On 7 June 2010 17:50, Camaleón wrote:
> In fact, it seems there are dedicated tools for defragging many of the
> most popular filesystems:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defrag#Approach_and_defragmenters_by_file_system_type
>
> What I have not found is something for ReiserFS volumes :-?
>
That
On Sun, 06 Jun 2010 22:06:01 +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> This seems to imply that JFS needs to be defragged:
> http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/JFS_Filesystem#Defragmenting_JFS
> "JFS, like all file systems, will degrade in performance over time due
> to file fragmentation. While there is in-pl
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 06:48:27AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04/29/08 06:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
>
> > Anyway, are you just joking or are there serious reasons against XFS? I
> > am not
>
> Yes, it's just Austin Powers and Mo
Alex Samad wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 07:17:56PM -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:16:12PM -0500, Hose wrote:
On Apr 15, 2008, at 8:49 PM, Chris Walters wrote:
I have to agree - I've been using a combo of reiser and jfs for the
past 5 years as different parts of p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/29/08 06:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote at 2008-04-29 11:34 +0200:
>> On 04/29/08 01:24, Alex Samad wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 09:52:16PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 04/28/08 19:22, Alex Samad wrote:
> some r
Ron Johnson wrote at 2008-04-29 11:34 +0200:
On 04/29/08 01:24, Alex Samad wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 09:52:16PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 04/28/08 19:22, Alex Samad wrote:
some reason that xfs is not being talked about?
We hate it because Dr. Evil uses it.
has this got something to do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/29/08 01:24, Alex Samad wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 09:52:16PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>> On 04/28/08 19:22, Alex Samad wrote:
> [snip]
>>> some reason that xfs is not being talked about?
>> We hate it because Dr. Evil uses it.
> has thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alex Samad wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 01:19:15AM -0500, Hose wrote:
>> On Apr 28, 2008, at 7:22 PM, Alex Samad wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 07:17:56PM -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:16:12PM -0500, Hose w
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 01:19:15AM -0500, Hose wrote:
>
> On Apr 28, 2008, at 7:22 PM, Alex Samad wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 07:17:56PM -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:16:12PM -0500, Hose wrote:
>>
[snip]
>>
>> some reason that xfs is not being talked about?
>
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 09:52:16PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04/28/08 19:22, Alex Samad wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > some reason that xfs is not being talked about?
>
> We hate it because Dr. Evil uses it.
has this got something to do with elde
On Apr 28, 2008, at 7:22 PM, Alex Samad wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 07:17:56PM -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:16:12PM -0500, Hose wrote:
On Apr 15, 2008, at 8:49 PM, Chris Walters wrote:
I have to agree - I've been using a combo of reiser and jfs for the
past
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/28/08 19:22, Alex Samad wrote:
[snip]
>
> some reason that xfs is not being talked about?
We hate it because Dr. Evil uses it.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
We want... a Shrubbery!!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 07:17:56PM -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:16:12PM -0500, Hose wrote:
> > On Apr 15, 2008, at 8:49 PM, Chris Walters wrote:
>
> > I have to agree - I've been using a combo of reiser and jfs for the
> > past 5 years as different parts of producti
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:16:12PM -0500, Hose wrote:
On Apr 15, 2008, at 8:49 PM, Chris Walters wrote:
I have to agree - I've been using a combo of reiser and jfs for the
past 5 years as different parts of production systems, and I find both
to be fairly re
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:16:12PM -0500, Hose wrote:
> On Apr 15, 2008, at 8:49 PM, Chris Walters wrote:
> I have to agree - I've been using a combo of reiser and jfs for the
> past 5 years as different parts of production systems, and I find both
> to be fairly reliable, and much less annoying
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/15/08 23:16, Hose wrote:
>
[snip]
> sometimes be a hassle). I have a severe dislike for ext, though I
Why?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
We want... a Shrubbery!!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hose wrote:
| On Apr 15, 2008, at 8:49 PM, Chris Walters wrote:
|> I use JFS, and have been quite satisfied with its performance, and
|> reliability.
|> ~ On the subject of dead file systems, if they're going to remove JFS
|> from the
|> kernel bec
On Apr 15, 2008, at 8:49 PM, Chris Walters wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Alex Samad wrote:
| Hi
|
| I remember reading in the list that JFS was a dying FS, because IBM
| wasn't maintaining it full time. And that it might disappear from
the
| kernel soon.
|
| Any one
On 16/04/2008, Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I usually fill up tmp with crap.
>
> but i did follwo up some more on jfs , seems like there is no full time
> maintenance on it so, and i had thought I had read that it was meant to
> be fast for lots of small files, but I must have miss r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Alex Samad wrote:
| On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 09:49:44PM -0400, Chris Walters wrote:
|> Alex Samad wrote:
|> | Hi
| [snip]
|> Anyhow, JFS hasn't given me any problems, and at one time I used it for
|> everything except for my /boot partition.
| yes i
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 09:49:44PM -0400, Chris Walters wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Alex Samad wrote:
> | Hi
[snip]
> Hi Alex,
>
> I use JFS, and have been quite satisfied with its performance, and
> reliability.
> ~ On the subject of dead file systems, if they'r
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 09:39:05PM -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 07:26:15AM +1000, Alex Samad wrote:
> > I remember reading in the list that JFS was a dying FS, because IBM
> > wasn't maintaining it full time. And that it might disappear from the
> > kernel soon.
> >
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Alex Samad wrote:
| Hi
|
| I remember reading in the list that JFS was a dying FS, because IBM
| wasn't maintaining it full time. And that it might disappear from the
| kernel soon.
|
| Any one still using it. I was actually thinking of using it fo
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 07:26:15AM +1000, Alex Samad wrote:
> I remember reading in the list that JFS was a dying FS, because IBM
> wasn't maintaining it full time. And that it might disappear from the
> kernel soon.
>
> Any one still using it. I was actually thinking of using it for my /tmp
> di
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Matej Cepl wrote:
CJ van den Berg wrote:
This bug has caused serious data loss on my systems and no end of
headaches in the last two weeks. I really hope the fix goes into a debian
kernel soon to save others the pain.
Just curious -- this is not the first report about c
I have used reiser for squid servers for over a year and they are
heavily loaded, no issues. Don't use software raid its flaky, so use
reiser on hw raid.
Regards
thing
-Original Message-
From: John Kelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 22 June 2005 11:29 a.m.
To: debian-user@
I am using XFS, which has great performance and never corrupt. It is
fast and pretty stable. I use 2.4.19 with XFS 1.1.2-pre3 downloaded from
SGI web page. and compiled with preempt patch. One thing I really like
XFS is you can upgrade to a new version without reformat the partion,
which is very co
27 matches
Mail list logo
