On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 07:22:46AM +0100, Erik van der Meulen wrote:
>
> I have a Linux 2.2 (upgraded from 2.1 apart from the kernel) box that
i assume you mean `Debian' and not `Linux' Linux is just a kernel,
GNU/Linux is the operating system, Debian is the distribution. i
assume you now have
> -Original Message-
> From: Nathan E Norman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I "grew up" with Slackware too; I find the ability to put the
> kernel and
> its associated modules in a deb file, but then I use one machine to
> compile kernels for the various machines we have, since it's much
> fa
On Mon, 30 Nov 1998, Steve Lamb wrote:
: On Mon, Nov 30, 1998 at 12:43:32PM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote:
: > : We'll find out shortly. I'm FTPing the sources from sunsite.
Never did
: > : like the Debian way of doing the Kernel.
:
: > Why not?
:
: Because I was a Slackware p
On Mon, Nov 30, 1998 at 03:40:49PM -0700, Gary L. Hennigan wrote:
> The short of it is, learn to use make-kpkg. It'll make life a LOT
> easier on your new Debian system.
It's also a lot easier to compile kernels for other systems with it.
I have some 486 systems for which I prefer to build on fast
On Mon, Nov 30, 1998 at 01:28:50PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Because I was a Slackware person before I was a Debian person. I don't
> like how the headers are split from the code. I've never cared to learn the
> "Debian way" when "make dep ; make clean ; make zlilo ; shutdown -r now"
> works
On Mon, Nov 30, 1998 at 03:40:49PM -0700, Gary L. Hennigan wrote:
> The "make zlilo" approach is problematic if you have something else
> that depends on a specific kernel version (Read the file
> /usr/doc/kernel-package/Rationale.gz for 11 or so reasons you want to
> use make-kpkg).
All of wh
Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Nov 30, 1998 at 12:43:32PM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote:
| > : We'll find out shortly. I'm FTPing the sources from
| > sunsite. Never did
| > : like the Debian way of doing the Kernel.
|
| > Why not?
|
| Because I was a Slackware person b
On Mon, Nov 30, 1998 at 12:43:32PM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> : We'll find out shortly. I'm FTPing the sources from sunsite. Never
> did
> : like the Debian way of doing the Kernel.
> Why not?
Because I was a Slackware person before I was a Debian person. I don't
like how the h
On Sun, 29 Nov 1998, Steve Lamb wrote:
: On Sun, Nov 29, 1998 at 10:22:24AM +0100, Egon Schmid wrote:
: > Oh sorry, I have never tried to build a kernel the Debian way. So I have
: > to symlink the header files according the README. Could it be that there
: > is something wrong?
:
: We'
Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| [1 ]
| On Mon, Nov 30, 1998 at 01:39:25PM +1100, Richard Lyon wrote:
| > > We'll find out shortly. I'm FTPing the sources from sunsite. Never
| > > did like the Debian way of doing the Kernel.
| > >
|
| > GULP This seems a bit drastic, "make zlilo
On Mon, Nov 30, 1998 at 01:39:25PM +1100, Richard Lyon wrote:
> > We'll find out shortly. I'm FTPing the sources from sunsite. Never
> > did like the Debian way of doing the Kernel.
> >
> GULP This seems a bit drastic, "make zlilo" works for me with 2.0.34.
> It almost seems like you ha
> We'll find out shortly. I'm FTPing the sources from sunsite. Never did
> like the Debian way of doing the Kernel.
>
GULP This seems a bit drastic, "make zlilo" works for me with 2.0.34. It
almost seems like you have not installed all the right development bits. Have
you got a copy o
On Sun, Nov 29, 1998 at 10:22:24AM +0100, Egon Schmid wrote:
> Oh sorry, I have never tried to build a kernel the Debian way. So I have
> to symlink the header files according the README. Could it be that there
> is something wrong?
We'll find out shortly. I'm FTPing the sources from sunsite.
Oh sorry, I have never tried to build a kernel the Debian way. So I have
to symlink the header files according the README. Could it be that there
is something wrong?
-Egon
On Sun, 29 Nov 1998, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 1998 at 10:02:00AM +0100, Egon Schmid wrote:
> > Install the kernel
On Sun, Nov 29, 1998 at 10:02:00AM +0100, Egon Schmid wrote:
> Install the kernel header files.
I hate to say it, but I am not that stupid. Neither is dselect.
*** Opt develkernel-heade 2.0.34-42.0.34-4Header files related
*** Opt develkernel-sourc 2.0.34-42.0.34-4L
Install the kernel header files.
-Egon
On Sun, 29 Nov 1998, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Anyone else get this when doing a make zlilo with 2.0.34?
>
> ld -m elf_i386 -Ttext 0x1000 -e startup_32 -o vmlinux head.o misc.o piggy.o
> make[2]: Leaving directory
> /usr/src/kernel-source-2.0.34/arch/i386/b
> 3com cyclone has been reported to work with kernel 2.0.35. But I
> am stuck until AIC7890 will be supported in 2.0.x ?
>
> Does this mean I am locked ? Anyone has a tip or suggestion ?
Both support for aic7890 and ethernet are drivers; you can download the updates
for aic7890/3com 3c590b you
>
> Hi,
> I run an ASUS P2B-LS motherboard with AIC 7890 SCSI , so I had
> to install a special kernel image (2.0.34) from ~doko/aic7xxx.
>
> But I have also a 3com cyclone card (3C905B) which doesn't work.
> I recompiled 3c59x.c with kernel-sources-2.0.34, but it still gives
> "ff:ff:ff:ff:f
On Mon, 15 Jun 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What is the significance of packages being in Incoming?
> Is it safe to d/l and use them from there, or do things in Incoming have
> further processing to undergo before being ready for use?
If I have it straight:
New packages are uploaded to /incom
What is the significance of packages being in Incoming?
Is it safe to d/l and use them from there, or do things in Incoming have
further processing to undergo before being ready for use?
Thanks,
Timothy
On 15-Jun-98 Bob Nielsen wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jun 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Do
On Mon, 15 Jun 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Does anyone know when the .deb package for the 2.0.34 kernel source
> will be available? Will it be soon, or should I go ahead use a tgz? (What are
> the disadvantages of this as opposed to using the .deb file?)
There's a kernel source packag
21 matches
Mail list logo
