-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/21/08 17:10, Henry Luciano wrote:
[snip]
>
> Out of curiosity, why hang onto an old Pentium when you can pick up an
> old Athlon or P3 for probably nothing? Aside from not dumping yet
> another system into the waste stream that is.
Maybe(?) be
Henry,
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, Henry Luciano wrote:
> Out of curiosity, why hang onto an old Pentium when you can pick up an old
> Athlon or P3 for probably nothing? Aside from not dumping yet another system
> into the waste stream that is.
Because this computer was long ago paid for and there
Account for Debian group mail wrote:
My question is, on the upgrade should I install the kernel-image-2.6-386
or the kernel-image-2.6-686? I see no 586tsc.
Wow, this brings back memories (COAST modules anyone?) IIRC the 686 image will
barf on your Pentium MMX as the Pentium Pro instruction set
On Monday 21 July 2008 22:49, Account for Debian group mail wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We're in the process of upgrading some old computers from sarge to etch.
>
> On one computer (used only as a firewall) it has:
>
> Intel Pentium with F0 0F bug - workaround enabled.
> CPU: Intel Pentium MMX stepping 03
> Intel Pentium with F0 0F bug - workaround enabled.
> CPU: Intel Pentium MMX stepping 03
>
> Anyway the kernel it is running is:
>
> vmlinuz-2.4.27-4-586tsc for the Pentium-Classic.
>
> My question is, on the upgrade should I install the kernel-image-2.6-386
> or the kernel-image-2.6-686? I see no
5 matches
Mail list logo
