Re: Kernel 2.5.44

2003-06-29 Thread Lord Khaos
I recently asked my local Debian guru the exact same question and this was his reply: "Don't use 2.5 yet. I looked at it a few months ago when they said it was useful for normal users and it still was quite incomplete, so I didn't trust it. If you know you need it, use it, if you don't know, sta

Re: Kernel 2.5.44

2003-06-29 Thread Mark L. Kahnt
On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 01:39, Oki DZ wrote: > Hi, > > Are there any issues I should aware of in installing the Kernel version > 2.5.44 on Sid? Would there any problem with modutils? > > TIA, > Oki Well, it is a substantively old development kernel that has been largely superseded by later develop

Re: Kernel 2.5.44

2003-06-29 Thread aradorlinux
On 27 Jun 2003 12:39:05 +0700 Oki DZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Are there any issues I should aware of in installing the Kernel version > 2.5.44 on Sid? Would there any problem with modutils? You should be aware that 2.5 is a development kernel, you should update to the latest, 2.5.73

Re: Kernel 2.5.44

2003-06-29 Thread Nathan Poznick
Thus spake Oki DZ: > Hi, > > Are there any issues I should aware of in installing the Kernel version > 2.5.44 on Sid? Would there any problem with modutils? You really might want to consider using a more recent version, the current development kernel is 2.5.73 As far as modules, you'll need to i