On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 12:39:15AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 6/1/2011 6:07 PM, R. Clayton wrote:
> > I'm running squeeze on a system, and I'd like to keep the system on the
> > stable
> > release independent of what the release is called. I changed all
> > non-commented
> > appearances of
On 06/01/2011 04:07 PM, R. Clayton wrote:
I'm running squeeze on a system, and I'd like to keep the system on the stable
release independent of what the release is called. I changed all non-commented
appearances of "squeeze" with "stable" in sources.list; do I need to do
anything else? Is this
On Jun 2, 2011 2:19 PM, "William Hopkins" wrote:
>
> On 06/02/11 at 02:08pm, Tom Furie wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 11:15:37AM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> > > Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
> > > >
> > > > You're much better off simply changing sources.list right
> > > > before your next distri
On 06/02/11 at 02:08pm, Tom Furie wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 11:15:37AM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> > Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
> > >
> > > You're much better off simply changing sources.list right
> > > before your next distribution upgrade. This is what Debian recommends,
> > > oddly en
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 11:15:37AM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
> >
> > You're much better off simply changing sources.list right
> > before your next distribution upgrade. This is what Debian recommends,
> > oddly enough
>
> Oddly ?
It's another of the strange idioms
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 19:07:40 -0400, R. Clayton wrote:
> I'm running squeeze on a system, and I'd like to keep the system on the
> stable release independent of what the release is called.
That seems a contradictory selection of words :-)
Stable is _now_ squeeze but it will be wheezy as soon as
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 12:07:40AM +0100, R. Clayton wrote:
> I'm running squeeze on a system, and I'd like to keep the system on the stable
> release independent of what the release is called. I changed all
> non-commented
> appearances of "squeeze" with "stable" in sources.list; do I need to do
On 02/06/11 01:07, R. Clayton wrote:
> I'm running squeeze on a system, and I'd like to keep the system on the stable
> release independent of what the release is called. I changed all
> non-commented
> appearances of "squeeze" with "stable" in sources.list; do I need to do
> anything else? Is t
Stan Hoeppner a écrit :
>
> You're much better off simply changing sources.list right
> before your next distribution upgrade. This is what Debian recommends,
> oddly enough
Oddly ?
The recommended upgrade path described in the Release notes is usually
more complex than just running "apt-get upd
On 6/1/2011 6:07 PM, R. Clayton wrote:
> I'm running squeeze on a system, and I'd like to keep the system on the stable
> release independent of what the release is called. I changed all
> non-commented
> appearances of "squeeze" with "stable" in sources.list; do I need to do
> anything else? Is
R. Clayton writes:
> Is this the right approach to take for a perpetually stable system?
Probably not (though I don't know exactly what you are trying to
achieve). When the next release occurs the "stable" link will be
abruptly changed to point to Wheezy (which is now "testing"). Squeeze
will th
Yes that's all.
On Jun 1, 2011 7:15 PM, "R. Clayton" wrote:
> I'm running squeeze on a system, and I'd like to keep the system on the
stable
> release independent of what the release is called. I changed all
non-commented
> appearances of "squeeze" with "stable" in sources.list; do I need to do
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
