On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 18:24, David wrote:
> On Sunday 29 June 2003 03:01 am, cr wrote:
> > On Saturday 28 June 2003 05:39, alex wrote:
> > > I'm getting a lot of junk mail that is addressed to this list. Am I
> > >the only one getting this stuff?
> > >
> > > alex
> >
> > The polite term for it
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 08:39 am, Wim De Smet wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 17:24:43 -0500
>
> David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sunday 29 June 2003 03:01 am, cr wrote:
> > > On Saturday 28 June 2003 05:39, alex wrote:
> > > > I'm getting a lot of junk mail that is addressed to this list. Am
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 17:24:43 -0500
David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 29 June 2003 03:01 am, cr wrote:
> > On Saturday 28 June 2003 05:39, alex wrote:
> > > I'm getting a lot of junk mail that is addressed to this list. Am
> > > I the only one getting this stuff?
> > >
> > > alex
> >
>
On Sunday 29 June 2003 03:01 am, cr wrote:
> On Saturday 28 June 2003 05:39, alex wrote:
> > I'm getting a lot of junk mail that is addressed to this list. Am I
> >the only one getting this stuff?
> >
> > alex
>
> The polite term for it is 'Spam':(
>
> Nope, I'm getting it too. Most noti
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 01:39:12PM -0400, alex wrote:
> > I'm getting a lot of junk mail that is addressed to this list. Am I
> > the only one getting this stuff?
>
> Spam filtering on Debian lists was temporarily broken recently.
And it shows how eff
On Sunday 29 June 2003 13:20, Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra wrote:
> The problem is that this is meant to be a *user* list, and lots of users
> don't know how to subscribe... therefore requiring subscription to post is
> a no-no.
I think what alex meant is the sudden flood of spam t
On Fri, June 27 at 1:39 PM EDT
alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm getting a lot of junk mail that is addressed to this list. Am I
>the only one getting this stuff?
Can you quantify "a lot"? I get maybe 3 or 4 spam emails a week on this
list, but sometimes I will go a week without any a
On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 13:39, alex wrote:
> I'm getting a lot of junk mail that is addressed to this list. Am I
>the only one getting this stuff?
No.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 01:39:12PM -0400, alex wrote:
> I'm getting a lot of junk mail that is addressed to this list. Am I
> the only one getting this stuff?
If it's addressed to the list, wouldn't it be safe to assume everyone
else is as well?
- -
On Saturday 28 June 2003 05:39, alex wrote:
> I'm getting a lot of junk mail that is addressed to this list. Am I
>the only one getting this stuff?
>
> alex
The polite term for it is 'Spam':(
Nope, I'm getting it too. Most noticeably the loony with his 60-K-sized
posts about 'IEEP' an
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 01:39:12PM -0400, alex wrote:
> I'm getting a lot of junk mail that is addressed to this list. Am I
> the only one getting this stuff?
Nope. Over the last few days I've been getting very little legitimate
traffic from this list, and an unusually high proportion of junk
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 01:39:12PM -0400, alex wrote:
> I'm getting a lot of junk mail that is addressed to this list. Am I
> the only one getting this stuff?
No, the list server had some major difficulties with it's spam filters
last week.
--
Jamin W. Collins
To be nobody but yourself when
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 01:39:12PM -0400, alex wrote:
> I'm getting a lot of junk mail that is addressed to this list. Am I
> the only one getting this stuff?
Spam filtering on Debian lists was temporarily broken recently.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 13:39:12 -0400, alex wrote:
> I'm getting a lot of junk mail that is addressed to this list. Am I
>the only one getting this stuff?
No you aren't.
The problem is that this is meant to be a *user* list, and lots of users
don't know how to subscribe... the
14 matches
Mail list logo
