Many thanks to David, NN_il_Confusion and martin for their suggestions,
in particular..
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 08:24:09PM -0700, David Witbrodt wrote:
> The book is great, but already a bit out of date.
> Krafft has a website (not recently updated) which
> includes error corrections and new info
also sprach Digby Tarvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.04.14.0252 +0200]:
> The example in my Martin Kraft book refers to:
> apt-get install kernel-source-2.6.8
> but I can't find a 'kernel-source-anything'..
Try linux-source-*. The kernel packaging has changed substantially
since my book was pu
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:52:41AM +, Digby Tarvin wrote:
> Can anyone shed any light on the differences between the
> various kernel source packages in the repository,
kernel-source-* are for sarge and below
linux-source-* are for etch and beyond
Then do
apt-cache show $PACKAGE
and read the
> Can anyone shed any light on the differences between
> the various kernel source packages in the
repository,
> and which is the best choice for just being able to
> reproduce the running kernel?
>
> The example in my Martin Kraft book refers to:
> apt-get install kernel-source-2.6.8
> but
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 10:14:38PM +0100, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>> In Sarge, in order to configure Debian for my modem, I started with:
>>
>> # apt-get install kernel-source-2.4.27
>>
>> . Now, in Etch, what should the package be in place of that? I couldn't
>> find it! I tried with ...2.6,
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 10:14:38PM +0100, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Hi to all Debian users.
>
> In Sarge, in order to configure Debian for my modem, I started with:
>
> # apt-get install kernel-source-2.4.27
>
> . Now, in Etch, what should the package be in place of that? I couldn't find
> it!
On 22:14 Mon 31 Dec , Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Hi to all Debian users.
>
> In Sarge, in order to configure Debian for my modem, I started with:
>
> # apt-get install kernel-source-2.4.27
>
> . Now, in Etch, what should the package be in place of that? I couldn't find
> it! I tried with ..
ChadDavis wrote:
Thanks man. I was trying to find "kernel-source", to no avail.
That one has caught me out too. Somewhere along the way it changed from
kernel-source-tumptytum to linux-source-tumptytum.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 11:07:55AM -0700, ChadDavis wrote:
> Thanks man. I was trying to find "kernel-source", to no avail.
at some point in the past few months, the renamed the kernels as there
is now a BSD version of Debian. all linux kernel stuff is now
linux-[image|source|headers|tree]
A
>
Thanks man. I was trying to find "kernel-source", to no avail.
On 11/5/06, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 10:54:31AM -0700, ChadDavis wrote:
> Where's my source tree? How do I get one if I don't have one?
>
[apt-get|aptitude|whatever] install linux-so
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 10:54:31AM -0700, ChadDavis wrote:
> Where's my source tree? How do I get one if I don't have one?
>
[apt-get|aptitude|whatever] install linux-source-
A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 01:36:55PM -0700, tom arnall wrote:
>
> I am in the middle of getting the madwifi driver to work for a d-link
> wireless
> card. In the course of doing the make for the wifi driver, I encountered the
> following error:
>
> make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/ker
Chris Howie wrote:
[snipped...]
# apt-get install linux-headers-$(uname -r) module-assistant
# m-a a-i nvidia
# apt-get install nvidia-glx nvidia-settings
# modprobe nvidia
# echo nvidia >> /etc/modules
# dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg
Just in case anyone else has to go through this there's a
Oliver Elphick wrote:
On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 10:38 +, Bob wrote:
...So I decided to
install the kernel source, but I can't find a package for it? Am I
missing something here, or can I not download the 2.6.x kernel source
via apt...?
On sid, the packages are now called linux-source-2.6.x rat
Chris Howie wrote:
Bob wrote:
Thanks for the info, as you can see I'm pretty clueless about this kind
of thing. I take it the "m-a a-i" bit is something to do with this
module-assistant package...?
Yeah, m-a a-i = module-assistant auto-install or something like that.
Do I need to install the
Bob wrote:
> Thanks for the info, as you can see I'm pretty clueless about this kind
> of thing. I take it the "m-a a-i" bit is something to do with this
> module-assistant package...?
Yeah, m-a a-i = module-assistant auto-install or something like that.
> Do I need to install the NVidia drivers
On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 10:38 +, Bob wrote:
> ...So I decided to
> install the kernel source, but I can't find a package for it? Am I
> missing something here, or can I not download the 2.6.x kernel source
> via apt...?
On sid, the packages are now called linux-source-2.6.x rather than
kernel-so
Chris Howie wrote:
[snipped...]
Again, you only need the headers.
# apt-get install linux-headers-$(uname -r) module-assistant
# m-a a-i nvidia
# apt-get install nvidia-glx nvidia-settings
# modprobe nvidia
# echo nvidia >> /etc/modules
# dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg
Thanks for the info, as
Bob wrote:
> Hello list, I recently bought a GForce 6600GT AGP graphics card to
> replace an old GForce card. I needed this for running a particular
> application under Windows that required a card with 128Mb of memory.
>
> I was running Sarge and after the install XFree86 wouldn't work, which
> I
Fred Proctor wrote:
I still don't know how to build a kernel from source identitical to the
kernel binary provided with the Debian netinstall. If anyone knows how
to do that, please let me know.
--Fred
I'm still fairly new to linux but here's what I do. I dont use initrd's
now and prefer
I gave up on compiling the whole 2.6.14 kernel to get working Intel HDA
sound drivers, and instead compiled the sound drivers against the
headers in the installed 2.6.12 kernel. This meant fixing some
references to new 2.6.14 kernel functions (kzmalloc, kstrdup), which I
found and pasted into t
On 12/22/05, Wim De Smet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/22/05, Fred Proctor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have installed Debian Testing via the netinstall, and have a kernel
> > 2.6.12-1-386 from Debian testing (etch). I'd like to make some changes
> > to the kernel source, namely the device
On 12/22/05, Fred Proctor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have installed Debian Testing via the netinstall, and have a kernel
> 2.6.12-1-386 from Debian testing (etch). I'd like to make some changes
> to the kernel source, namely the device driver for my sound chip. I
> installed what I thought was
Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 the mental interface of
Jerome BENOIT told:
Hello,
[...]
As a matter of fact, I had swich them off to avoid errors:
for the stream, I have just checked them back and tried to build: I get
Please ignore the warning about overriding and ignori
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 the mental interface of
Jerome BENOIT told:
> Hello,
[...]
> As a matter of fact, I had swich them off to avoid errors:
> for the stream, I have just checked them back and tried to build: I get
>
> Please ignore the warning about overriding and ignoring targets above.
Do a ma
Hello,
Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 the mental interface of
Jerome BENOIT told:
Hello,
I get:
test -f stamp-configure || /usr/bin/make -f /usr/share/kernel-package/rules
configure
/usr/bin/make EXTRAVERSION=-bi8k ARCH=i386 \
bzImage
make[1]: Enterin
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 the mental interface of
Jerome BENOIT told:
> Hello,
>
> I get:
>
> test -f stamp-configure || /usr/bin/make -f /usr/share/kernel-package/rules
> configure
> /usr/bin/make EXTRAVERSION=-bi8k ARCH=i386 \
> bzImage
> make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/loca
Hello,
I get:
test -f stamp-configure || /usr/bin/make -f /usr/share/kernel-package/rules
configure
/usr/bin/make EXTRAVERSION=-bi8k ARCH=i386 \
bzImage
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/kernel-source-2.6.11-bi8k'
CHK include/linux/version.h
make[2]: `arch/i
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 the mental interface of
Jerome BENOIT told:
> Hello,
>
> thanks for the trick.
>
> I have just tried it,
> but unfortunately I still get the same error messages:
> the problem is somewhere else.
^^
This is a unknown error message. What are the re
Hello,
thanks for the trick.
I have just tried it,
but unfortunately I still get the same error messages:
the problem is somewhere else.
Jerome
Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 the mental interface of
Elimar Riesebieter told:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 the mental interface of
Jerom
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 the mental interface of
Elimar Riesebieter told:
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 the mental interface of
> Jerome BENOIT told:
>
> > Hello List,
> >
> > I have jsut tried to build a kernel 2.6.11 with make-kernel on the daily
> > update
> > Etch box:
> > while I could do a few weeks
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 the mental interface of
Jerome BENOIT told:
> Hello List,
>
> I have jsut tried to build a kernel 2.6.11 with make-kernel on the daily
> update
> Etch box:
> while I could do a few weeks ago it without difficulty,
> I get now error messages: I suspected that
> gcc-4.0 finds
>From the make-kpkg manual page:
"You may control which version of gcc used in kernel compilation by
setting the Makefile variables CC and HOSTCC in the top level kernel
Makefile. You can do this simply by
% MAKEFLAGS="CC=gcc-2.95" make-kpkg ...
"
Cheers,
JoelOn 8/30/05, Jerome BENOIT
Hello,
thanks for your reply:
finally I built a 2.6.12.6 kernel with with gcc-4.0 .
As a matter of fact, I do not know how to proceed to build a kernel
with make-kpkg and a non-default gcc compiler:
I had tried
export HOSTCC=gcc-3.4
export HOSTCXX=g++-3.4
export CC=gcc-3.4
export CXX=g++-3.4
On 8/29/05, Jerome BENOIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello List,I have jsut tried to build a kernel 2.6.11 with make-kernel on the daily update Etch box:while I could do a few weeks ago it without difficulty,I get now error messages: I suspected thatgcc-4.0
finds code errors where gcc-3.x finds no
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 11:53:36PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> while I could do a few weeks ago it without difficulty, I get now error
> messages: I suspected that gcc-4.0 finds code errors where gcc-3.x finds
> nothing.
Why don't you use gcc 3.x, then?
--
Marc Wilson | A wise man can see
Ron Johnson wrote:
Hi,
Anyone know why kernel-source-2.6.x was renamed to linux-source-2.6.x
for 2.6.12?
Google didn't reveal a reason.
Ron
As I understand it, the name was changed to allow for future use of HURD
or Linux kernels in the standard distributions.
Frank
--
To UNSU
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 05:18:35PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Anyone know why kernel-source-2.6.x was renamed to linux-source-2.6.x
> > for 2.6.12?
>
> If I had to hazard a guess it is because Debian has other projects (Hurd,
> BSD) which have kernels which are not the L
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 23:15 -0500, Gayle Lee Fairless wrote:
> Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Ron Johnson wrote:
> >
> >
> >>> Anyone know why kernel-source-2.6.x was renamed to linux-source-2.6.x
> >>> for 2.6.12?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >If I had to hazard a guess it is because Deb
Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Anyone know why kernel-source-2.6.x was renamed to linux-source-2.6.x
for 2.6.12?
If I had to hazard a guess it is because Debian has other projects (Hurd,
BSD) which have kernels which are not the Linux kernel.
Yep!
In
Ron Johnson wrote:
> Anyone know why kernel-source-2.6.x was renamed to linux-source-2.6.x
> for 2.6.12?
If I had to hazard a guess it is because Debian has other projects (Hurd,
BSD) which have kernels which are not the Linux kernel.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm
Another interesting question: if i install "kernel-source-2.6.8" and at
the same time "kernel-header-2.6.7", what will happen?
When I installed the 2.6 kernel on my sarge system (coz I didn't realize I
could have installed it from the CD, shoulda read the help), it was added to
the grub boot m
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 11:22:33PM +0800, lianliming wrote:
> Hi all,
> i want to compile and install a new kernel. Using aptitude to search the
> "kernel" package, i find there are "kernel-source" and "kernel-header"
> packages.
> Should i install the both kernel "source" and "header" t
Hello
lianliming (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> i want to compile and install a new kernel. Using aptitude to
> search the "kernel" package, i find there are "kernel-source" and
> "kernel-header" packages. Should i install the both kernel "source"
> and "header" to install the new kernel?
If
On Monday 01 November 2004 15:22, lianliming wrote:
> Hi all,
> i want to compile and install a new kernel. Using aptitude to search
> the "kernel" package, i find there are "kernel-source" and "kernel-header"
> packages.
> Should i install the both kernel "source" and "header" to install
Thanks for explanation,
Thus I have to live with "unsupported" configuration for a some time :(
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Mirek, hello list!
On Sun, Oct 31, 2004 at 05:04:32PM +0100, Mirek Stefanski wrote:
> month or two ago Ive got from propsed-updates for woody packages:
> kernel-image-2.4.26-2-386 and kernel-source-2.4.26 and successfully
> instaled. Today after apt-get update I notice that this packages a
Oliver Fuchs wrote:
Hi,
at the moment I am trying to update (change would the the better word)
my kernel from version 2.2.20 to 2.4.18.
I am using the debian packages kernel-source-2.4.18 and have compiled and
installed it - using the configuration file from the kernel-image-2.4.18
package - I only
On Sunday 06 June 2004 10:59 am, Craig Genner wrote:
> I'm no expert but you could try:
>
> agt-get install kernel-source
>
> Thanks
>
> Craig
>
> On Sunday 06 Jun 2004 18:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi
> > I have Kernel-2.6.3-1-386 (Sarge) installed
> >
> >
> > Need to download the source to
I'm no expert but you could try:
agt-get install kernel-source
Thanks
Craig
On Sunday 06 Jun 2004 18:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi
> I have Kernel-2.6.3-1-386 (Sarge) installed
>
>
> Need to download the source to put the Nvidiai driver into it.
>
>
> Where and how do I get this?
>
>
> (Pit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello I am looking for linux kernel source any version
Check www.kernel.org - the official repository.
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 05 March 2004 17:34, CW Harris wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 09:56:33AM +0100, Richard Lyons wrote:
> > On Friday 05 March 2004 01:39, CW Harris wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 09:34:27PM +0100, Richard Lyons wrote:
>
>
>
> So you cd /usr/src/linux-2.4.22/, it contains "Makefile"
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 09:56:33AM +0100, Richard Lyons wrote:
> On Friday 05 March 2004 01:39, CW Harris wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 09:34:27PM +0100, Richard Lyons wrote:
> > Maybe I'm misunderstanding. You do:
> > cd /usr/src/linux-2.4.22
> > make-kpkg modules-image
> >
> > and
On Friday 05 March 2004 10:20, David Baron wrote:
> On Friday 05 March 2004 03:52,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
> > Maybe I'm misunderstanding. You do:
> > cd /usr/src/linux-2.4.22
> > make-kpkg modules-image
> >
> > and you get the error:
> >
> > And yet /usr/src/linux-2.4.22 co
On Friday 05 March 2004 01:39, CW Harris wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 09:34:27PM +0100, Richard Lyons wrote:
> > On Thursday 04 March 2004 19:40, CW Harris wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 09:47:38AM -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> > > > On 2004-03-04, Richard Lyons penned:
[...]
> > > >
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 09:34:27PM +0100, Richard Lyons wrote:
> On Thursday 04 March 2004 19:40, CW Harris wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 09:47:38AM -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> > > On 2004-03-04, Richard Lyons penned:
> > > > Another really dim question coming up...
> > > >
> > > > I'm t
On Thursday 04 March 2004 19:40, CW Harris wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 09:47:38AM -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> > On 2004-03-04, Richard Lyons penned:
> > > Another really dim question coming up...
> > >
> > > I'm trying to install thinkpad drivers for Debian. Instructions
> > > say to unp
On Thursday 04 March 2004 17:47, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> On 2004-03-04, Richard Lyons penned:
> > Another really dim question coming up...
> >
> > I'm trying to install thinkpad drivers for Debian. Instructions say
> > to unpack the thinkpad.tar.gz (no problem there) and then to "cd to
> > the r
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 09:47:38AM -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
> On 2004-03-04, Richard Lyons penned:
> > Another really dim question coming up...
> >
> > I'm trying to install thinkpad drivers for Debian. Instructions say to
> > unpack the thinkpad.tar.gz (no problem there) and then to "cd to
On 2004-03-04, Richard Lyons penned:
> Another really dim question coming up...
>
> I'm trying to install thinkpad drivers for Debian. Instructions say to
> unpack the thinkpad.tar.gz (no problem there) and then to "cd to the
> root of the source tree for the kernel for which you want to compile
On Fri, 2004-02-20 at 01:15, Andreas Janssen wrote:
> Olle Eriksson (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> > What is the difference between the kernel source from kernel.org and
> > the Debian kernel-source-* packages? The only thing I can find about
> > that is some discussion from 1997 concluding that t
The differance between vanilla kernels and debian kernels is that Debian
a) removes stuff it believes to not be sufficiently free - something
about patches to eeproms
b) adds some patches - e.g. some additional network card drivers
Also in my experiance they don't create the /usr/src/linux symlink
On 2004-02-19, Olle Eriksson penned:
> Hi
>
> What is the difference between the kernel source from kernel.org and
> the Debian kernel-source-* packages? The only thing I can find about
> that is some discussion from 1997 concluding that there is no
> difference except that the debian packages hand
Hello
Olle Eriksson (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> What is the difference between the kernel source from kernel.org and
> the Debian kernel-source-* packages? The only thing I can find about
> that is some discussion from 1997 concluding that there is no
> difference except that the debian packag
Olle Eriksson wrote:
Hi
What is the difference between the kernel source from kernel.org and the
Debian kernel-source-* packages? The only thing I can find about that is
some discussion from 1997 concluding that there is no difference except
that the debian packages handles the /usr/src/linux syml
Olle Eriksson wrote:
> Hi
>
> What is the difference between the kernel source from kernel.org and
> the Debian kernel-source-* packages? The only thing I can find about
> that is some discussion from 1997 concluding that there is no
> difference except that the debian packages handles the /usr/src
Hello Olle!
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 12:04:48AM +0100, Olle Eriksson wrote:
> What is the difference between the kernel source from kernel.org and the
> Debian kernel-source-* packages? The only thing I can find about that is
The README.Debian lists several changes, including additions, patches
an
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 08:44:14AM +, Sam Bashton wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 01:53:05AM -0500, Thomas H. George wrote:
> > I compiled a new kernel from kernel-source-2.6.0-test9 and, after
> > installing module-init-tools, most of my modules are loaded and working
> > except for my pci
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 01:53:05AM -0500, Thomas H. George wrote:
> I compiled a new kernel from kernel-source-2.6.0-test9 and, after
> installing module-init-tools, most of my modules are loaded and working
> except for my pci wireless networking card. This has always been
> something of a pro
Hi Thomas,
* Thomas H. George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031113 08:18]:
> I compiled a new kernel from kernel-source-2.6.0-test9 and, after
> installing module-init-tools, most of my modules are loaded and working
> except for my pci wireless networking card. This has always been
> something of a p
At Sun, 14 Sep 2003 13:38:42 -0400,
Greg Folkert wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 19:57, csj wrote:
> > At Sat, 13 Sep 2003 11:29:57 -0500,
> > John Hasler wrote:
> > >
> > > csj writes:
> > > > Qt is now required to configure a kernel?
> > >
> > > No. "make config" and "make menuconfig
--- Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 13:38:42 -0400,
> Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 19:57, csj wrote:
> > > At Sat, 13 Sep 2003 11:29:57 -0500,
> > > John Hasler wrote:
> > > >
> > > > csj
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 13:38:42 -0400,
Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 19:57, csj wrote:
> > At Sat, 13 Sep 2003 11:29:57 -0500,
> > John Hasler wrote:
> > >
> > > csj writes:
> > > > Qt is now required to configure a kernel?
> > >
>
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 19:57, csj wrote:
> At Sat, 13 Sep 2003 11:29:57 -0500,
> John Hasler wrote:
> >
> > csj writes:
> > > Qt is now required to configure a kernel?
> >
> > No. "make config" and "make menuconfig" still work.
>
> Well, of course ;-). I assume by your statement that "make
> xc
csj writes:
> I assume by your statement that "make xconfig" now requires qt.
I assume so, but I've never tried it.
> And why not gtk (do I see flame war coming)?
Why would you need any GUI at all for configuring a kernel? (Menuconfig is
not a GUI).
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Has
At Sat, 13 Sep 2003 11:29:57 -0500,
John Hasler wrote:
>
> csj writes:
> > Qt is now required to configure a kernel?
>
> No. "make config" and "make menuconfig" still work.
Well, of course ;-). I assume by your statement that "make
xconfig" now requires qt. And why not gtk (do I see flame war
csj writes:
> Qt is now required to configure a kernel?
No. "make config" and "make menuconfig" still work.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PRO
At 12 Sep 2003 23:30:19 -0400,
Neal Lippman wrote:
>
> Has anyone been able to successfully use this package? I
> installed it but make xconfig just dies with a million errors,
> all coming out of scripts/kconfig/qconf.o.
>
> For reference, I have installed libqt-dev, so I thought I would
> be go
On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 01:00:13PM -0700, M.Forbes wrote:
> I need to know what the name and location would be as for the kernel-source in
> order to get my Ethernet card working.
> I was getting an error in line 27 that the kernel source was not able to be found.
> I was able to find that I ha
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 13:00:13 -0700,
"M.Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I need to know what the name and location would be as for the
> kernel-source in order to get my Ethernet card working. I was getting
..ok, you told us you own your card, which is reason
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 13:00:13 -0700
"M.Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need to know what the name and location would be as for the
> kernel-source in order to get my Ethernet card working.
> I was getting an error in line 27 that the kernel source was not able to
> be found. I was able to
* M.Forbes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030823 22:00]:
> I am currently running the woody 3 distro of Debian with kernel
> 2.4.18.
> Can someone throw me a clue? (I tried #ksrc
> :=/usr/src/kernel-source-2.x.xx but there are no files that are
> showing in my usr directory or the subdirectories there of )
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 22:20:14 +0200, M.Forbes wrote:
> I need to know what the name and location would be as for the
> kernel-source in order to get my Ethernet card working.
> I was getting an error in line 27 that the kernel source was not able to
> be found. I was able to find that I have to a
On Monday 04 August 2003 4:20 pm, Rich Puhek wrote:
>
> Very handy to compile on one machine, scp kernal_image.servername.1
> servername:/usr/local/src and dpkg -i the image...
>
There is no doubt about the advantages of compiling in one machine for many...
but if you only have one, then I do not
On Monday 04 August 2003 3:43 pm, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 03:29:51PM -0500, Marino Fernandez wrote:
> > I cannot help you with the debian way... that I found more complex than
> > the regular way.
> >
> > Download a pristine kernel (get 2.6.0-test2)
> > cd /usr/src
> > Un
Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 03:29:51PM -0500, Marino Fernandez wrote:
I cannot help you with the debian way... that I found more complex than the
regular way.
Download a pristine kernel (get 2.6.0-test2)
cd /usr/src
Untar kernel in /usr/src
mv linux linux~
ln -s linux-2.6.0-
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 03:29:51PM -0500, Marino Fernandez wrote:
> I cannot help you with the debian way... that I found more complex than the
> regular way.
>
> Download a pristine kernel (get 2.6.0-test2)
> cd /usr/src
> Untar kernel in /usr/src
> mv linux linux~
> ln -s linux-2.6.0-test2 linu
On Monday 04 August 2003 8:57 am, François Chenais wrote:
> doesn't work :-|
>
>
>
> tanna:~/tmp/kernel-image-2.6.0-test1-i386-2.6.0-test1# apt-get build-dep
> kernel-image-2.6.0-test1-i386 Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> E: Build-Depends dependency for kernel-ima
doesn't work :-|
tanna:~/tmp/kernel-image-2.6.0-test1-i386-2.6.0-test1# apt-get build-dep
kernel-image-2.6.0-test1-i386
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
E: Build-Depends dependency for kernel-image-2.6.0-test1-i386 cannot be satisfied
because the package kernel-so
Hello,
Is this working with test2 flavour ??
François
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 21:46:22 CEST
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Le Dimanche 3 Août 2003 21:26, Travis Crump a écrit :
> > Where can I find the source used to build kernel-image-2.6.0-test1-i386?
> > kernel-source-2.6.
#include
* Travis Crump [Sun, Aug 03 2003, 03:26:07PM]:
> Where can I find the source used to build kernel-image-2.6.0-test1-i386?
apt-get source kernel-image-2.6.0-test1-i386
apt-get build-dep kernel-image-2.6.0-test1-i386
MfG,
Eduard.
--
Labello und kein Kuß quietscht mehr.
--
To UNSUBSCRI
On Sun, 2003-08-03 at 22:26, Travis Crump wrote:
> Where can I find the source used to build kernel-image-2.6.0-test1-i386?
> kernel-source-2.6.0-test1 doesn't exist as far as I can determine[and
> apt-get source kernel-source-2.6.0-test1-i386 and/or apt-get build-dep
> kernel-source-2.6.0-tes
Le Dimanche 3 Août 2003 21:26, Travis Crump a écrit :
> Where can I find the source used to build kernel-image-2.6.0-test1-i386?
> kernel-source-2.6.0-test1 doesn't exist as far as I can determine[and
> apt-get source kernel-source-2.6.0-test1-i386 and/or apt-get build-dep
> kernel-source-2.6.0-t
As an update with my inability to unarchive my copy of the
kernel-source**.deb.
Since I wasn't having any luck on this machine, I copied the *.bz file
to my other machine (RH 7.3), and proceeded to "bzip2 -d" & "tar xvf"
resulting in a good archive.
I again tried on the debian machine, on the 3 d
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:28:03 -0700
Vineet Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Rodney D. Myers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030730 13:50]:
> > On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 00:44:49 -0700
> > Vineet Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > * Rodney D. Myers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030729 21:12]:
> > > > Well, on of
* Rodney D. Myers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030730 13:50]:
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 00:44:49 -0700
> Vineet Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > * Rodney D. Myers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030729 21:12]:
> > > Well, on of the maintainers closed the report. Seems it's supposed
> > > to be a bad download.
> >
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 00:44:49 -0700
Vineet Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Rodney D. Myers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030729 21:12]:
> > Well, on of the maintainers closed the report. Seems it's supposed
> > to be a bad download.
>
> Works for me. Maybe your mirror has a bad deb?
>
> wingnut:/usr
* Rodney D. Myers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030729 21:12]:
> Well, on of the maintainers closed the report. Seems it's supposed to be
> a bad download.
Works for me. Maybe your mirror has a bad deb?
wingnut:/usr/src% ls -l kernel-source-2.5.69.tar.bz2
-rw-r--r--1 root root 31380359 2003-0
Well, on of the maintainers closed the report. Seems it's supposed to be
a bad download.
Just tried again, and the file size is the same, and the same result.
Oh well, I guess tinkering with building kernels' wasn't meant to be
--
Rodney D. Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Registered Linux User #9
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 23:36:04 +0200
Tobias Bär <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rodney D. Myers schrieb:
> > Who do I contact about a bad *.deb file?
> >
> > Everytime I try to "bzip2 d" the above file I get;
> >
> > bzip2 --test kernel-source-2.5.69.tar.bz2
> > bzip2: kernel-source-2.5.69.tar.bz2: d
1 - 100 of 201 matches
Mail list logo
