Am Don, 2003-12-25 um 21.20 schrieb GCS:
[...]
For list-reference:
The problems with cryptoloop disappeared when i applied the -mm2 patch.
No more oopses or corruption AFAICT.
> Sorry, I meant 2.4.23, this bug is fixed there. Also, it's easy to
> 'backport' to earlier kernels, it adds two line
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 11:24:16AM +0100, Matthias Hentges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ugh. So loopback is known to have problems in 2.6.0. I didn't know that,
> thanks for the info.
NP. It knows to have a lot of problems. :-(
> > Sure, but that's an encryted one.
>
> Well i didn't dare to mes
Am Son, 2003-12-21 um 14.45 schrieb GCS:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 11:18:04AM +0100, Matthias Hentges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm currently running a heavily patched 2.4.22 kernel on my P4 system.
> > Since upgrading to 2.4.23 would be a lot of work due to all the patches
> > required to get
Hello Rob,
thanks for your reply.
Am Son, 2003-12-21 um 09.41 schrieb Rob Weir:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 11:18:04AM +0100, Matthias Hentges said
> > Hello list!
> >
> > I'm currently running a heavily patched 2.4.22 kernel on my P4 system.
> > Since upgrading to 2.4.23 would be a lot of work du
On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 11:18:04AM +0100, Matthias Hentges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm currently running a heavily patched 2.4.22 kernel on my P4 system.
> Since upgrading to 2.4.23 would be a lot of work due to all the patches
> required to get my hardware working, i thought i would give 2.6.
On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 11:18:04AM +0100, Matthias Hentges said
> Hello list!
>
> I'm currently running a heavily patched 2.4.22 kernel on my P4 system.
> Since upgrading to 2.4.23 would be a lot of work due to all the patches
> required to get my hardware working, i thought i would give 2.6.0-fin
6 matches
Mail list logo
