On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:42:31AM -0400, Germana Oliveira wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Some service (software) companies have been telling us 'not to use
> ldap for user authentication' instead they recommend us to use
> Microsoft Active Directory, this because, they say, LDAP is
> problematic, talking about
Hi germana,
I have been searching for some tools (free software tools) and i have
found some:
Maybe these links will interest you also:
http://www.ldap-account-manager.org/
and
http://ldapadmin.sourceforge.net/
regards,
mj
--
www.muzieknoteren.nl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-
I have been searching for some tools (free software tools) and i have found
some:
Apache Directory Server: looks good but i dont like the java stuff. "Apache
Directory Server is an open source LDAP directory server implemented in
java."
GOsa: looks very good and development in php, could be a goo
Please don't top post
Germana Oliveira schreef:
So, you're telling me that ADS/LDAP do the same thing you can do just
with LDAP (without the interface) .. i mean, a directory service.
Groups, rights and security is manage by the OS itself ¿?.
What Active Directory does is to give you the faci
So, you're telling me that ADS/LDAP do the same thing you can do just with
LDAP (without the interface) .. i mean, a directory service. Groups, rights
and security is manage by the OS itself ¿?.
What Active Directory does is to give you the facility to manage all those
things together?
But with De
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 05:31:57PM -0400, Germana Oliveira wrote:
> i just forgot something.
>
> AD manage the (user) permissions and groups stuff: Like - this user can
> access to this printer or that user can not use pen drive - and i haven`t
> found yet something like that in free Software, or
i just forgot something.
AD manage the (user) permissions and groups stuff: Like - this user can
access to this printer or that user can not use pen drive - and i haven`t
found yet something like that in free Software, or something similar in LDAP
or with LDAP (openLdap)
Someone have some idea
2
We are really convince that OpenLDAP is way better choice than Active
Directory, most if we already decide that Debian is going to be our Servers
OS...
i have been googling about openLdap problems and found nothing very
difficult or weird, most of then are user problems: bad configurations, etc.
Germana Oliveira wrote:
Hi!
Some service (software) companies have been telling us 'not to use
ldap for user authentication' instead they recommend us to use
Microsoft Active Directory, this because, they say, LDAP is
problematic, talking about domain, and hard to use - for example is
very comp
9 matches
Mail list logo