Bob McGowan wrote:
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 12:09:49PM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
why do you use "/boot/boot/grub/" and not the default "/boot/grub/"?
what is in /boot/grub/menu.lst vs /boot/boot/grub/menu.lst ?
Using /boot/boot/grub is necessary when /boot is its own f
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 01:03:07PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 06:36:38PM +0100, Håkon Alstadheim wrote:
> > Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 12:09:49PM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > >
> > >> why do you use "/boot/boot/grub/" and not the defau
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 10:08:25AM -0800, Bob McGowan wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 12:09:49PM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> >>why do you use "/boot/boot/grub/" and not the default "/boot/grub/"?
> >>what is in /boot/grub/menu.lst vs /boot/boot/grub/menu.lst ?
> >>
> >U
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 12:09:49PM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
why do you use "/boot/boot/grub/" and not the default "/boot/grub/"?
what is in /boot/grub/menu.lst vs /boot/boot/grub/menu.lst ?
Using /boot/boot/grub is necessary when /boot is its own filesystem.
Regards,
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 06:36:38PM +0100, Håkon Alstadheim wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 12:09:49PM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> >
> >> why do you use "/boot/boot/grub/" and not the default "/boot/grub/"?
> >> what is in /boot/grub/menu.lst vs /boot/boot/grub/menu.
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 12:09:49PM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
>
>> why do you use "/boot/boot/grub/" and not the default "/boot/grub/"?
>> what is in /boot/grub/menu.lst vs /boot/boot/grub/menu.lst ?
>>
>>
> Using /boot/boot/grub is necessary when /boot is its own
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 12:09:49PM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
>
> why do you use "/boot/boot/grub/" and not the default "/boot/grub/"?
> what is in /boot/grub/menu.lst vs /boot/boot/grub/menu.lst ?
>
Using /boot/boot/grub is necessary when /boot is its own filesystem.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Rober
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 09:54:14AM +, Graham Smith wrote:
> I tried to do an update this morning and ran into the problem below when
> it came to installing the kernel. I've looked in
> /boot/boot/grub/menu.lst and the new kernel 2.6.18-4 hasn't
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 11:26:00PM +0200, Vegard|drageV wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> I'm experimenting with the linux kernels, and have so far tried to
> kernels available through apt-get, namely 2.4.27-1-386 (standard with
> the installation in sarge) and 2.6.8-2-686 (running today).
>
> Is there an
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 04:31:34PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
> on Thu, 12 Jun 2003 12:17:25PM -0500, Andrew A. Raines insinuated:
> > Nori Heikkinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > now, upon restarting, i can't boot in without a rescue disk!
> > > before lilo even shows up, i get a screen
on Thu, 12 Jun 2003 12:17:25PM -0500, Andrew A. Raines insinuated:
> Nori Heikkinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > now, upon restarting, i can't boot in without a rescue disk!
> > before lilo even shows up, i get a screen of cascading 0 1 0 1
> > 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1s that just g
Nori Heikkinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> now, upon restarting, i can't boot in without a rescue disk!
> before lilo even shows up, i get a screen of cascading 0 1 0 1
> 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1s that just go on forever.
Boot with that rescue disk and mount your system under /mnt.
T
Nori Heikkinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In my ongoing quest to put Debian on this Dell Inspiron 8000, I
> recompiled the kernel and disabled framebuffer support (so the screen
> doesn't go all wacky). I hadn't seen some of the options presented me
> by the install menu when i did dpkg -i ker
On Fri, 2002-06-21 at 17:40, curtis wrote:
> I just compiled and installed a kernel and then after it made changes to
> lilo.conf, I typed lilo and got the following error:
>
> Warning: Int 0x13 function 8 0x48 returned different head/sector
> geometries for BIOS drive 0x80
>
> Doing a Google s
I have found this in the past when I have installed the standard system with
modules etc and then recompiled the kernel with these modules in them, or
recompiled with the modules disabled in the kernel.
On reboot it tries to load the modules and cannot.
Try using modconf to remove the unwanted mo
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 09:13:05PM +0200, Robert Voigt wrote:
> On Thursday 28 June 2001 20:46, Joost Kooij wrote:
> > Can you think of anything unusual in your configuration? Maybe your
> > version of kernel-package doesn't know how to deal with it.
>
> Good idea. I have kernel-package 7.20 from
On Thursday 28 June 2001 20:46, Joost Kooij wrote:
> Can you think of anything unusual in your configuration? Maybe your
> version of kernel-package doesn't know how to deal with it.
Good idea. I have kernel-package 7.20 from Progeny, a leftover from when I
upgraded a bunch of packages from a Pr
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 07:11:58PM +0200, Robert Voigt wrote:
> # dpkg -i kernel-image-2.4.5_custom-2.4.5-1_i386.deb
> Selecting previously deselected package kernel-image-2.4.5.
> (Reading database ... 37091 files and directories currently installed.)
> Unpacking kernel-image-2.4.5 (from
> kernel
Bruce Elliott wrote:
> Do I need to add kerneld manually to my init sequence? Shouldn't installing
> a kernel package that has that option automatically add it to one of the rc
> files? Just wondering if that should be a 'bug' or it's expected.
kerneld in 2.2 is built into the kernel itself. no
debs,
i figured it out--(since i dual boot with loadlin, i
shouldn't have been focusing on lilo. i realized the
directory from where my old 2.0.36 kernel was booting
and copied the new kernel there). oh, well...
later.
bt.
//
cls--colo spgs wrote:
>
> debs,
>
> wanting to fully migrate
On Tue, 3 Mar 1998, Scott Walker wrote:
> Ok, this is a BIG nasty weird problem.
> I'm runnig Debian With default Kernel 2.0.29
So we're in bo, I take it.
> I grabbed Kernel 2.0.33 from ftp.kernel.org
> and did the following steps:
> tar zpfxv linux_2.0.33.tar.gz
> cd linux
> make mrproper
> mak
I found Dale Scheetz book helpful pg. 159-171 go over the traditional
linux way of compiling a custom kernel vs. the Debian way.
I got mine from www.linuxpress.com but you might find one in your local
bookstore "The Debian Linux User's Guide"
I'd have been pretty lost without it. Oh yeah, I don
My bad. Sorry for the misinformation then. I am new to
Debian... used
to old school Slackware.
Although it says it will break compilations... it seemed to work fine
for the most part. But from now on, I will not do it.
Carroll Kong
On Wed, 4 Mar 1998, Scott Ellis wrote:
> O
On Wed, 4 Mar 1998, Carroll Kong wrote:
> > tar zpfxv linux_2.0.33.tar.gz
>
> technically you forgot..
>
> cd /usr/include
> rm -rf asm linux scsi
> ln -s /usr/src/linux/include/asm-386 asm
> ln -s /usr/src/linux/include/linux linux
> ln -s /usr/src/linux/include/scsi scsi
NO, DON'T DO THIS.
Carroll Kong
> tar zpfxv linux_2.0.33.tar.gz
technically you forgot..
cd /usr/include
rm -rf asm linux scsi
ln -s /usr/src/linux/include/asm-386 asm
ln -s /usr/src/linux/include/linux linux
ln -s /usr/src/linux/include/scsi scsi
> cd linux
> make mrproper
> make menuconfig
> make dep
> make
Sounds like maybe you didn't redo your links for vmlinuz in / and didn't
edit lilo.conf (if you want to still have your old kernel available in
emergencys).
Henry Hollenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECT
Hi,
There is not enough information to make a judgement. Please
provide the following:
% ls -asCF /lib/modules
% ls -als /
% ls -asCF /boot
BTW, on Debian, kernel-package offers a simple, convenient way
of upgrading and maintianing severl different versions of the kernel
on you
Install make-kpkg.
After make menuconfig
make-kpkg --revision kernel_image
Install the new kernel with dpkg.
Chuck
On Tue, 3 Mar 1998, Scott Walker wrote:
> Ok, this is a BIG nasty weird problem.
> I'm runnig Debian With default Kernel 2.0.29
> I grabbed Kernel 2.0.33 from ftp.kernel.org
> an
28 matches
Mail list logo
