Re: Is Security Host up

2004-02-07 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 7 Feb 2004 14:42:54 -0800 Marc Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 03:17:11AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > as per the posting on 2nd of Feb. saying that klecker had crashed, Is > > security.debian.org back in bus

Re: Is Security Host up

2004-02-07 Thread Jeff Green
Marc Wilson wrote: On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 03:17:11AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: as per the posting on 2nd of Feb. saying that klecker had crashed, Is security.debian.org back in business... And of course it was FAR easier to jump in with another idiot-level question, rather than check th

Re: Is Security Host up

2004-02-07 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 7 Feb 2004 15:56:15 -0600 "Jacob S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 03:17:11 +0530 > Ritesh Raj Sarraf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > hi all, > > > > as per the po

Re: Is Security Host up

2004-02-07 Thread Marc Wilson
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 03:17:11AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > as per the posting on 2nd of Feb. saying that klecker had crashed, Is > security.debian.org back in business... And of course it was FAR easier to jump in with another idiot-level question, rather than check the archive, or horro

Re: Is Security Host up

2004-02-07 Thread Jacob S.
On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 03:17:11 +0530 Ritesh Raj Sarraf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > hi all, > > as per the posting on 2nd of Feb. saying that klecker had crashed, Is > security.debian.org back in business or should I still use the > substitute hos