Re: Java problem

2002-04-28 Thread Mental
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 08:05:10PM +0200, Jesper Holmberg wrote: > > > * On Sat Apr 27, Dale Hair wrote: > > You might try the latest version. I'm using j2re1.3_1.3.1_i386.deb with > > no problems. > > I use the latest versions: mozilla-browser_0.9.9-6_i386.deb >j2sd

Re: Java problem

2002-04-27 Thread Jesper Holmberg
* On Sat Apr 27, Dale Hair wrote: > You might try the latest version. I'm using j2re1.3_1.3.1_i386.deb with > no problems. I use the latest versions: mozilla-browser_0.9.9-6_i386.deb j2sdk1.3_1.3.1-1_i386.deb Still Mozilla just crashes when an applet is loading. Happ

Re: Java problem

2002-04-27 Thread Dale Hair
On Fri, 2002-04-26 at 23:39, sda wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 10:47:04PM -0500, dman wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 09:59:05PM -0400, sda wrote: > > | Hello: > > | > > | Just installed java blackdown, > > > > How? Did you apt-get or did you use a tarball? If you apt-get it > > from one

Re: Java problem

2002-04-26 Thread dman
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 09:59:05PM -0400, sda wrote: | Hello: | | Just installed java blackdown, How? Did you apt-get or did you use a tarball? If you apt-get it from one of their mirros you'll have no problems whatsoever. (well, if you did it a few months ago you won't have problems, I presum

Re: Java problem

2002-04-26 Thread Quenten Griffith
I think in the readme for Java that you d/l you will see something that suggests you don't link the plugin rather you copy it to the ../netscape/plugin directory, instead of linking it. Usually its installed under /usr/local/netscape/plugins. Look for the readme file in the Java directory. sda w

Re: Java problem

1999-12-29 Thread Michael Meskes
On Tue, Dec 28, 1999 at 08:03:51PM +0100, Roland Rosenfeld wrote: > I just found out, that the bug only occurs if you use native threads. > Simply add the option -green to java and it will work correct > (removing jdk1.1-native[-dev] also should help). Argh! And I thought I could tell you somethin

Re: Java problem

1999-12-29 Thread Michael Meskes
On Tue, Dec 28, 1999 at 07:03:26PM +, Alisdair McDiarmid wrote: > FWIW, I'm using jdk1.1 version 1.1.7v3-2 on 2.2.13 and all my Java > development stuff works perfectly well. Does StarOffice work for you? Do you have jdk1.1-nnative installed? Michael -- Michael Meskes

Re: Java problem

1999-12-29 Thread Michael Meskes
On Tue, Dec 28, 1999 at 08:31:43PM -0800, aphro wrote: > Juergen Kreileder replied regarding the Java tool, "I've fixed the problem > several weeks ago, the new JDK will be released in a couple of days." Which version is the fixed one? Michael -- Michael Meskes | Go SF 4

Re: Java problem

1999-12-29 Thread aphro
sounds like this problem: http://kt.linuxcare.com/kt19991122_44.html#5 It was pointed out that the latest stable kernels break StarOffice (or rather the Java tool StarOffice depended on). Andrea Arcangeli asked Alan to back out of the stable tree the (purely semantic) patch that had caused the br

Re: Java problem

1999-12-28 Thread Roland Rosenfeld
reassign 48807 jdk1.1-native thanks On Tue, 28 Dec 1999, Michael Meskes wrote: > > I reported this as Bug #48807 against version jdk1.1 1.1.7v2-2 > > some time ago. > So that means this is an old bug and one that's not fixed. That's true. > Or is it fixed in the latest release? Don't know, I

Re: Java problem

1999-12-28 Thread Alisdair McDiarmid
On Tue, Dec 28, 1999 at 04:19:46PM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote: > Everytime I start a JAVA program (that runs fine on a SuSe machine with > jdk-1.1.7v3) I only get the messages: > > Cannot open /proc/00525 for GCCannot open /proc/00534 for GC > [snip] > > Is there anything wrong with my setup?

Re: Java problem

1999-12-28 Thread Michael Meskes
On Tue, Dec 28, 1999 at 04:13:35PM +, Roland Rosenfeld wrote: > I reported this as Bug #48807 against version jdk1.1 1.1.7v2-2 some > time ago. So that means this is an old bug and one that's not fixed. Or is it fixed in the latest release? Hay, if SuSe is able to run that software why aren't

Re: Java problem

1999-12-28 Thread Roland Rosenfeld
Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Everytime I start a JAVA program (that runs fine on a SuSe machine > with jdk-1.1.7v3) I only get the messages: > Cannot open /proc/00525 for GCCannot open /proc/00534 for GC I reported this as Bug #48807 against version jdk1.1 1.1.7v2-2 some time ago.

Re: Java Problem

1999-04-28 Thread Trevor Glen
Khalid EZZARAOUI wrote: > if you have potato installed, you can't use java, you have to go to slink > (because > glibc6), or wait jdk 1.2 who is in prerelease. Oh. That would explain a few other probs. So how do I downgrade? TIA, Trev

Re: Java Problem

1999-04-28 Thread Trevor Glen
budi wibowo wrote: > have you run ldconfig before? Yep.

Re: Java Problem

1999-04-28 Thread Khalid EZZARAOUI
if you have potato installed, you can't use java, you have to go to slink (because glibc6), or wait jdk 1.2 who is in prerelease.

Re: Java problem

1999-01-25 Thread Dale E. Martin
Daniel Elenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I get this error message when I run java or javac. But everything > works. > I use slink and the slink java packages. Anyone who knows what's up? > > Warning: can't find /usr/lib/jdk1.1/bin/../bin/checkVersions, hope > that's ok There's a bug filed ab