[PARTLY SOLVED] RE: kmail + akonadi + trouble

Found an ugly solution: 1. Deleted the mailfolder ~/.kde/share/apps/kmail/mail/ 2. Started kmail and let create the "Local Folders", which now point to ~/.kde/share/apps/kmail/ mail.directory/ and created another folder ~/.kde/share/apps/kmail/mail/ 3. Then rsync all mails from computer A int

Re: kmail + akonadi + trouble

I have been doing something somewhat similar to provide a backup for my mail server (I get mail delivered directly by SMTP to a postfix server on a home machine.) I have simply duplicated the postfix setup on the two machines, then I change the port forwarding in my router to deliver it to either

Re: kmail - mailadresse and name confused

On Wed, 2020-08-19 at 21:55 +0200, Hans wrote: > Answer myself: There is ~/.config/kmailrc, which got the known mailaddresses > with names. However, when I delete them in this file and restart kmail, the > mail addresses I sent to in the past. are not forgotten. So there is no > change > in the

Re: kmail - mailadresse and name confused

Answer myself: There is ~/.config/kmailrc, which got the known mailaddresses with names. However, when I delete them in this file and restart kmail, the mail addresses I sent to in the past. are not forgotten. So there is no change in the behavour. This led me to the conclusion, that these inf

Re: kmail - mailadresse and name confused

> In my older version of kmail (on Wheezy -- I'd expect your using a newer > version) there is a section (essentially a cache) of Recent Addresses in > /.kde/share/config/kmailrc. > > If you have the same file, if you go in and edit those addresses that should > fix the problem. Yes, I got a newe

Re: kmail - mailadresse and name confused

On Wednesday, August 19, 2020 05:58:53 AM Hans wrote: > Hi folks, > > somehow in kmail the mailadresse and the name are confused. When I want to > write a mail, by typing the mailadresse is intelligently fullfilled, but > the belonging name is not correctly added. Also on most mailadresses, I > ge

Re: kmail not reading imap folders

I tried it with Thunderbird, and it works fine, so the problem seems to be with kmail (likely akonadi).I've used kmail and kontact for years and would like to get them working with this account. I have some deadlines at work which will keep me too busy to work on it for a while, though. -Chri

Re: kmail not reading imap folders

On Wednesday 01 April 2020 00:39:56 elvis wrote: > On 31/3/20 8:16 am, Christopher Judd wrote: > > Hi, all, > > > > I have an email account (through pangia.biz ). > > When I try to set it up as an IMAP account using kmail, all of the > > folders show, but the emails only show in

Re: kmail not reading imap folders

On 31/3/20 8:16 am, Christopher Judd wrote: Hi, all, I have an email account (through pangia.biz ). When I try to set it up as an IMAP account using kmail, all of the folders show, but the emails only show in a couple of them.  In particular, the emails in the inbox do not

Re: kmail - several issues

On 2019-07-29, hans.ullr...@loop.de wrote: > Hi folks, > > in the latest version of kmail (debian/stable) I discovered several > issues. As it might be possible, they belong together, I am just > describing it here. Maybe these are already known. > > 1. It is not possible, to print an email any mo

Re: kmail and encrypted mails

On Ma, 25 dec 18, 11:52:53, Nicolas George wrote: > Katnip (2018-12-25): > > you could try using protonmail which has pgp, it's free to start with. > > The problem is not the software, changing it will not help. In this particular case it would, since ProtonMail is a webmail and app with built-i

Re: kmail - just a little problem

Op woensdag 13 februari 2019 17:25:56 CET schreef Hans: > Hi folks, > > I am running into a little problem with kmail in plasma. > > The problem is, that the column on the very left side (the one where the > folders like "kmail-folder" are shown) with the the definition "name" is > very, very bi

Re: kmail - just a little problem

On Wednesday, February 13, 2019 11:25:56 AM EST Hans wrote: > Hi folks, > > I am running into a little problem with kmail in plasma. > > The problem is, that the column on the very left side (the one where the > folders like "kmail-folder" are shown) with the the definition "name" is > very, ver

Re: kmail and encrypted mails

On Wednesday, December 26, 2018 08:45:52 AM Nicolas George wrote: > Carl (2018-12-26): > > OK, I literally own nitpicking.com and I wouldn't be making such > > a big deal about the meaning of "based on." > > You should: it is a legal matter, where words have a very minute > meaning. It would be a

Re: kmail and encrypted mails

On 2018-12-26, Carl wrote: > On 12/26/18 12:00 AM, John Hasler wrote: >> rhkramer writes: >>> Well, it could have been "based" (or inspired, or similar) based on >>> PGP even if it was newly written code. (And my guess / recollection >>> from that time is that it was so "based" / inspired / whate

Re: kmail and encrypted mails

Carl (2018-12-26): > OK, I literally own nitpicking.com and I wouldn't be making such > a big deal about the meaning of "based on." You should: it is a legal matter, where words have a very minute meaning. > Just say "When I wrote 'based > on' I meant

Re: kmail and encrypted mails

On Wednesday, December 26, 2018 07:05:02 AM Carl wrote: > On 12/26/18 12:00 AM, John Hasler wrote: > > rhkramer writes: > >> Well, it could have been "based" (or inspired, or similar) based on > >> PGP even if it was newly written code. (And my guess / recollection > >> from that time is that it w

Re: kmail and encrypted mails

On 12/26/18 12:00 AM, John Hasler wrote: rhkramer writes: Well, it could have been "based" (or inspired, or similar) based on PGP even if it was newly written code. (And my guess / recollection from that time is that it was so "based" / inspired / whatever -- very similar functionality.) It wa

Re: kmail and encrypted mails

rhkramer writes: > Well, it could have been "based" (or inspired, or similar) based on > PGP even if it was newly written code. (And my guess / recollection > from that time is that it was so "based" / inspired / whatever -- very > similar functionality.) It was inspired by PGP and designed to be

Re: kmail and encrypted mails

On 12/25/18 7:12 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: After reading thru the *available* info, starting with Wikipedia, one thing stands out, and perhaps explains your insistence that it never happened, and thats the 4+ years of total silence on the subject from its initial release in 1991, to 1996 when the a

Re: kmail and encrypted mails

On Tuesday, December 25, 2018 04:58:23 PM Nicolas George wrote: > Gene Heskett (2018-12-25): > > As for gpg not being pgp, you are likely correct, but what was gpg based > > on originally if not pgp? > > Original code. Well, it could have been "based" (or inspired, or similar) based on PGP even

Re: kmail and encrypted mails

On Tuesday 25 December 2018 16:25:58 John Hasler wrote: > Gene writes: > > [Phil Zimmermann] spent 3 years in the federal pen... > > Citation, please (not an old Amiga mailing list). After reading thru the *available* info, starting with Wikipedia, one thing stands out, and perhaps explains your

Re: kmail and encrypted mails

Gene Heskett (2018-12-25): > As for gpg not being pgp, you are likely correct, but what was gpg based > on originally if not pgp? Original code. Regards, -- Nicolas George signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: kmail and encrypted mails

Gene writes: > [Phil Zimmermann] spent 3 years in the federal pen... Citation, please (not an old Amiga mailing list). -- John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com Elmwood, WI USA

Re: kmail and encrypted mails

On Tuesday 25 December 2018 12:48:16 John Hasler wrote: > Gene writes: > > I haven't played with pgp since they jailed P.Z., and I've always > > looked at anything newer than 2.62 as possibly equipt with a back > > door of some sort, one of the unstated conditions for allowing his > > release. > >

Re: kmail and encrypted mails

tomas writes: > That corresponds to my memories of that time (including the workaround > for the export ban which involved sending books around and scanning > them at the other side of the pond). And the t-shirts with the source code printed on them to be worn while leaving the USA. -- John Has

Re: kmail and encrypted mails

On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 11:48:16AM -0600, John Hasler wrote: > Gene writes: > > I haven't played with pgp since they jailed P.Z., and I've always > > looked at anything newer than 2.62 as possibly equipt with a back door > > of some sort, one of the unstated conditions for allowing his release. >

Re: kmail and encrypted mails

Gene writes: > I haven't played with pgp since they jailed P.Z., and I've always > looked at anything newer than 2.62 as possibly equipt with a back door > of some sort, one of the unstated conditions for allowing his release. I'd like to see some evidence that Zimmermann was jailed. I was paying

Re: kmail and encrypted mails

On Tuesday 25 December 2018 05:24:13 Hans wrote: > Hi folks, > > merry christmas! > > Yesterday I stumbled over a small understanding problem. I wanted to > send an encrypted mail to a friend. Of course I got his public key. > > But when I want to create the mail, I got stuck. Problem: I have > a

Re: kmail and encrypted mails

Hans [2018-12-25 13:11:34+01] wrote: > The old key can only be changed either for enryption or for signing, > but not both. Your old key can do both if you want to. Your master key already can sign [S]. You just need create a new subkey for encryption [E] OR modify the expiration date of your exi

Re: kmail and encrypted mails

Hi Teemu, thank you for the fast and good informations. I learned, that my key is not capable to encrypt, but to sign mails. This was a long time good enough for me, as no one wanted encrypted mails from me. I also learned, that I made a mistake in 2007, when I created the keys, that I create

Re: kmail and encrypted mails

Hans [2018-12-25 11:24:13+01] wrote: > But when I want to create the mail, I got stuck. Problem: I have > activated, that all encrypted mails shall also be encrypted by my own > key, but the system says, I have no own key. > > Ok, I could create one, but in fact, I already have a key (this mail >

Re: kmail and encrypted mails

Katnip (2018-12-25): > you could try using protonmail which has pgp, it's free to start with. The problem is not the software, changing it will not help. Regards, -- Nicolas George signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: kmail and encrypted mails

Hans (2018-12-25): > IMHO kmail could use the already existent key from me, but kmail does it only > accept as a "signing key". That looks strange and is not logically in my mind. I get this from your mail: # gpg: Signature made Tue Dec 25 11:24:13 2018 CET using DSA key ID 5F093FF8 # gpg: Can't

Re: kmail and encrypted mails

Hi Nicolas, ok, thank you for the response. Important to know, that the behaviour of kmail is correct. I will inform me now, what to do. Thank you very much for the help. Your response was a great help, now I am no more stuck. Happy days and a good 2019! Best Hans

Re: kmail and encrypted mails

Hans (2018-12-25): > this is weired. You should be able to verify my key on www.cacert.org. Are you sure about what you are doing? cacert.org does not look to be related to PGP at all. > However, what can I do? What should I do? Start by not top-posting, it is not accepted on this list; if you d

Re: kmail and encrypted mails

Hi, this is weired. You should be able to verify my key on www.cacert.org. However, what can I do? What should I do? Best Hans > I get this from your mail: > > # gpg: Signature made Tue Dec 25 11:24:13 2018 CET using DSA key ID 5F093FF8 > # gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found >

Re: kmail and reportbug problem - error:141A318A:SSL routines:tls_process_ske_dhe:dh key too small

Hi Songbird, thanks for your help! It helped really! Downgrading to the former version was not possible, due to the dependencies and meanwhile missing packages in the repo. So I decided to do the second way: Installing the libssl packages from unstable, then editing /etc/ssl/openssl.cnf like

Re: kmail and reportbug problem - error:141A318A:SSL routines:tls_process_ske_dhe:dh key too small

hans.ullr...@loop.de wrote: > Hello list, > > I am runnng into a big problem since some days. It is not possible to send > any mails using kmail (receiving is working well) and > also reportbug is not working any more. I am using TLS. ... hi, likely it was libssl1.1 upgrade which made TLS

Re: Kmail - slow or no erasing of mails when deleting fast

My Debian testing version is inoperative. Can no longer connect to Gmail. Message preview box is black. A long time now. Latest upgrade is no better. Since the main and left panes of system setup is also black, problem may be kde. On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 8:59 AM Hans wrote: > Hi Marc, > thanks fo

Re: Kmail - slow or no erasing of mails when deleting fast

Hans wrote: > Hmm, I think this behaviour was ignored since a long time. I dunno, I > believe I mentioned it some years ago in the forum, too, but nothing > changed since. > > And I am not sure, if that can be fixed at all. Because: Who is to blame? > (Sorry, if "blame" might be the wrong word, m

Re: Kmail - slow or no erasing of mails when deleting fast

Hi Marc, thanks for your reply. > Well , > > Question, what version of KMail are you using (Help:About KMail)? > The version I am running here is 5.7.3, which is debian/testing and 32-bit. However, I have to tell, that I am watching this behaviour since a lng time, almost since the

Re: Kmail - slow or no erasing of mails when deleting fast

On Monday, April 23, 2018 3:07:49 AM EDT Hans wrote: > Hi folks, > I believe, that akonadi is to slow to write the changes into its database. > When erasing mails slowly, then it is fast enough. > Well , Question, what version of KMail are you using (Help:About KMail)? I'm using vers

Re: Kmail Broken?

On Sunday 18 February 2018 06:29:34 ernst doubt wrote: > David, >Thanks much for the heads-up. Do you have a bug report you could > refer me to so I can check out details? I guess in some sense I'm > quite "lucky" as I do have one instance that's continuing to function > properly (on the lapt

Re: kmail gmail integration

I second this. Under your google settings, there is a way to generate App passwords under the "Sign-in & Security" section. Use the app password instead of your normal password, and it will bypass your 2FA. On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 11:59 PM David Baron wrote: > On יום חמישי, 29 ביוני 2017 22:38:2

Re: kmail gmail integration

On יום חמישי, 29 ביוני 2017 22:38:27 IDT T. P. Van Dae wrote: > I’m trying to transition myself back to Linux (been a long time though… > sorry!) and am working on phasing myself off of Windows. Is it possible to > integrate gmail (currently using 2-step verification) with kmail? Google > says “en

Re: kmail 1.13.7 in wheezy, font problem.

On Monday 23 February 2015 04:59:50 pm Lisi Reisz wrote: > > > > > > https://www.trinitydesktop.org/ > > > > > > It is the direct descendant of KDE3. The letters KDE do not appear in > > > the name because of trademark issues with KDE4. > > > > > > Lisi > > > > Looks interesting Lisi, so much so

Re: kmail 1.13.7 in wheezy, font problem.

On Monday 23 February 2015 21:54:40 Gene Heskett wrote: > On Monday, February 23, 2015 03:57:04 PM Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Monday 23 February 2015 20:40:09 Gene Heskett wrote: > > > On Monday, February 23, 2015 01:32:07 PM Lisi Reisz wrote: > > > > On Monday 23 February 2015 13:50:24 Gene Heskett

Re: kmail 1.13.7 in wheezy, font problem.

On Monday, February 23, 2015 03:57:04 PM Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Monday 23 February 2015 20:40:09 Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Monday, February 23, 2015 01:32:07 PM Lisi Reisz wrote: > > > On Monday 23 February 2015 13:50:24 Gene Heskett wrote: > > > > Is there a solution to this short of switching to

Re: kmail 1.13.7 in wheezy, font problem.

On Monday 23 February 2015 20:40:09 Gene Heskett wrote: > On Monday, February 23, 2015 01:32:07 PM Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Monday 23 February 2015 13:50:24 Gene Heskett wrote: > > > Is there a solution to this short of switching to claws? > > > > Would it be possible for you to go back to using KM

Re: kmail 1.13.7 in wheezy, font problem.

On Monday, February 23, 2015 01:32:07 PM Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Monday 23 February 2015 13:50:24 Gene Heskett wrote: > > Is there a solution to this short of switching to claws? > > Would it be possible for you to go back to using KMail 1.9.10? I don't > know whether the emails and folders would

Re: kmail 1.13.7 in wheezy, font problem.

On Monday 23 February 2015 13:50:24 Gene Heskett wrote: > Is there a solution to this short of switching to claws? Would it be possible for you to go back to using KMail 1.9.10? I don't know whether the emails and folders would be able to be taken backwards. But you obviously used to like the

Re: KMail send function defaulting.

Am Sonntag, 3. August 2014, 23:59:15 schrieb Weaver: > Greetings all, > > I'm running SID, and lately there have been a number of KDE updates. > I find, after last night's updates that KMail's send function doesn't work > anymore. > The message I'm getting from the pop-up is: > > 'Failed to get D

Re: kmail under wheezy

On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 02:38:28 Dick Thomas wrote: > On 19/06/13 02:06, Mike McGinn wrote: > > Hi All, Is anyone using KDE and Kmail under Wheezy? How does it > > work? Is it stable enough to use or should I wait to update from > > Squeeze? > > > > Thanks, Mike > > Hi-ya, Mike > > I tried

Re: kmail under wheezy

On Wednesday 19 Jun 2013 04:06:05 Mike McGinn wrote: > Hi All, > Is anyone using KDE and Kmail under Wheezy? Probably KDE's mail client is considered stable enough to be included in the standard KDE installation from Debian Installer. Kontact as a whole may be a little buggy. Also, pleas

Re: kmail under wheezy

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 19/06/13 02:06, Mike McGinn wrote: > Hi All, > Is anyone using KDE and Kmail under Wheezy? How does it work? Is it stable > enough to use or should I wait to update from Squeeze? > > Thanks, > Mike > this is why I shouldn't type half asleep, :o)

Re: kmail under wheezy

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 19/06/13 02:06, Mike McGinn wrote: > Hi All, Is anyone using KDE and Kmail under Wheezy? How does it > work? Is it stable enough to use or should I wait to update from > Squeeze? > > Thanks, Mike > Hi-ya, Mike I tried KDE on Wheezy and other tha

Re: kmail in background?

On Wed, 01 Aug 2012 08:10:56 +0200, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote: > does anybody know, why there is already an instance aka process running > of kmail in the background, when kde is fresh started? Nope, but being Kmail and Akonadi/Nepomuk/Strigi related stuff it can be a feature to enhance the user exp

Re: kmail crashes on startup

Am Samstag, 19. Mai 2012 schrieb m...@neidorff.com: > Hello, Hi Mark! > I'm using Mepis (a debian derivative) and I'm using kmail (4.4.4) as my > e-mail client. It has been working just fine. > > Today, I fixed a couple of filter rules and moved a couple of messages > from one mailbox to anothe

Re: kmail crashes on startup

On Mon, 21 May 2012 03:27:50 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: > On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 03:59:50PM -0400, m...@neidorff.com wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm using Mepis (a debian derivative) and I'm using kmail (4.4.4) as my >> e-mail client. It has been working just fine. > > Have you tried posting you

Re: kmail crashes on startup

On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 03:59:50PM -0400, m...@neidorff.com wrote: > Hello, > > I'm using Mepis (a debian derivative) and I'm using kmail (4.4.4) as my > e-mail client. It has been working just fine. Have you tried posting your question to the MEPIS Community Forum? http://forum.mepiscommunity.

Re: kmail crashes on startup

On Sat, 19 May 2012 15:59:50 -0400, mark wrote: > I'm using Mepis (a debian derivative) and I'm using kmail (4.4.4) as my > e-mail client. It has been working just fine. Consider also posting at the Mepis forums/mailing lists or even Debian KDE mailing list. > Today, I fixed a couple of filte

Re: Kmail woes!

On 31 July 2011 09:32, Matthew Moore wrote: > On Sunday 31 July 2011 1:19:44 AM Sharon Kimble wrote: >> I've been using KDE for several years now and much prefer kmail over >> other email programs, however, the newest kmail has one glaring >> problem for me! It separates each days emails and puts

Re: Kmail woes!

On Sunday 31 July 2011 1:19:44 AM Sharon Kimble wrote: > I've been using KDE for several years now and much prefer kmail over > other email programs, however, the newest kmail has one glaring > problem for me! It separates each days emails and puts a horizontal > grey bar between the days. For me I

Re: KMail - forwarding issues

On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 15:48:30 + (UTC) Camaleón wrote: ... > with mbox and searching strings in Icedove is bit slow if mbox files are > big (measured in GiB :-P). If you're still doing on-demand searching, have you considered using a mail indexer, such as Sylph-Searcher, or a generic file in

Re: KMail - forwarding issues

On 10/30/2010 05:25 PM, Lisi wrote: [snip] I have finally understood that the rest of you want HTML functionality. I have always thought that KMail's lack of friendliness to HTML is one of its strengths. Options, Lisi, *options*. You can configure Thunderbird to (as I do) ignore html and yo

Re: KMail - forwarding issues

On 10/30/2010 10:34 AM, Paul Cartwright wrote: On Sat October 30 2010, Camaleón wrote: You can please all the people all the time by allowing the user to be able to be free of using the best e-mail format for every situation. And so it does Thunderbird/Icedove but not Kmail :-( yes, I didn't f

Re: KMail - forwarding issues

On 10/31/2010 07:19 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > I always send plain text messages. If I wanted to I could forward an > HTML message inline as Tbird has all kinds of flexibility in this > regard. But why would I want to forward HTML garbage, inline or otherwise? > > "Rich HTML" email was a neat thi

Re: KMail - forwarding issues

Lisi put forth on 10/31/2010 5:49 AM: > So here. I regard the fact that my emails are blessedly HTML and picture > free > as a strength, and a highly desirable feature. Tbird has this great feature called "View Message Body As" with 3 options, one being plain text, the other two being varying

Re: KMail - forwarding issues

On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 10:49:24 +, Lisi wrote: > On Sunday 31 October 2010 10:32:24 Camaleón wrote: >> I don't see how a "lack" (meaning, "inability of choice") can be a good >> feature ;-( > > There _is_ choice - there are loads of email clients and most of them > have inline pictures. I would

Re: KMail - forwarding issues

On Sunday 31 October 2010 10:32:24 Camaleón wrote: > I don't see how a "lack" (meaning, "inability of choice") can be a good > feature ;-( There _is_ choice - there are loads of email clients and most of them have inline pictures. But to give you an example of when a lack is a highly to be desir

Re: KMail - forwarding issues

On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 10:18:37 +, Lisi wrote: > On Sunday 31 October 2010 10:09:18 Camaleón wrote: >> If you want to keep images and html formatting of the original message, >> as soon as you reply/forward inline you lose all the "fancy" things. > > Sorry :-( I simply hadn't grasped that you

Re: KMail - forwarding issues

On Sunday 31 October 2010 10:09:18 Camaleón wrote: > If you want to keep images and html formatting of the original message, > as soon as you reply/forward inline you lose all the "fancy" things. Sorry :-( I simply hadn't grasped that you were all complaining at the fact that Kmail doesn't handl

Re: KMail - forwarding issues

On Sunday 31 October 2010 01:26:54 you wrote: > On 10/30/2010 06:25 PM, Lisi wrote: > > I have finally understood that the rest of you want HTML functionality. > > I have always thought that KMail's lack of friendliness to HTML is one of > > its strengths. > > what I want is to be able to forward

Re: KMail - forwarding issues

On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 23:14:35 +0100, Lisi wrote: > On Saturday 30 October 2010 16:05:43 Camaleón wrote: >> Kmail only allows to forward "as an attachment" the original e-mail > > That is simply not correct. You can forward as attachment, in line, as > a digest or redirect. I always use in line f

Re: KMail - forwarding issues

Paul Cartwright put forth on 10/30/2010 10:34 AM: > the question is, do I want to try to go to all the trouble of converting my > years of kmail mail, to MBOX format... You may not have to, as it can be done automatically. If you have an IMAP account somewhere simply copy all your email folder

Re: KMail - forwarding issues

On Wednesday 20 October 2010 13:12:53 Mihira Fernando wrote: > On 10/20/2010 05:16 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote: > > On Wed October 20 2010, AG wrote: > >> However, bottom line: so far this is the most viable solution to the > >> forwarding issue. I'm sorry to read that it doesn't work for you in a

Re: KMail - forwarding issues

On Wednesday 20 October 2010 10:05:43 Paul Cartwright wrote: > On Tue October 19 2010, Mike Bird wrote: > > I use KMail/Kontact in KDE 3.5 in Lenny. > > > > Does pressing "T" ("Edit Message") and changing the "To" address > > at the top come anywhere close to the functionality you need? > > no, it

Re: KMail - forwarding issues

On Saturday 30 October 2010 16:05:43 Camaleón wrote: > Kmail only allows to forward "as an attachment" the original e-mail That is simply not correct. You can forward as attachment, in line, as a digest or redirect. I always use in line for exactly the reasons you give. Lisi -- To UNSUBSCRIB

Re: KMail - forwarding issues

On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 15:48 +, Camaleón wrote: > On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 11:34:18 -0400, Paul Cartwright wrote: > > (...) > > > the question is, do I want to try to go to all the trouble of converting > > my years of kmail mail, to MBOX format... > > Yes, that's another handicap :-) > > I love

Re: KMail - forwarding issues

On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 11:34:18 -0400, Paul Cartwright wrote: (...) > the question is, do I want to try to go to all the trouble of converting > my years of kmail mail, to MBOX format... Yes, that's another handicap :-) I love "maildir" and Kmail has the ability to play fine with both formats (mb

Re: KMail - forwarding issues

On Sat October 30 2010, Camaleón wrote: > You can please all the people all the time by allowing the user to be > able to be free of using the best e-mail format for every situation. And > so it does Thunderbird/Icedove but not Kmail :-( yes, I didn't finish reading the OP's original request, I fo

Re: KMail - forwarding issues

On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 15:41:04 +0100, Lisi wrote: > On Tuesday 19 October 2010 20:55:07 Camaleón wrote: >> > Is there a trick to forwarding emails in KMail so that all that >> > happens is that the OP's email content is preserved along with any >> > attachments but that the OP's details can be edite

Re: KMail - forwarding issues

On Sat October 30 2010, Lisi wrote: > > > Is there a trick to forwarding emails in KMail so that all that happens > > > is that the OP's email content is preserved along with any attachments > > > but that the OP's details can be edited out? > > > > AFAICT, no. > > Copy and paste the email content

Re: KMail - forwarding issues

On Tuesday 19 October 2010 20:55:07 Camaleón wrote: > > Is there a trick to forwarding emails in KMail so that all that happens > > is that the OP's email content is preserved along with any attachments > > but that the OP's details can be edited out? > > AFAICT, no. Copy and paste the email conte

Re: KMail - forwarding issues

On 10/21/2010 10:37 AM, Paul Cartwright wrote: On Thu October 21 2010, Ron Johnson wrote: Just as an IMAP server centralizes email for network access, an LDAP (Lightweight Directory Access Protocol) database on your desktop machine would store all your contacts. so, I could use that instead of

Re: KMail - forwarding issues

On Thu October 21 2010, Ron Johnson wrote: > Just as an IMAP server centralizes email for network access, an LDAP > (Lightweight Directory Access Protocol) database on your desktop > machine would store all your contacts. so, I could use that instead of having separate contact lists ( and keeping

Re: KMail - forwarding issues

On 10/21/2010 07:01 AM, Paul Cartwright wrote: On Wed October 20 2010, Ron Johnson wrote: If you can get LDAP fully functional (no mean feat for a hobbyist) on your desktop then *maybe* KMail and Kontact on your laptop can see the data on your main machine. I don't use kmail on my laptop, I us

Re: KMail - forwarding issues

On Wed October 20 2010, Ron Johnson wrote: > If you can get LDAP fully functional (no mean feat for a hobbyist) > on your desktop then *maybe* KMail and Kontact on your laptop can > see the data on your main machine. I don't use kmail on my laptop, I use thunderbird. I get to my desktop from my l

Re: KMail - forwarding issues

On 10/20/2010 08:05 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote: On Wed October 20 2010, Ron Johnson wrote: I've tried evo&Sylpheed, but they all seem to croak/crash/fail at IMAP&the kontact app suite. Tbird/Icedove works fine with courier-IMAP. yes, and I'

Re: KMail - forwarding issues

On Wed October 20 2010, Ron Johnson wrote: > >                                             I've tried evo&  Sylpheed, > > but they all seem to croak/crash/fail at IMAP&  the kontact app suite. > > Tbird/Icedove works fine with courier-IMAP. yes, and I've used tbird on my laptop . > > > Is pegasus

Re: KMail - forwarding issues

On Wed October 20 2010, Ron Johnson wrote: > Run an IMAP server on your desktop?  With DynDNS, port forwarding > and IMAPs you could access your email anywhere, and from most any > machine. nomachine was quick & easy & gave me direct access to my desktop from my laptop. Right now on my desktop I

Re: KMail - forwarding issues

On 10/19/2010 05:01 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote: On Tue October 19 2010, Camaleón wrote: Icedove, of course. It allows the same features that Thunderbird. Greetings, I use thunderbird on my laptop, for when I travel.. Lately ( the last 6 weeks) I've been using nomachine on my laptop to get to m

Re: KMail - forwarding issues

On 10/19/2010 04:58 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote: On Tue October 19 2010, AG wrote: I was actually thinking of giving Sylpheed Claws (is it still called that??) a revisit since last I used it many, many moons back. I have stayed with kmail for years, through 3 different distros, because I like it

Re: KMail - forwarding issues

On Wed October 20 2010, Camaleón wrote: > Kmail is a great (the best I've ever tried) e-mail client. Is just its > html editor lacks some love and people who needs to work with html format > has to think it twice before using it :-) I totally agree. My worst frustration is trying to forward HTML e

Re: KMail - forwarding issues

On 10/20/2010 05:16 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote: On Wed October 20 2010, AG wrote: However, bottom line: so far this is the most viable solution to the forwarding issue. I'm sorry to read that it doesn't work for you in a similar way Paul. ok, I tried it again on another email that had an Encap

Re: KMail - forwarding issues

On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:31:53 -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote: > On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 19:55 +, Camaleón wrote: (...) >> There was a long (and interesing thread¹) not so much ago, where people >> asked for such functions that seem to be -still- missed. Response? >> "No". >> >> That was one

Re: KMail - forwarding issues

On Wed October 20 2010, AG wrote: > However, bottom line: so far this is the most viable solution to the > forwarding issue.  I'm sorry to read that it doesn't work for you in a > similar way Paul. ok, I tried it again on another email that had an Encapsulated message. When I hit "T" it attached

Re: KMail - forwarding issues

On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:51:25 +0100, AG wrote: > On 19/10/10 20:55, Camaleón wrote: >> On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 19:26:30 +0100, AG wrote: >> >> (...) >> >> >>> Is there a trick to forwarding emails in KMail so that all that >>> happens is that the OP's email content is preserved along with any >>> attac

Re: KMail - forwarding issues

On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:01:04 -0400, Paul Cartwright wrote: > On Tue October 19 2010, Camaleón wrote: >> Icedove, of course. It allows the same features that Thunderbird. >> > > I use thunderbird on my laptop, for when I travel.. Lately ( the last 6 > weeks) I've been using nomachine on my laptop

  1   2   3   >