Re: Kernel 2.6.3 again

2004-02-29 Thread Kai Schindelka
Pigeon wrote: * Is it sufficient, or did I miss something? I would add to Andreas's list: libsysfs and sysfsutils. These were mentioned in a thread Google found for me on lkml, along with procps, as being update candidates for getting rid of the error message "Unknown HZ value! (xx) Assuming 100."

Re: Kernel 2.6.3 again

2004-02-29 Thread Kai Schindelka
Hello Andreas; Kai Schindelka (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: Ok. My name's not Wes, but I've got some questions anyway. :) Please start your own thread next time instead of answering a message in an existing thread. my apology. I thought it would be the best to keep the topics together, but I have

Re: Kernel 2.6.3 again (was: where to post question about compiling kernel)

2004-02-26 Thread Andreas Janssen
Hello Kai Schindelka (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: > Ok. My name's not Wes, but I've got some questions anyway. :) Please start your own thread next time instead of answering a message in an existing thread. > Debian stable, using this source: > > # Kernel 2.6 > deb http://www.backports.org/deb

Re: Kernel 2.6.3 again (was: where to post question about compiling kernel)

2004-02-26 Thread Pigeon
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 09:46:58PM +0100, Kai Schindelka wrote: > * Is it sufficient, or did I miss something? I would add to Andreas's list: libsysfs and sysfsutils. These were mentioned in a thread Google found for me on lkml, along with procps, as being update candidates for getting rid of the