On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 00:29:49 -0400 (EDT), Frank Miles wrote:
>
> Thanks to everyone who helped - yes, it was indeed something about
> my environment. In /etc/profile, I've long exported an environment
> variable of the form:
>
> export LIBRARY_PATH="/home/myname/devel/lib:."
>
> I have a
Thanks to everyone who helped - yes, it was indeed something about
my environment. In /etc/profile, I've long exported an environment
variable of the form:
export LIBRARY_PATH="/home/myname/devel/lib:."
I have a dim memory that when compiling cross-compilers that the
'.' directory is a
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 13:35:00 -0400 (EDT), Frank Miles wrote:
> Stephen wrote:
>> ...
>> I'm guessing that elks-libc is what is needed. Is that package installed
>> on your system?
>> ...
>
> No, it's not installed. Sure seems strange, requiring a 16-bit library
> for the build of a 64-bit system
Thanks to Stan, Stephen, and Maderios!
-
Stan wrote:
Do you get the same error using the (new) Debian kernel method?
$ make KDEB_PKGVERSION=custom.1.0 deb-pkg
I'll have to learn more about the new method for the future.
For right now, unfortunately the answer is yes, I get the same e
$ uname -a
Linux debian 2.6.39.1 #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Jun 7 01:40:05 CEST 2011 x86_64
GNU/Linux
is a self-build (rt patch emu kernel) with source from kernel.org and at
least 2.6.39-2 from the repositories was ok too, didn't tested the
upgrade to 2.6.39-3 until now, which btw. still is named 2.6.39-
On 07/16/2011 08:19 PM, Frank Miles wrote:
I just tried compiling the kernel for My 'wheezy' system (2.6.39) [amd64].
As I've done many times - using
make-kpkg --revision N kernel_image
Hi
For my part:
make-kpkg kernel_image --initrd
and it works.
greetings
Maderios
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
On 7/16/2011 1:19 PM, Frank Miles wrote:
> I just tried compiling the kernel for My 'wheezy' system (2.6.39) [amd64].
> As I've done many times - using
> make-kpkg --revision N kernel_image
> But with the recent linux-source update - shortly after starting I get:
Do you get the same error usin
On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 14:19:17 -0400 (EDT), Frank Miles wrote:
>
> I just tried compiling the kernel for My 'wheezy' system (2.6.39) [amd64].
> As I've done many times - using
> make-kpkg --revision N kernel_image
> But with the recent linux-source update - shortly after starting I get:
>
>
that worked, strange, did some stuff change in the config file?
-JSS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jule
The /usr/include/version.h in general does not match
the /usr/src/linux/include/linux/version.h which will be created during a
kernel configureation
Try
# make mrproper
before
# make bzImage
MarvS
O
Jule
The /usr/include/version.h in general does not match
the /usr/src/linux/include/linux/version.h which will be created during a
kernel configureation
Try
# make mrproper
before
# make bzImage
MarvS
Original Message:
-
From: Jule Slootbeek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 22 Oct
> I had this, but no Modules (like I siad before). I tried to Compile
> 2.4.22 from kernel.org and get now the same Errors.
> It's confusing, I remove the directory, decompress it again, do an
> make oldconfig && make dep && make and get the same Error on another
> file. The Error is sometimes h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Mittwoch, 17. September 2003 17:00 schrieb Florian Sukup:
> Is that what you mean? It's y at my configuration. But it does
> compile correctly. Any other ideas?
I had this, but no Modules (like I siad before). I tried to Compile
2.4.22 from kerne
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 04:44:57PM +0200, Werner Mahr wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am Dienstag, 16. September 2003 16:13 schrieb Florian Sukup:
> > What do you mean with 'Kernelconfig'? Is it
> > /usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.20/.config? Or a tool which I don't
> > kno
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Dienstag, 16. September 2003 16:13 schrieb Florian Sukup:
> What do you mean with 'Kernelconfig'? Is it
> /usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.20/.config? Or a tool which I don't
> know?
I mean .config, sorry.
- --
MfG usw
Werner Mahr
GPG-Key-ID 9CCBC2B0
R
Thank you for your reply.
>
> I had the same Problem when I tried to compile my Kernel. I had in
> Kernelconfig no Modules configured, moduleloader was included (nvidia
> etc.). 2 Minutes before I got your Mail I tried it with Modules and
> it worked. I don't know if this was the Error but its
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Dienstag, 16. September 2003 14:16 schrieb Florian Sukup:
[Many things with many output]
I had the same Problem when I tried to compile my Kernel. I had in
Kernelconfig no Modules configured, moduleloader was included (nvidia
etc.). 2 Minutes be
On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 17:15:13 +0200
"Esben Laursen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
[ past traffic trimmed ]
>
> The funny part is that if I do a "make dep && make && make modules"
> there is no error message and it compile correct. why is that?
Read your original error messages again. You'r
On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 17:15:13 +0200
"Esben Laursen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please trim replies.
> The funny part is that if I do a "make dep && make && make modules" there
> is no error message and it compile correct. why is that?
>
> Could it be possible that I are missing some kind of lib t
On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 13:39:35 +0200
"JZidar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Isn't the correct syntax something like:
> make-kpkg --append-to-version=.something kernel_image (note the = and .)?
The period isn't required; I used it to separate the kernel version from the
rest of the append-to-version
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Metzler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Esben Laursen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: Kernel compile error with make-kpkg
> On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 13:08:39
On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 13:08:39 +0200
"Esben Laursen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "Chris Metzler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 23:50:06 +0200
> >"Esben Laursen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Here is the error I get:
>>>
>>> cd /usr/src/linux/debian/tmp-image/lib/modules/2.4
- Original Message -
From: "Esben Laursen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 1:08 PM
Subject: Re: Kernel compile error with make-kpkg
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Metzler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Metzler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Esben Laursen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 12:43 AM
Subject: Re: Kernel compile error with make-kpkg
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2003
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 23:50:06 +0200
"Esben Laursen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When I try to compile a 2.4.21 kernel with Debians make-kpkg tool, I get
> this error no matter what I try!! The command im useing is: make-kpkg
> --append_to_version -test kernel-image
>
> I think it's when the pack
I was trying to compile a 2.4.18 kernel source that
comes with the cds of DEBIAN .. so, I wasn't get to
compile it without SMP support (since this can't be
enabled to insert some modules, like ptserial.o to
makes my HSPPCtel modem works..).
So, last night I got the 2.4.18 kernel source from
[I'm on-list, obviously, so please don't CC me. Also, please let your
editor do some sort of sensible wrapping (say at 72 columns), since your
messages just look horrific.]
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 01:39:38PM -0300, Rodrigo F. Baroni wrote:
> --- Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > On Sun,
>
--- Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > On Sun,
Jan 05, 2003 at 03:36:36PM -0300, Rodrigo F.
> Baroni wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Kernel 2.4.18 in a 233Mhz PC Pentium 233Mhz,
> > LMR591 mother board (everything on-board) - after
> > compile the kernel (#make bzImage) the follow
> error
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 03:36:36PM -0300, Rodrigo F. Baroni wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Kernel 2.4.18 in a 233Mhz PC Pentium 233Mhz,
> LMR591 mother board (everything on-board) - after
> compile the kernel (#make bzImage) the follow error
> appear:
>
>
> "make: warning: Clock skew detected
Rodrigo F. Baroni said:
> /usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.18/include/linux/kernel_stat.h:48:
> `smp_num_cpus' undeclared (first use in this function)
A guess for a workaround would be to check to see if SMP is enabled
in the config, if it is, turn it off. If it is not, turn it on, and see
if that help
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 08:53:44AM -0800, Christopher S. Swingley wrote:
[snip]
> It looks like the problem is the 'ld' step, where it uses '-oformat binary'
> instead of '--oformat binary'. I edited the Makefile in
> /usr/src/linux/arch/i386/boot, and it worked. Is this a bug with the
> 2.4.1 k
Eric R Cheney wrote:
>
> Just want to follow-up and say thanks. The follow up because there were a
> couple of hypotheses about what could go wrong. Jeremy Nickurak's
> hypothesis did the trickso people compiling kernel's under unstable
> take note.
Maybe we would if the replies would've be
Just want to follow-up and say thanks. The follow up because there were a
couple of hypotheses about what could go wrong. Jeremy Nickurak's
hypothesis did the trickso people compiling kernel's under unstable
take note.
Thanks Jeremy for your help...I would never have guessed...thanks
-E
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> > OK, then when I go to copy the bzImage file to /boot/, it's not there. In
> > fact, I the reran bzImage step and in fact it cuts out with an error
> > messageI doesn't compile the source codeAnybody know what I'm doing
> > wrong? I am migrating from RedHa
> OK, then when I go to copy the bzImage file to /boot/, it's not there. In
> fact, I the reran bzImage step and in fact it cuts out with an error
> messageI doesn't compile the source codeAnybody know what I'm doing
> wrong? I am migrating from RedHat and maybe I'm assuming things I
>
In linux/arch/i386/boot/Makefile, all the "-oformat" occurances need to be
changed to "--oformat".
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001 19:11:18 Eric R Cheney wrote:
> OK, then when I go to copy the bzImage file to /boot/, it's not there. In
> fact, I the reran bzImage step and in fact it cuts out with an error
>
Quoting Blair Haukedal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I cannot compile the Debian 2.2.17 kernel. I get the following:
>
> peewee:kernel-source-2.2.17:(root)73$ make config
> rm -f include/asm
> ( cd
> include ; ln -sf asm-i386 asm)
> /bin/sh: cd: include: No such file or
> directory
> mkdir: cannot crea
Looks like you might need the bin86 package. (The assembler for x86
machines...)
Just a guess... I'm not a C guru by a long shot.
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 09:53:17PM -0600, Blair Haukedal wrote:
> I cannot compile the Debian 2.2.17 kernel. I get the following:
>
> peewee:kernel-source-2.2.17:(
there is more to this error then just the below, please include the full
output, include the previous, 35 lines if possible. chances are it is
something you enabled but is broken, to find out what it is i need the
full output. also what version of gcc are you using ?
to output make to a logfile:
Russel wrote:
>Oops...I've got either a 2.2.10, 2.2.12, and 2.2.14. Tried em all.
>
>I've got the binutils and gcc versions required in Documentation/Changes
>( I even checked using the commands listed in that file)
>
>If the file builds just fine on your computer...has the file changed
>between
Oops...I've got either a 2.2.10, 2.2.12, and 2.2.14. Tried em all.
I've got the binutils and gcc versions required in Documentation/Changes
( I even checked using the commands listed in that file)
If the file builds just fine on your computer...has the file changed
between kernel versions? Has
Russell wrote:
>Here's the message I get:
>
>Assembler Messages:
>Bindec.S :487
>/usr/src/linux/arch/m68k/fpsp040
>[Bindec.o] error 1
>value of -512 too large for field of 1 bytes at 511
>
>I asked the people on the m68k list, and they didn't know. I am sure I'm
>missing some vital library or othe
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Paul wrote:
Have you installed libc6-dev and libncurses4-dev (this one only for make
menuconfig) ?
bye!
> (Not sure if this made it the first time)
> Back Again!
>2 distinct problems this time, firstly I seem to have been
> taken off the list (so please copy to t
try the package : kernel-package
it makes all automaticaly.
else : perhaps you need the package bin86
Hi,
The command as86 is not found so
the directory of as86 is not in your PATH (I don't think so)
or (probably) the package bin86 is not installed on your system
Alexandre Devaure
--
De :mel[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date d'envoi : mercredi 5 mai 1999 12:39
A : debian-user@lists.deb
On Wed, May 05, 1999 at 10:39:44AM +, mel wrote:
> hi,
> Trying to compile sound support into a kernel (2.0.36), i am getting the
> following error messages:
> after `make zImage`
> make[1] as86 command not found
> make [1] ***[bootsect.o] Error 127
> make[1] Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux/a
Gregory T. Norris wrote:
>
> Try running "dpkg -l|grep gcc", and make sure that you have gcc installed
> instead of/in addition to egcc. If memory serves, there are problems
> related to compiling the 2.0.x kernels with egcc, and so they have
> #error directives set up in order to disallow it.
>
On Sat, Mar 27, 1999 at 08:08:44PM -0800, Mark Wagnon wrote:
> Hi all-
>
> I was trying to compile the 2.0.36 kernel on my slink system to include
> support for sound.
>
> I went through the make xconfig deal and typed make dep and make clean
> without incident. However when I tried to make zImag
On Mon, 30 Jun 1997 23:27:30 EDT dpk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[stuff about SIGSEGV w/compiling kernel]
> I have gotten this once before. I just did a 'make clean; make dep; make
> zImage' and it compiled okay... as to why this happens I don't know.
These kinds of unreproducible errors when c
I have gotten this once before. I just did a 'make clean; make dep; make
zImage' and it compiled okay... as to why this happens I don't know.
Dennis
On Mon, 30 Jun 1997, Kevin J Poorman wrote:
> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1997 22:09:44 CDT
> From: Kevin J Poorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-user@li
49 matches
Mail list logo
