for LaTeX. Does everything you > need. > > Lars. > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Antonio Rodriguez wrote: > > > emacs + auctex > > - Original Message - > > From: "ian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "debian"

Re: LaTex editor

True...but I do not believe you'll find the latest version 1.2.2 as a debian package. Last time I checked, the deb package is quite outdated (1.16?). You can however install from source. See www.lyx.org __Virgil --- Lars Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > LyX - a debian package - is a front end f

  1   2   3   4   >