Re: Keeping kernel compilation options

2001-07-22 Thread Mart van de Wege
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001 02:49:00 +1000 Steve Kowalik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 05:14:22PM +0200, Mart van de Wege uttered: > > Sorry to butt in in this thread, but my question seems to belong here > as > > well. I noticed yesterday that installing kernel-package on i386 does

Re: Keeping kernel compilation options

2001-07-22 Thread Joost Kooij
On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 05:14:22PM +0200, Mart van de Wege wrote: > Sorry to butt in in this thread, but my question seems to belong here as > well. I noticed yesterday that installing kernel-package on i386 does not > install bin86, which is necessary to build the boot code. Now I know Joost > is

Re: Keeping kernel compilation options

2001-07-22 Thread Steve Kowalik
On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 05:14:22PM +0200, Mart van de Wege uttered: > Sorry to butt in in this thread, but my question seems to belong here as > well. I noticed yesterday that installing kernel-package on i386 does not > install bin86, which is necessary to build the boot code. Now I know Joost > i

Re: Keeping kernel compilation options

2001-07-22 Thread Mart van de Wege
On Sun, 22 Jul 2001 01:02:35 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joost Kooij) wrote: > There are so many compelling reasons to use kernel-package that > they are listed in a document in /usr/share/doc/kernel-package. > Installing kernel-package will also pull in the other packages > needed to build the kern

Re: Keeping kernel compilation options

2001-07-21 Thread Joost Kooij
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 03:31:01PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote: > What is the recommended way to keep your responses to the > kernel configuration options when using the debian kernel > package tools? Use kernel-package to build your kernels. It saves your .config in /boot/config- so you always knw