Re: LAN Recognition Problem

On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 08:58:36PM +0100, Karl E. Jorgensen wrote: > Hi > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 01:53:52PM -0400, Thomas H. George wrote: > > I have two computers connected to the LAN, one my desktop running Wheezy > > and the other a RaspberryPi running Wheezy-Raspbian. > > > > The Raspberry

Re: LAN Recognition Problem

On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 13:53:52 -0400 "Thomas H. George" wrote: > I have two computers connected to the LAN, one my desktop running > Wheezy and the other a RaspberryPi running Wheezy-Raspbian. > > The RaspberryPi can successfully ping all the devices on the LAN, the > desktop, the printer, the gat

Re: LAN Recognition Problem

Hi On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 01:53:52PM -0400, Thomas H. George wrote: > I have two computers connected to the LAN, one my desktop running Wheezy > and the other a RaspberryPi running Wheezy-Raspbian. > > The RaspberryPi can successfully ping all the devices on the LAN, the > desktop, the printer,

Re: LAN mail server

On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 06:17:25AM -, rocky wrote: > Hey list, > > My desktop has Debian Etch running on it. In order to learn DNS, mail > server stuff, I installed bind9, apache2, sendmail and ipopd. I have I don't want to start a flamewar, but do you have any special reasons to learn sendm

Re: LAN problem with Etch (and konqueror resolved)

On Monday 11 December 2006 01:00, Nigel Henry wrote: > On Monday 11 December 2006 00:16, Marko Randjelovic wrote: > > Nigel Henry wrote: > > > Sorry for my ignorance. I have the zeroconf package installed. what is > > > the syntax needed to purge it? > > > > > > Nigel > > > > It should be > > > > a

Re: LAN problem with Etch (Part 2)

On Monday 11 December 2006 01:00, Nigel Henry wrote: > On Monday 11 December 2006 00:16, Marko Randjelovic wrote: > > Nigel Henry wrote: > > > Sorry for my ignorance. I have the zeroconf package installed. what is > > > the syntax needed to purge it? > > > > > > Nigel > > > > It should be > > > > a

Re: LAN

At 1149233095 past the epoch, Peter Vandenabeele wrote: > If want to add the security of ssh/scp to it, try sftp > (but that may slow down the transfer speed due to > encryption/decryption). Or speed it up, with compressible data, by supplying the -C command. I think you can also ask SSH to use a

Re: LAN

On 6/1/06, Francesco Pietra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My system consists of two machines, one running debian 32 testing and equipped with KDE, the other one amd64 debian testing with no GUI (undesired) and only X-system and window manager twm. Both operated by single user. Both are connected A

Re: LAN

On 6/1/06, Francesco Pietra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My system consists of two machines, one running debian 32 testing and equipped with KDE, the other one amd64 debian testing with no GUI (undesired) and only X-system and window manager twm. Both operated by single user. Both are connected A

Re: LAN

On 6/1/06, Francesco Pietra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My system consists of two machines, one running debian 32 testing and equipped with KDE, the other one amd64 debian testing with no GUI (undesired) and only X-system and window manager twm. Both operated by single user. Both are connected A

Re: LAN

Francesco Pietra wrote: My system consists of two machines, one running debian 32 testing and equipped with KDE, the other one amd64 debian testing with no GUI (undesired) and only X-system and window manager twm. Both operated by single user. Both are connected ADSL through to a common 4-por

Re: LAN & DHCP/DDNS name

Oliver Lupton wrote: On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:51:55 +1100 Neil Dugan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi I have a LAN with DHCP and DDNS running, I have just installed Debian on one of the computers. This new computer isn't specifying a name when doing the DHCP lookup, so the DDNS hasn't got a usefu

Re: LAN & DHCP/DDNS name

On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:51:55 +1100 Neil Dugan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi I have a LAN with DHCP and DDNS running, I have just installed Debian > on one of the computers. This new computer isn't specifying a name when > doing the DHCP lookup, so the DDNS hasn't got a useful name for it to u

RE: LAN APT-GET ?

Grant wrote: > Hey, > > Just wondering if i was to download all debian woody cd's > could i copy > the contents to a folder on my Intranet server and use that as an > apt-get source... as every UK apt-get source seems to give me errors > or is missing parts. > > It would only be for LAN access an

Re: LAN APT-GET ?

On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 17:21:54 +0100 Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey, > > Just wondering if i was to download all debian woody cd's could i copy > > the contents to a folder on my Intranet server and use that as an > apt-get source... as every UK apt-get source seems to give me errors > or

Re: LAN down after installing kernel 2.4.24-1-k7

Thanks, Andreas, it's working now. -- Marc Shapiro "If you drink melomel every day you will live to be 150, unless your wife shoots you first." -- Dr. Ferenc Androci -- (Winemaker, Little Hungary Farm Winery) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: LAN down after installing kernel 2.4.24-1-k7

Hello Marc Shapiro (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: > I am running Sarge, and have been using kernel 2.4.18-bf2.4. I want > to install a newer kernel and decided on 2.4.24-1-k7 (my box has an > Athlon 2000+). After the install, however, I am unable to access the > other box on my home LAN. The re

Re: LAN setup

On Friday 14 November 2003 06:27, Ken Gilmour wrote: > im sure that if theres a way to configure one to, in a sense "crossover" it > might work. > > Best Regards, > > Ken Gilmour > You may be beautiful but they're keeping my idea on file. > > Registered Linux User # 330371 > http://counter.li.org >

Re: LAN setup

im sure that if theres a way to configure one to, in a sense "crossover" it might work. Best Regards, Ken Gilmour You may be beautiful but they're keeping my idea on file. Registered Linux User # 330371 http://counter.li.org Replying to the message sent by Adam Galant  on Fri, 14 Nov 2003 11:5

Re: LAN setup

Hi. I'm not quite sure, but I think you need an acess point - a device similar to hub for 'copper' LANs. I don't think two wireless LAN cards can talk to each other directly (although, as I said, I am not quite sure). Regards, Adam On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Japox wrote: > I have just recently bou

Re: LAN Saturated by Unwanted Transmission

Hi, > I have three debian boxes on a wireless LAN. Wnen my grandson's Windows > XP is included on the LAN it saturates the system with transmissions. I > installed tcpdump which shows repeated lines of transmissions to > 172.179.211.254.1781 > > I set up the LAN with no difficulty but I have z

Re: LAN Saturated by Unwanted Transmission

On Sunday 22 June 2003 18:29, Thomas H. George wrote: > I have three debian boxes on a wireless LAN. Wnen my grandson's Windows > XP is included on the LAN it saturates the system with transmissions. I > installed tcpdump which shows repeated lines of transmissions to > 172.179.211.254.1781 > >

Re: LAN Mailserver - what packages

FWIW, I've been happily using uw-imapd, exim, mailscanner, spamassassin and the f-prot virus scanner in conjunction with Outlook (97,98,2000,XP) and evolution. Haven't experienced any real problems with that setup, YMMV. j. -- Jeremy L. Gaddis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >

Re: LAN IPv6 global connectivity HOWTO

On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 19:52, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote: > > [..] Your construction of the EUI-64 is off a bit... [..] Thanks a million for your explanation : turns out I had really not understood how to produce an address. As a result, I rewrote sections 6.1 "Setting up the router's LAN interface" and

Re: LAN IPv6 global connectivity HOWTO

Jim, The only comment I woudl make on your howto is in section 6.2 "Setting up the router's LAN interface" you appear to be trying to setup an EUI-64 address that other machines on your LAN will build on their own if autoconf is enabled... However your construction of the EUI-64 is off a b

Re: LAN: (Linksys Cable/DSL router) + (Deb/Win98 dual boot) + (Woody)

On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 06:55:31AM -0500, Antonio Rodriguez wrote: > 1. How do I connect from the outside world with the elements of my LAN? > Is it http://router-ip/specific-computer? I am clueless. Read the Linksys documentation on port forwarding. It's under the "advanced" tab in the router set

Re: lan problems

Cannot ping anything either way [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: lan problems

> > My debian pc cannot connect to my two other pc's that run win98, however > > when i boot it under win98 the lan works fine. > > Could you specify "cannot connect"? Do you are unable to use samba > shares? Or does not even a ping get through? > > -- > > cu > Alex >

Re: lan problems

* Pierre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020502 16:00]: > My debian pc cannot connect to my two other pc's that run win98, however > when i boot it under win98 the lan works fine. Could you specify "cannot connect"? Do you are unable to use samba shares? Or does not even a ping get through? -- cu Alex

Re: LAN to Internet gateway problem [solved]

On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 23:21:47 +0100 "Tony Crawford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stephan Hachinger wrote (on 25 Feb 2002 at 17:36): > > > machine I want to configure as router is 192.168.90.95 (stephan). > > Stephan has a second network card inside (192.168.37.95) and > > connects to the internet

Re: LAN to Internet gateway problem

On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 17:36:31 +0100, Stephan Hachinger wrote: >Hi! > >I'm trying to configure one of my machines as a router to the >internet, so that I can access the internet from my LAN. My second >computer in my lan is 192.168.90.5 (pentiumdioxid), this machine I >want to configure as router is

Re: LAN to Internet gateway problem

Stephan Hachinger wrote (on 25 Feb 2002 at 17:36): > machine I want to configure as router is 192.168.90.95 (stephan). > Stephan has a second network card inside (192.168.37.95) and > connects to the internet over this card and dsl (pppoE). Now, > this is what I've tried: > > -Modifying the route

Re: LAN setup

Look at dnsmasq package (thekelleys.org.uk I think - or just google find). Its simple and easy and much better than bind for small LANS. Excellent! On Thursday 31 January 2002 20:11, Stephen Gran wrote: > Hello all, > I've got my LAN set up and running, and so far so good. > I'm using a gat

Re: LAN setup

Thus spake Jason Majors: > I'd suspect exim is set up incorrectly then. Run eximconfig and set up all > your boxes as type 1 (Internet Site). That's how mine is setup. But I have > fetchmail running on my mail server pull mail from the other boxes, so I > only have one mail account to check. But I

Re: LAN setup

> I've got my LAN set up and running, and so far so good. I'm using a > gateway/router/firewall (hadrian) to stop unwanted traffic and allow > internet access and LAN access to everybody else. Then I have > gashuffer, my main workstation, and a Win box that my girlfriend uses, > and an occasional

RE: LAN traffic

try iptraf > -Original Message- > From: Eduardo Gargiulo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 9:45 AM > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: LAN traffic > > > Hi all. > > I have a masquerading linux boxx running between Internet and my > Internal LAN. > I

Re: LAN/NAS problem.

The address you are using is the "network" address for that /27 range. This would not be considered as a valid address for any *interface* on that network. Typically I would expect to see the first valid address in the subnet as the gateway address in this case it would be 203.28.51.129 - and yo

Re: LAN/NAS problem.

On Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 12:10:01PM +1000, Marc-Adrian Napoli wrote > hi all, > Hello, Marc! > we have an ascend server that serves a dial up customer sitting on > 203.28.51.128. > > routing table on the ascend server: > > 203.28.51.128/27 203.28.51.128 wan12rGT120 265755

Re: LAN access fails after 5 seconds

Thanks for the tips. The nasa search found the same tulip.c source code, but that's a useful search technique to know about. I finally got the source for tulip.c to compile by adding a -I option to the gcc line--and that fixed the problem! BUT-- Does anyone know what include files gcc uses by d

Re: LAN access fails after 5 seconds

A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said... [snip familiar problems with tulip-based cards] > I should mention the exact same hardware works fine under Windoze 98. Under > Linux, "ifconfig" shows the card using the same irq and memory as it did > under Windoze. I expected as much.

Re: LAN access fails after 5 seconds

what is the full output of ifconfig? it shows packets sent/recieved dropped, errors collisions etc. i have a tulip card as well(2.0.36 kernel though) eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:40:05:30:FF:19 inet addr:208.222.179.31 Bcast:208.222.179.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 UP

Re: Lan Tcp/ip Question

ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: Lan Tcp/ip Question > Resent-Date: 21 Jul 1998 12:46:06 - > Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ; > > On Mon, J

Re: Lan Tcp/ip Question

omt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Michael B. Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: Lan Tcp/ip Question > Resent-Date: 21 Jul 1998 03:40:35 - > Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Resent-cc: recipient list not shown:

Re: Lan Tcp/ip Question

o: Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: Lan Tcp/ip Question > Resent-Date: 20 Jul 1998 23:43:27 - > Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ; > > At 10:44 PM 7/19/1998 -0700, you wrote:

RE: Lan Tcp/ip Question

0 > From: Patrick Ouellette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: RE: Lan Tcp/ip Question > Resent-Date: 20 Jul 1998 17:48:00 - > Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ; &

Re: Lan Tcp/ip Question

At 08:52 PM 7/23/1998 +1000, you wrote: >> >It may be useful for you to assign the NIC's address to something >> >other than 0x300. A lot of different (very different even!) cards try >> >to use 0x300 (sound cards, primarily). >> Theres a sound card in the machine but its sitting on 0x330 >> >Also

Re: Lan Tcp/ip Question

On Thu, 23 Jul 1998, Craig Sanders wrote: > On Mon, 20 Jul 1998, Tomt wrote: > > > At 10:44 PM 7/19/1998 -0700, you wrote: > > >It may be useful for you to assign the NIC's address to something > > >other than 0x300. A lot of different (very different even!) cards try > > >to use 0x300 (sound car

Re: Lan Tcp/ip Question

On Mon, 20 Jul 1998, Tomt wrote: > At 10:44 PM 7/19/1998 -0700, you wrote: > >It may be useful for you to assign the NIC's address to something > >other than 0x300. A lot of different (very different even!) cards try > >to use 0x300 (sound cards, primarily). > > Theres a sound card in the machine

Re: Lan Tcp/ip Question

On Mon, Jul 20, 1998 at 10:35:43AM -0500, Tomt wrote: > At 10:02 PM 7/20/1998 -0400, you wrote: > I have no gateway defined on either machine do I need one? route add -net...eth0 is sufficient to tell the Debian box to look for any machine on your local network through eth0. You also need some ki

Re: Lan Tcp/ip Question

At 10:02 PM 7/20/1998 -0400, you wrote: >I assume you have tcp/ip installed on the NT machine. It doesnt come that >way out of the box. I think you have to install tcp/ip to even assign an ip >address. Make sure you reran SP3 after installing tcp/ip from the NT cd. Been there, done that. >My Deb

Re: Lan Tcp/ip Question

I have a Debian<-->NTsp3 network working. I am certianly no expert, but I will be glad to work with you on this. I assume you have tcp/ip installed on the NT machine. It doesnt come that way out of the box. I think you have to install tcp/ip to even assign an ip address. Make sure you reran

RE: Lan Tcp/ip Question

At 01:47 PM 7/20/1998 -0400, you wrote: >Do you have the IP-Masquerade / IP-Firewall package installed? (I forget >the actual name.) I had similar problems after installing the ipmasq >tools. Seems the install scripts set up a really strict rules set to >protect the Linux machine from attack over

Re: Lan Tcp/ip Question

At 10:44 PM 7/19/1998 -0700, you wrote: >It may be useful for you to assign the NIC's address to something other >than 0x300. A lot of different (very different even!) cards try to use >0x300 (sound cards, primarily). Theres a sound card in the machine but its sitting on 0x330 >Also you may want to

RE: Lan Tcp/ip Question

Do you have the IP-Masquerade / IP-Firewall package installed? (I forget the actual name.) I had similar problems after installing the ipmasq tools. Seems the install scripts set up a really strict rules set to protect the Linux machine from attack over the net. The rules were so strict I couldn

Re: Lan Tcp/ip Question

Hi... It may be useful for you to assign the NIC's address to something other than 0x300. A lot of different (very different even!) cards try to use 0x300 (sound cards, primarily). Also you may want to try pinging the machine's own address on the ethernet. See what that produces. Aside from that

Re: LAN configuration problem?

On Thu, 3 Jul 1997, Craig Sanders wrote: First, thanks for all your info and help... > So, this table is saying that IP address 192.168.1.3 (your win95 machine?) > is at the machine with ethernet card 00:C0:26:80:1E:73 Yes, 192.168.1.3 (horeb) is the Win95 and that is its ethernet card. >

Re: LAN configuration problem?

On Wed, 2 Jul 1997, Randy Edwards wrote: (i've deleted lots of stuff which seemed fine and didn't seem to need a response) > > can your linux machine ping the win95 machine? > >Nope, when I ping the Win95 box I get a 100% loss. > > what's in your arp table on the linux machine? try 'arp -a

Re: LAN configuration problem?

Odd, I still can't figure this one out. After reinstalling Win95 and triple checking its setup I'm thinking that the problem must be on Linux's end. Since it's been a while since I brought this issue up, I'll quote a lot (my apologies) to refresh your memory. > > /etc/init.d/network: > >

Re: LAN configuration problem?

Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Also, Randy's question was about an IP Masquerading setup. He almost > certainly doesn't want ip_forwarding turned on. Hmm. I'm not sure but I think as far as the kernel is concerned masquerading may count as a form of forwarding. All I do know is th

Re: LAN configuration problem?

On 19 Jun 1997, Rob Browning wrote: > > echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forwarding > > > > What does the 'cat >' part do? > > That's what I meant. The cat > was the result of a failure to cut and > paste properly... Also, Randy's question was about an IP Masquerading setup. He almost cert

Re: LAN configuration problem?

"Jens B. Jorgensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forwarding > > What does the 'cat >' part do? That's what I meant. The cat > was the result of a failure to cut and paste properly... Sorry about that. -- Rob -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-ma

Re: LAN configuration problem?

Rob Browning wrote: > > Also bear in mind that some kernels require a > > cat > echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forwarding > > to get forwarding working. Surely you mean: cat | echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forwarding or even simply echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forwarding What

Re: LAN configuration problem?

Also bear in mind that some kernels require a cat > echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forwarding to get forwarding working. -- Rob -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .

Re: LAN configuration problem?

On Mon, 16 Jun 1997, Randy Edwards wrote: > /etc/init.d/network: > #!/bin/sh > # Configure the loopback interface: > ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1 > route add -net 127.0.0.0 > > # Define some of my defaults: > IPADDR=192.168.1.1 > NETMASK=255.255.255.0 > NETWORK=192.168.1.0 > BROADCAST=192.168.