Brian McGroarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 12:39:16AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 03:54:31PM +0800, Arne Goetje wrote:
>> > > Btw, is kde3.1 already in sid? I thought when I did my upgrade kde
>> > > would be upgraded, but nothing happend...
>>
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 10:43:03AM +0100, Tom Verbreyt wrote:
>> Paul Johnson sagte:
>> > You might consider switching back, as they really are putting KDE
>> > 3.1 in sid, just waiting on dependancies to work thier way down now.
>>
>> Now how do you peo
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 08:31:03PM +0330, Aryan Ameri wrote:
> > For the umpteenth time, yes, I'm sure. This is really happening.
> > Damn, folks, you bitch about how slow things take to update, then you
> > don't believe it when it happens.
>
> I admit that's right ;-)
>
> maybe it's because we
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 08:18:55AM -0600, Brian McGroarty wrote:
> Is there an automated process at work, or do you mean waiting on bug
> reports from people who find things missing?
Neither. It takes a while, especially when the developers have lives,
to compile and package the world.
--
.''`
On Friday 07 February 2003 14:08, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:52:49PM +0330, Aryan Ameri wrote:
> > Are you sure they are putting 3.1 in sid? I use 3.1 RC5 right now, and
> > would like to upgrade to sid, instead of just upgrading to KDE 3.1 final,
> > if they are gonna put 3.1
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 08:18:55AM -0600, Brian McGroarty wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 12:39:16AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > You might consider switching back, as they really are putting KDE 3.1
> > in sid, just waiting on dependancies to work thier way down now.
>
> What does that mean, "
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 12:39:16AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 03:54:31PM +0800, Arne Goetje wrote:
> > > Btw, is kde3.1 already in sid? I thought when I did my upgrade kde
> > > would be upgraded, but nothing happend...
>
> You might consider switching back, as they real
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:52:49PM +0330, Aryan Ameri wrote:
> On Friday 07 February 2003 13:35, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > I just happened to look at incoming.debian.org that day and saw random
> > kde 3.1 packages filtering in.
>
> From what I can see, it is just KDE 3.1's language packs. I don't s
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 01:52:49PM +0330, Aryan Ameri wrote:
> Are you sure they are putting 3.1 in sid? I use 3.1 RC5 right now, and would
> like to upgrade to sid, instead of just upgrading to KDE 3.1 final, if they
> are gonna put 3.1 in sid in the next one or two weeks.
http://packages.debia
On Friday 07 February 2003 13:35, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 10:43:03AM +0100, Tom Verbreyt wrote:
> > > You might consider switching back, as they really are putting KDE
> > > 3.1 in sid, just waiting on dependancies to work thier way down now.
> >
> > Now how do you people know
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 10:43:03AM +0100, Tom Verbreyt wrote:
> Paul Johnson sagte:
> > You might consider switching back, as they really are putting KDE
> > 3.1 in sid, just waiting on dependancies to work thier way down now.
>
> Now how do you people know that so fast and so sure? I seem
> to al
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 10:43:03AM +0100, Tom Verbreyt wrote:
> > You might consider switching back, as they really are putting KDE
> > 3.1 in sid, just waiting on dependancies to work thier way down now.
>
> Now how do you people know that so fast and so sure? I seem
> to always be the latest to
Paul Johnson sagte:
> You might consider switching back, as they really are putting KDE
> 3.1 in sid, just waiting on dependancies to work thier way down now.
Now how do you people know that so fast and so sure? I seem
to always be the latest to get to know such "important" news...
Anyway. Excit
Paul Johnson sagte:
> You might consider switching back, as they really are putting KDE
> 3.1 in sid, just waiting on dependancies to work thier way down now.
Now how do you people know that so fast and so sure? I seem
to always be the latest to get to know such "important" news...
Anyway. Excit
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 03:54:31PM +0800, Arne Goetje wrote:
> > Btw, is kde3.1 already in sid? I thought when I did my upgrade kde
> > would be upgraded, but nothing happend...
>
> Seems it's not... I use the packages provided by the KDE team. They work
> fine for me.
>
> deb ftp://download.kd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 07 February 2003 03:30, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 02:06:27PM +0800, Arne Goetje wrote:
> Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
> kde: Depends: libarts or
> libarts-alsa but it is not
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 08:30:31PM +0100, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
> Btw, is kde3.1 already in sid? I thought when I did my upgrade kde
> would be upgraded, but nothing happend...
Give it time for the dependancies to work out.
--
.''`. Baloo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian admin and
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 02:06:27PM +0800, Arne Goetje wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thursday 06 February 2003 05:17, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 06:45:54AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > > KDE starts drifting into sid! .debs at 11:00 (-0100).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 06 February 2003 05:17, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 06:45:54AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > KDE starts drifting into sid! .debs at 11:00 (-0100). There's some
> > kde related debs on incoming.debian.org that should be
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 06:45:54AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> KDE starts drifting into sid! .debs at 11:00 (-0100). There's some
> kde related debs on incoming.debian.org that should be in tonight's
> update.
Before I upgrade my system, does anyone experience some fallbacks?
Upgrading that do
20 matches
Mail list logo
