Re: LLS: Debian/Redhat Alliance

1999-04-21 Thread John Hasler
RickM writes: > Sorry, I don't recognize the author's name. Is this an official Debian > initiative? No. It isn't even an unofficial one. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler) Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI

Re: LLS: Debian/Redhat Alliance

1999-04-20 Thread Martin Bialasinski
>> "LS" == Lyno Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: LS> People interested in becoming a volunteer producer, in the free LS> software community, will more likely use the Debian distribution. LS> Debian will become the nexus of the volunteer based, development LS> community. Why should this be th

Re: LLS: Debian/Redhat Alliance

1999-04-20 Thread Lyno Sullivan
I seem to be creating some kind of technical problem because of the mail address 'Lyno Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' I am using.  Sorry for any inconvenience I might be causing.  I am trying to sort out what I am doing and how to remedy the situation. Most assuredly this is not any official ini

Re: LLS: Debian/Redhat Alliance

1999-04-20 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Tue, 20 Apr 1999, Lyno Sullivan wrote: > As soon as I get a chance I am going to write an article recommending that > Redhat and Debian form an alliance. Redhat becomes the distributor to 1) > commercial operations and 2) people who are only interested in being free > software consumers. Sorr