me& wrote:
> if one would need to install a production server would he choose Potato or
> Woody? I have nothing against installing Potato but what bothers me is
> ipchains and the relative old kernel. Do I need to be worried about future
> packages, who can be interesting, who will not being able
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 11:31:24PM -0500, Ray Bowles wrote:
| Anyone know why I wouldn't be able to intall potato using a MS Natural KB
| Pro (I also have a wireless Intellimouse Pro) both are USB I disconnected
| the mouse with the same result. they work under progeny and redhat so it
| must be sp
> This could be where I've been going wrong. Whenever I rebuild the
> kernel, and at the stage where I run dpkg, I get the warning about
> there being an existing /lib/modules/2.2.19pre17 directory.
> Normally I move this out of the way before running dpkg, and it
> gets recreated by dpkg. How
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Thursday 29 November 2001 23:30, Paolo Falcone wrote:
>
> > /usr/src/modules.
>>
>> The modules are downloaded already in /lib/modules/2.2.19pre17
>> (as the installer placed them during the installation process)
>> Use modconf to install them.
>
>Yes they are, but wh
On Thursday 29 November 2001 23:30, Paolo Falcone wrote:
> /usr/src/modules.
>
> The modules are downloaded already in /lib/modules/2.2.19pre17
> (as the installer placed them during the installation process)
> Use modconf to install them.
Yes they are, but when I rebuild the kernel, I've been d
On Thursday 29 November 2001 23:48, nate wrote:
> on my ibm thinkpads(iSeries and T20) i use the standard
> debian kernel, then build my own from sources. i also
> install pcmcia from source, and alsa from source. then
> i usually install the alsa utils and pcmcia utils from
> packages and overwri
> Q) My CD set is 2.2 r3, with kernel 2.2.19pre17.
> What is the difference between kernel 2.2.19pre17 and 2.2.19?
pre17 is older then 2.2.19. it is a pre release of 2.2.19.
i would strongly reccomend, if your compiling your own
kernel to go with 2.2.19. not that theres any real problem
with the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Q) My CD set is 2.2 r3, with kernel 2.2.19pre17.
>What is the difference between kernel 2.2.19pre17 and 2.2.19?
2.2.19 is more recent than 2.2.19pre17
>Q) Which kernel is best to install on a laptop?
>Is it the -compact one that I see when I browse dselect?
No idea,
On Sun, 23 Sep 2001, Wolfgang Hlawatsch wrote:
> I want to telnet the SMALL. It does not allow access. In hosts.allow I placed
> "ALL". in hosts the IP of the BIG is also mentioned. I tried everything, but
> SMALL wants to remain as a single.
If you are using xinetd, you will have to disable th
Now, after 4 hours of work, I've finally managed to install potato using the
linux driver from Promise.
If someone is interested in the exact way I did it, I could provide a
description.
Jonas
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2001 18:55 schrieb Jonas Wolz:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to install Potato (2.2r2) on
David wrote:
>Does anyone know if the kernel on potato has been patched to support
>reiserfs? but the real question is how do I make my own bootable debian
>installs if they don't, and/or I have a new kernel driver I want to be
>able to install?
The default kernels (and also those on potato th
it's in 3c59x. I'm multitasking, forgive me.
On Saturday, 29 April 2000 at 22:45, Brendan Cully wrote:
> forget it. I didn't notice it was _compiled in_. The shame.
>
> Sorry for the wasted bandwidth (again).
>
> -Brendan
>
> On Saturday, 29 April 2000 at 22:30, Brendan Cully wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
forget it. I didn't notice it was _compiled in_. The shame.
Sorry for the wasted bandwidth (again).
-Brendan
On Saturday, 29 April 2000 at 22:30, Brendan Cully wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to install potato from boot floppies and I've run into a
> stupid problem: I've got a 3c905 on the target m
> Is there a way to install Potato via ppp when I have only a slink CD and the
> base floppies for slink? Can I download some Potato base floppy images?
>
If you have slink installed and you insists on downloading then apt is probably
the way to go.
The current set of base floppies are in
http
As always, with the unstable version (potato), you're taking a
risk installing it that on the day you decide to upgrade,
any of the packages might be very broken.
As of a few weeks ago, there was a boot-floppies for potato.
I used it to install a machine and they worked with a couple of
bugs, whi
On Tue, Dec 21, 1999 at 09:16:53AM -0800, Clyde Wilson wrote:
> I reformated my disks and loaded the base potato floppies.
> When I run apt under dselect I end up with so many missing
> programs that deselect refuses to continue...
>
> I have selected nothing during dselect, I just want to install
esl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can someone please help me. I would like to install potato. I started
> with resc1440.bin found under potato subtree.
Last I kenw, you shouldn't use those unless you want to help develop
them; they're really not ready yet. Join the debian-boot mailing list
if y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wed, 6 Oct 1999, esl wrote:
> Can someone please help me. I would like to install potato. I started
> with resc1440.bin found under potato subtree. Along the way this thing
> needs base2_1.tgz which I know is for slink. What am I missing here? I
> have every
*- On 19 Jun, Andrew White wrote about "Installing Potato"
> I just downloaded the whole of the Potato main, contrib and non-free
> dirs..and went through the install...
>
> When running dselect I get an error...
>
> ../base/libc6_2.1.1-12.deb containing libc6:
> libc conflicts with apt <<0.3.0
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
