There are a lot of docs about that.
Take a look a the kernel How-to
(http://www.linuxdocs.org/HOWTOs/Kernel-HOWTO.html)
FYI, 2.4 kernels already has modules, modules.conf... in /etc...
Aurélien
PS: 2.2 too, by the way ;)
Paras pradhan wrote:
hi:
I am running Debian Sarge. under /etc/ i s
Aaron Brashears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would also think it would be cool to have
> the kernel source package ship with the 'debian official config' saved
> off in an external configuration file so that I could rebuild
> *everything* that ships in the kernel ima
The kernel that comes with Debian potato is configured
with APM=y. Because i want my desktop computer to
power down automatically with the halt command, it was just
a matter of adding: append="apm=on" to my lilo.conf
Then if your m.b. supports APM it powers down. Just a
convenient
>>"Aaron" == Aaron Brashears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Aaron> I would also think it would be cool to have the kernel source
Aaron> package ship with the 'debian official config' saved off in an
Aaron> external configuration file so that I could rebuild
Aaron> *everything* that ships in the k
On Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 09:39:35PM -0700, Aaron Brashears wrote:
> I have a few basic questions about building the kernel from source for
> debian. I've read the documentation, but there are a few things that
> are unclear to me.
>
> Why is the kernel-image-* package compiled with APM turned off?
Aaron Brashears wrote:
>
> I have a few basic questions about building the kernel from source for
> debian. I've read the documentation, but there are a few things that are
> unclear to me.
>
> Why is the kernel-image-* package compiled with APM turned off? Almost
> any computer bios made in the
Hi,
>>"Remo" == Remo Badii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Remo> Why does the original kernel have permissions -rwxr-xr-x, while
Remo> the new one (vmlinuz-2.0.34) has -rw-r--r--?
The kernel does not need to be executable. Since the file
system is a kernel module, and the file system and t
7 matches
Mail list logo
