B. Alexander wrote:
I started looking in this direction myself last night. I am, for the life
of me, unable to figure why or how drives are designated as early versus
non-early. With the exception of adding "noearly" to the options in
/etc/cryptab. However, I am unable to find a single partition
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 3:57 AM, B. Alexander wrote:
> I use LUKS drive encryption on several machines on my network. The problem I
> have is that every time I attempt to set up LVM which spans multiple drives,
> it decrypts the first one, then panics because it can't see the rest of the
what is
B. Alexander wrote:
> I'm really not comfortable with modifying something like that, not because
> I can't, but rather because I don't want to tweak something and have it
> break on the next upgrade. So I will take the latter suggestion. I want to
> build a test box to see if I can further trouble
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 12:45 PM, thib wrote:
> ...
> but consider encrypting the logical volume instead of the physical
> volumes. It makes much more sense to me.
>
It seems to me that
> Does anyone know the right way to get the drives decrypted first?
>>
>
> The fun might take place in yo
B. Alexander wrote:
[snip]
The fix is probably simple, but I haven't found the right combination of
secret sauce to get all drives decrypted before the system issues vgchange
-a y, which results in a panic or other Bad Things.
I'd say the design of your setup is the problem. Obviously, this d
5 matches
Mail list logo
