On Friday 14 November 2003 06:27, Ken Gilmour wrote:
> im sure that if theres a way to configure one to, in a sense "crossover" it
> might work.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Ken Gilmour
> You may be beautiful but they're keeping my idea on file.
>
> Registered Linux User # 330371
> http://counter.li.org
>
im sure that if theres a way to configure one to, in a sense "crossover" it might work.
Best Regards,
Ken Gilmour
You may be beautiful but they're keeping my idea on file.
Registered Linux User # 330371
http://counter.li.org
Replying to the message sent by Adam Galant on Fri, 14 Nov 2003 11:5
Hi.
I'm not quite sure, but I think you need an acess point - a device similar
to hub for 'copper' LANs. I don't think two wireless LAN cards can talk to
each other directly (although, as I said, I am not quite sure).
Regards,
Adam
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Japox wrote:
> I have just recently bou
Look at dnsmasq package (thekelleys.org.uk I think - or
just google find). Its simple and easy and much better
than bind for small LANS. Excellent!
On Thursday 31 January 2002 20:11, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Hello all,
> I've got my LAN set up and running, and so far so good.
> I'm using a gat
Thus spake Jason Majors:
> I'd suspect exim is set up incorrectly then. Run eximconfig and set up all
> your boxes as type 1 (Internet Site). That's how mine is setup. But I have
> fetchmail running on my mail server pull mail from the other boxes, so I
> only have one mail account to check. But I
> I've got my LAN set up and running, and so far so good. I'm using a
> gateway/router/firewall (hadrian) to stop unwanted traffic and allow
> internet access and LAN access to everybody else. Then I have
> gashuffer, my main workstation, and a Win box that my girlfriend uses,
> and an occasional
6 matches
Mail list logo
